STORY: "Judge to rule on request for new trial in case of father convicted in infant's death," by reporter Trace Christenson, published by The Battlecreek Inquirer on January 11, 2018.
GIST: "A
Calhoun County judge will decide in a couple of months if a Battle
Creek man convicted in connection with his son's death will receive a
new trial. Shawn Brown, 33, is
serving a sentence of eight to 30 years in prison after he was convicted
of manslaughter and child abuse in the death Jan. 24, 2010 of his
five-month old son, Shawn Brown Jr. Prosecutors alleged the child was shaken by his father two days before he died. But
attorneys and student attorneys from the Michigan Innocence Clinic at
the University of Michigan have argued Brown did not receive a fair
trial because his defense attorney did not present a medical expert to
refute prosecution testimony. The case is similar
to the Calhoun County case of Leo Ackley who was convicted in 2011 in
the death of his girlfriend's three-year old daughter. He was convicted
of murder but the Michigan Supreme Court overturned that conviction
because the defense did not present its own expert. Ackley was tried and
convicted a second time in 2016 and is serving a life sentence. But judges across the state have concluded from several appellate decisions that defense attorneys should present experts. At
a hearing Thursday lawyers for Brown presented a medical expert and
Brown's trial attorney to convince Calhoun County Circuit Judge Sarah
Lincoln that Brown should have a new trial. Attorney
James Goulooze of Hastings told the judge he was hired by friends of
Brown, who is indigent, and had no other money to hire an expert. The
presiding judge at the trial in 2011 declined to provide county funds
for a doctor to consult with Goulooze and testify for Brown. "I
knew we needed an expert," Goulooze told Imran Syed, an attorney from
the Innocence Clinic. "I knew there was controversy brewing in the
medical community about Shaken Baby Syndrome. I knew I needed someone." Goulooze
said he talked with a long-time friend who was a physician but not an
expert in head trauma and did some of his own research. "I
felt we could present a decent case," he said. "I would have preferred
an expert. I was baffled by some of the medical testimony." He told Syed it was not a trial strategy to go without an expert. "There were no finances available." Dr.
Joseph Scheller, a Baltimore doctor of pediatrics and neurology,
testified there were more explanations for the baby's death than that he
was shaken or struck in the head. He called shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma "an idea that is still in flux." Scheller
told student attorney Lauren Flamang that if called to testify at trial
he could say the child suffered some trauma but that it might have been
two weeks or two months before his death. The
doctor, who studied the medical records, said he would have expected to
find signs of external injury to the child's neck or skull or perhaps
other broken bones. Instead the bleeding in the brain can be explained
in other ways. "It could have been complications from a prior condition," the doctor said. He
did acknowledge when questioned by Assistant Prosecutor Karen Palowski
that the child could have been injured without outward signs of
trauma if thrown against something soft or while wearing heavy clothes. Goulooze
also testified he attempted to introduce an audio tape of an interview
of Brown by police after he was told his son was dead and that he was
being charged with murder. In the the recording, Brown is heard crying and telling the officer, "I didn't do anything. All I tried to do was save my son." Goulooze
said the recording shows Brown was not indifferent to his son's death,
as some prosecution witnesses had testified. Goulooze said the recording
had been admitted but was then was stricken after a motion by
prosecutors. "I felt the tape should have come in
after the prosecutor showed apathy and lack of compassion. The tape
would have made a difference," he said. "I think the jury would have
come back with a not guilty." Lincoln said both
sides can submit briefs and rebuttals in the next six weeks and she will
then issue a written opinion on the motion for a new trial."
The entire story can be read at: