STORY: "Rodney Reed Hearing Set for October," by reporter Chase Hoffberger, published by The Austin Chronicle on July 9, 2017.
SUB-HEADING: "Exculpatory evidence at issue in four-day hearing."
GIST: "Rodney Reed, the Bastrop man living for nearly two decades on death row for the murder of Stacey Stites,
will get another chance to prove he’s not a murderer beginning Oct. 10.
Bastrop County’s online court database notes that a three-day hearing
is set for Oct. 10-13 in Judge Carson Campbell’s 21st District court in Bastrop. In May, the state’s Court of Criminal Appeals remanded
the case to the trial court and ordered a hearing on the grounds that
Reed and his attorneys say they have evidence that points to Jimmy Fennell Jr.,
Stites’ fiancé at the time, being her killer. Reed's attorneys had
filed a motion last June that argues their client deserves a rehearing
on the grounds that information obtained by CNN during interviews for an
episode of the network’s show Death Row Stories points to a conflicting detail in the timeline Fennell provided to investigators after Stites’ murder. The former Giddings police officer, who’s now serving a 10-year
prison sentence for raping a woman he held in custody, had said in his
official statement two days after Stites’ body was found (and later in
court during Reed’s capital murder trial) that he spent the entire
evening with her on April 22, 1996, and slept through her departure for
an early-morning shift at a Bastrop H-E-B. But what CNN had learned and
passed on to Reed's legal team via a dictation of a portion of an interview transcript with former Bastrop County sheriff’s deputy and Fennell’s old best friend Curtis L. Davis,
was that Fennell had told Davis that he actually spent the night of
April 22 drinking beer with fellow police officers by his truck after a
Little League baseball practice. Davis allegedly revealed to CNN that
Fennell told him the next morning that he didn’t return home to Stites
until 10 or 11 o’clock that night. That’s not the first time that such a discrepancy has come up. The
former cop has long provided conflicting chronologies of his actions
around the time of the murder (Bryce Benjet, Reed's lead attorney, lists
six different instances in a February 2015 motion for a rehearing),
and previously untested evidence is mounting that indicates Fennell was
present at many points during the full timetable relevant to Stites’
murder – though the state has, to date, stonewalled Reed’s team from getting that evidence analyzed."
The entire story can be found at
The entire story can be found at
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/c