PHOTO CAPTION: "Jeffrey Havard, now on Mississippi’s death row, insists he accidentally dropped the baby, Chloe Madison Britt, and that she hit her head on a toilet. A hearing in court on Aug. 14 will determine if Havard will receive a new trial in the 2002 crime."
PHOTO CAPTION: "Jeffrey Havard, now on Mississippi’s death row, insists he accidentally dropped the baby, Chloe Madison Britt, and that she hit her head on a toilet. A hearing in court on Aug. 14 will determine if Havard will receive a new trial in the 2002 crime."
GIST: "Fifteen years ago, Dr. Steven Hayne told jurors Jeffrey Havard had
shaken a 6-month-old baby to death, comparing the injuries to those seen
in falls from significant heights. On
Monday, he backed off that conclusion, testifying that “tremendous G
forces can be generated in a short fall. If it’s straight to the head,
then it could cause serious injury.” The
38-year-old Havard, now on Mississippi’s death row, insists he
accidentally dropped the baby, Chloe Madison Britt, and that she hit her
head on a toilet. Since 2000, at least 11
Mississippians have been convicted in cases involving the shaken baby
syndrome, with two of them sitting on death row. Havard is one of them. The
state Supreme Court has ordered the hearing for Havard to decide if he
deserves a new trial because of shifting scientific beliefs on the
syndrome. In Havard’s 2002 trial, all the doctors
concluded that Chloe died of the syndrome, and so did Hayne, who
performed the autopsy. He said the death would be “consistent with a
person … violently shaking a child back and forth to produce the
injuries … The type of injuries that you can see that parallel these are
in motor vehicle crashes, falls from significant heights and the like.” In court Monday, Hayne testified that a short fall can cause serious injury. He
said that the term he would use now would be “abusive head trauma” to
describe the injuries to Chloe, which he said included bruises on the
forehead, scalp, back of head and mouth as well as bleeding between the
skull and brain. He said he still believed her death was a homicide. For
decades, physicians believed that a triad of symptoms provided ironclad
proof that someone had shaken a child to death, known as shaken baby
syndrome. But
new studies have raised questions about the syndrome. In 2009, the
American Academy of Pediatrics recommended the diagnosis of the syndrome
be discarded and replaced with "abusive head trauma.” Renowned
pathologist Dr. Michael Baden of New York testified Monday that the
problem with the “abusive head trauma” conclusion is that it’s
impossible to tell whether a person accidentally fell down the stairs or
someone pushed that person. He said he absolutely
disagreed with a prosecution expert who testified at the 2002 trial,
claiming that Chloe's retinal hemorrhages proved that this baby had been
shaken. “It’s my opinion that shaking had nothing
to do with the death,” he said. “It’s my opinion that all of the
injuries are consistent with blunt force impact.” The
baby’s injuries are consistent with the fall that Havard described,
Baden said. “With short falls, you can have fatal injuries.” When doctors overstate the case, such as with the shaken baby syndrome, “innocent people can get convicted,” he said. Under
cross-examination, he said he was charging $21,000 for his fees and
travel. He said he had not been paid for any of his work on the case
over the past five years. In 2002, the Adams County
jury convicted Havard, concluding that he was guilty of killing and
sexually abusing Chloe, and sentenced him to death. The
hearing is expected to continue this week, and Circuit Judge Forrest
Johnson said he won’t rule until after he receives legal briefs from
attorneys. He barred testimony on possible sexual
assault, saying the state Supreme Court decision centered strictly on
the shaken baby syndrome. “I have no jurisdiction to go there,” he said. In
2014, Hayne told The Clarion-Ledger, “I didn't think there was a sexual
assault. I didn't see any evidence of sexual assault.” During
Havard's capital murder trial, doctors, nurses, the sheriff and others
told jurors about tears, rips, lacerations and bleeding they saw in the
child's anal area. "Maybe they were looking at
folds and thought they were tears," Hayne told the newspaper. "We were
very careful, and we also took sections." A rape kit found no semen or foreign DNA, and he examined those sections under a microscope. His
conclusion? They were no tears, rips or similar injuries to the child's
rectum, he told the newspaper. "I would think that would be a
definitive evaluation."
The entire story can be found at:
See Natchez-Democrat story (Carl Madden) at the link below (for a more detailed analysis of the on-going hearing. HL);
http://www.natchezdemocrat.com/2017/08/15/how-did-baby-britt-die-shaken-baby-syndrome-at-center-of-hearing-in-2002-death-penalty-case/
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/c