PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I have run far too many posts detailing cases in which the Reid Technique has been accused of leading to miscarriages of justice over the decades. They showed how there were extremely serious risks entailed in using the method on juveniles. They showed how the company was even trying to teach its method inside high schools. More recently, Wicklander-Zulawski, the company which had partnered with Reid - severed its connections, CEO Shane Sturman saying in a public statement that, "In future classes, WZ will only discuss
the Reid Method in effort to highlight potential risks posed in
obtaining a false confession, or to illustrate the major advantages of
using the WZ Non-Confrontational Method.”..."..."With the availability of DNA evidence, and
with efforts from organizations such as The Innocence Project, there has
been a heightened awareness of the danger of improper use of
interrogation tactics. Wrongful convictions, exonerations and false
confessions have become a more global point of discussion, and
justifiably so. Although the Reid Method can be a useful tool in
obtaining a confession, cases have shown that the improper use of the
method, combined with the intense emotional pressure put on the suspect,
can lead to catastrophic results. The Reid Method has remained
relatively unchanged since the 1970s, and it conflicts with the
progressive nature of how people communicate today. The Reid Method does
not reflect updates in our legal system and does not acknowledge the
availability of scholarly work on the subject. “Because of the possible abuses inherent in
the confrontational Reid style, we believe it is time to move away from
the practices of the 1970s when it was developed,” Sturman concluded.
“While the Reid Method has been successful in solving crimes over the
years, there are serious pitfalls and significant risks associated with
the incorrect application of the technique." Why would training in
Reid's often heavy handed techniques be sought out by police forces
seeking instruction on child abuse investigations? The answer may well
lie in the current criticism of police for failure pursue sexual abuse
allegations - even in cases where there is little more than 'he says -
she says,' - a test far below the 'reasonable prospect of conviction' test, which is used by most jurisdictions for non-sex related offences. An officer is quoted in the
story below as saying "This is for the children." Yes, indeed it is.
But it is still a criminal investigation, with obligations to the
suspect to provide a fair, unbiased investigation, free of heavy-handed,
dangerous investigative techniques and respectful of the presumption of innocence.
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.-----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.enidnews.com/oklahoma/news/local-area-law-enforcement-officers-receive-specialized-training/article_83f6bd62-345e-5551-8ccc-001a4c0417a7.html
Read the Wicklander release at the link below: "Wicklander-Zulawski & Associates, Inc. (WZ),
a world leader in interview and interrogation training services for
federal government agencies, law enforcement organizations and
corporations, announced today the company will no longer offer training
in the controversial Reid Method. WZ has been licensed by John E. Reid and
Associates, Inc., originator and developer of the Reid Method, and had
included this direct, positive interrogation method in their standard
public sector curriculum with WZ’s non-confrontational techniques for
the last 33 years. WZ Certified Forensic Interviewer (CFI©)
instructors have conducted training for more than 200,000 law
enforcement officers worldwide since the founding of the firm in 1982. Going forward, WZ
will standardize their core instruction on multiple techniques
including the Participatory Method, Cognitive Interviewing, Fact-Finding
and Selective Interviewing, as well as the popular WZ
Non-Confrontational Method. A major city police department recently
contracted with WZ to teach this exact combination of industry best
practices in seminars for their new detectives. This customized course
was designed to provide progressive, comprehensive training in multiple
non-confrontational interviewing techniques with a focus on obtaining
truthful information and admissions. It will now become WZ’s flagship seminar for law enforcement. “It’s human nature to deny and defend oneself.
Confrontation is not an effective way of getting truthful information,”
said WZ President and CEO Shane Sturman, CFI. “Rather than primarily
seeking a confession, it’s an important goal for investigators to find
the truth ethically through a respectful, non-confrontational approach.”
Sturman added, “WZ has dedicated instructional blocks to educate
detectives on the causes of false confessions and the risks of utilizing
improper interrogation methods. In future classes, WZ will only discuss
the Reid Method in effort to highlight potential risks posed in
obtaining a false confession, or to illustrate the major advantages of
using the WZ Non-Confrontational Method.” Approximately 29% of DNA exonerations in the
US since 1989 have involved false confessions to the crime. A
combination of factors could cause innocent persons to confess to a
crime they did not commit. Academics have chronicled the commonalities
among these cases and found the suspect is often mentally or
intellectually challenged, interviewed without an attorney or parent,
interrogated for over three hours, or told information about the crime
by the investigators. In addition, the officers in these cases were
often trained in the Reid Technique of Interview and Interrogation.
Although one might argue that the officers misused their training in the
Technique, many courts and law enforcement agencies are moving away
from this confrontational approach to non-confrontational styles. With the availability of DNA evidence, and
with efforts from organizations such as The Innocence Project, there has
been a heightened awareness of the danger of improper use of
interrogation tactics. Wrongful convictions, exonerations and false
confessions have become a more global point of discussion, and
justifiably so. Although the Reid Method can be a useful tool in
obtaining a confession, cases have shown that the improper use of the
method, combined with the intense emotional pressure put on the suspect,
can lead to catastrophic results. The Reid Method has remained
relatively unchanged since the 1970s, and it conflicts with the
progressive nature of how people communicate today. The Reid Method does
not reflect updates in our legal system and does not acknowledge the
availability of scholarly work on the subject. “Because of the possible abuses inherent in
the confrontational Reid style, we believe it is time to move away from
the practices of the 1970s when it was developed,” Sturman concluded.
“While the Reid Method has been successful in solving crimes over the
years, there are serious pitfalls and significant risks associated with
the incorrect application of the technique. WZ will remain a
progressive, evolving organization dedicated to partnering with
academics, attorneys, researchers, corporations, and law enforcement
agencies around the world to ensure the tools we are teaching are
ethical, moral and legally acceptable.""
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/