Friday, December 29, 2017

Derrie Nelson: D.C. Flawed FBI hair matching analysis by former FBI Agent Michael Malone (said by judge to have "rested on a foundation of lies") led Nelson to be wrongfully locked up for 33 years. Nelson is the sixth man in the last eight years to have his conviction overturned on false hair analysis, FOX5 reports. (Reporter Paul Wagner)..."Since 2009, government prosecutors have admitted false hair analysis was used to convict Kevin Martin, Kirk Odom, Cleveland Wright, Santae Tribble and Donald Gates. All of the men won certificates of actual innocence and large monetary settlements."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Jurors love Law and Order, they love these documentary shows, they love these shows where there is all this science involved,” said Grimm. “So when they get in the jury room and they deliberate, they will throw out eyewitness testimony, which can be unreliable for some reasons … Twelve people can agree even if we throw all that out, we still have this hair that came from this defendant's head and was found at the victim’s apartment, place or on her body or on his body, and that alone you can get an unanimous verdict. Out of that alone by itself, just the hair.”

Bernie Grimm: Represented Kevin Martin, one of the five other men whose conviction was overturned.

----------------------------------

SECOND QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "The last thing I said when I left the courtroom in 1985 was I suggest you find the person who did this."

Derrie Nelson to FOX News.

----------------------------------

THIRD QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Malone presented his conclusions as definitive science when they simply were not...the statistical conclusions were at best a guess and at worst yet another fabrication.”

Judge Todd Edelman;

----------------------------------

STORY: "DC judge overturns 1985 murder case conviction," by reporter Paul Wagner, published by FOX5 on December 28, 2017."

GIST: A D.C. Superior Court judge has thrown out a conviction in a 1985 murder case saying the testimony of an FBI agent "rested on a foundation of lies. Derrie Nelson has been locked up for 33 years and learned last week that his conviction has been overturned. He is the sixth man in the last eight years to have his conviction overturned on false hair analysis. The details in this case are extensive, but suffice it to say at trial, prosecutors claimed Nelson entered the house to retrieve some of his belongings, and after ransacking the place, he shot and killed Nichols. During the trial, FBI agent Michael Malone claimed hairs found on the body of Nichols were a match to Nelson. Despite maintaining his innocence, Nelson was convicted. "The last thing I said when I left the courtroom in 1985 was I suggest you find the person who did this,” Nelson told FOX 5 by phone from a federal prison in Butner, North Carolina. "I do not understand the delay in this especially when the Department of Justice has already admitted that they know agent Michael P. Malone's was fraudulent, his techniques were malfeasance,” said Nelson. “It was wrong and they didn't approve of it, and so it seems to me they should have moved swiftly to handle my case and get it out of the way.”  In his 40-page opinion, Judge Todd Edelman wrote, “Malone presented his conclusions as definitive science when they simply were not" and "the statistical conclusions were at best a guess and at worst yet another fabrication.” Bernie Grimm represented Kevin Martin, one of the five other men whose conviction was overturned. "Jurors love Law and Order, they love these documentary shows, they love these shows where there is all this science involved,” said Grimm. “So when they get in the jury room and they deliberate, they will throw out eyewitness testimony, which can be unreliable for some reasons … Twelve people can agree even if we throw all that out, we still have this hair that came from this defendant's head and was found at the victim’s apartment, place or on her body or on his body, and that alone you can get an unanimous verdict. Out of that alone by itself, just the hair.” Following the judge's ruling, the U.S. Attorney’s Office immediately filed a motion for a status hearing now scheduled for February. The U.S. Attorney’s Office said they are now reviewing the judge's ruling and have no further comment."




http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/dc-judge-overturns-1985-murder-case-conviction

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog."