PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The videotape of the
interview showed one of the detectives telling Griffin he could “fry” or
get “the chair” and so had better cooperate."
STORY: "New Haven man convicted of 2013 killing with assault rifle," by reporter Randall Beach, published by The New Haven Register on February 20 2018.
GIST: "Twelve jurors Tuesday found Bobby Griffin Jr.
guilty of murder and three other counts in the shooting death of
Nathaniel Bradley five years ago in New Haven. In addition, Superior Court Judge Elpedio N. Vitale found
Griffin guilty of criminal possession of a firearm. As a previously
convicted felon, Griffin was not allowed to have a weapon. During their closing arguments last Friday, the two
prosecutors displayed the assault rifle that was used to shoot Bradley
twice in the back during an attempted robbery at the corner of Ella T.
Grasso Boulevard and Goffe Terrace the night of Oct. 14, 2013. The rifle was found in Griffin’s attic when police executed a search and seizure warrant. Griffin, 25, of Peck Street, was convicted by the jury of
felony murder (causing a death in the course of another crime, such as
robbery), murder, attempted first-degree robbery and conspiracy to
commit first-degree robbery. Vitale set a tentative sentencing date of May 8 and
raised Griffin’s bond from $1 million to $2.5 million. Griffin faces a
potential sentence of more than 100 years. During his summation of the prosecution’s case last
Friday morning, Assistant State’s Attorney Sean McGuinness cited Nathan
L. Johnson’s testimony that Griffin wanted to rob somebody. And so he
arranged to have Bradley, 36, of Hamden, come to that Boulevard corner
to sell some marijuana. But Johnson said Griffin came out of a nearby alley
brandishing the assault rifle, pointed it at Bradley and told him: “Run
everything.” This is street talk for “give me everything you’ve got.” Johnson quoted Bradley replying, “You can have
everything” and turning to get back into his car. At that point, Griffin
shot him twice. Johnson testified he didn’t understand why Griffin had
shot Bradley. But McGuinness said in his closing argument that Griffin
“had been disrespected” and was so angry he fired at Bradley with the
intent of killing him. Defense attorney Wade Luckett had argued the state lacked
forensic evidence and had relied on Johnson’s account as well as
Griffin’s police statement. Luckett said Johnson was not credible
because he had entered into a cooperation agreement with the state.
Prosecutors dropped a felony murder charge and Johnson pleaded guilty to
attempted first-degree robbery and conspiracy to commit first-degree
robbery. He faces a prison sentence of up to 30 years. Griffin testified in his own defense last Thursday,
saying Johnson had shot Bradley. Griffin said he ran from the scene and
later accepted the rifle from Johnson. As for Griffin’s confession to two police detectives
under about 3 1/2 hours of questioning, Griffin said the detectives kept
pressuring him until “I thought I had no choice.” The videotape of the
interview showed one of the detectives telling Griffin he could “fry” or
get “the chair” and so had better cooperate. However, Senior Assistant State’s Attorney John P. Doyle
Jr. reminded jurors in his closing argument that detectives had read
Griffin his Miranda rights to remain silent and ask for an attorney; he
signed the form and agreed to begin answering questions. They had also
told him he could stop the questioning at any time."
The entire story can be read at:
https://www.nhregister.com/news/article/New-Haven-man-convicted-of-2013-killing-with-12627439.php
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the
Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my
previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put
considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith
and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic
pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses
on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please
send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest
to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy;
Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog."