STORY: "Senators urge action on FBI's use of faulty forensic evidence," by reporter Matthew Fleming, published by rollcall.com on April 28, 2015;
GIST: "A group of Democratic senators on Tuesday urged action from the
Justice Department and the FBI in response to a recent FBI study
showing erroneous and invalid testimony in 96 percent of cases analyzed
involving microscopic hair analysis. The study also revealed 32 defendants of the 257 cases found to be
prosecuted on faulty forensic evidence had been sentenced to death. “We are deeply disturbed to learn that hundreds of potentially
innocent defendants were imprisoned or even executed based at least in
part on flawed evidence,” the senators wrote. “We commend the Department
of Justice (“the Department”) and the FBI for voluntarily undertaking
this review. We now request that you take steps to correct the
incredible injustices the review has revealed and to strengthen the
science and standards underpinning forensic science.” The letter calls for a three-pronged response to the study: that the
Justice Department review the use of microscopic hair analysis in
prosecutions by the FBI; that the Justice Department give those who have
been convicted using erroneous microscopic hair analysis evidence a
“full and fair opportunity to challenge their convictions” instead of
simply just being informed of the error; and that the Justice Department
and FBI work with the National Academy of Sciences and the National
Institute of Standards and Technology to review the processes and
standards of other disciplines of forensic science to identify
opportunities for “stronger standards, better training, and further
scientific research.”
The entire story can be found at:
http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/senators-urge-action-on-fbis-use-of-faulty-forensic-evidence/?d
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
I
have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses
several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of
the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this
powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and
myself get more out of the site.
The
Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible
years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr.
Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of
Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"
section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It
can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com.
Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;