PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "The technique, developed in the 1960s, is called the 
John Reid technique and “has gone on to influence most of the 
interrogation techniques taught in American police academies”. It 
involves nine different stages, nine different stages, leading from 
confrontation, to spoken confession, to a final written confession. The
 technique includes “At the beginning of the interrogation, the 
investigator enters the room, stands about three or four feet away from 
the suspect, and in a very direct and unequivocal way, accuses him or 
her of committing the crime. This technique has allegedly 
compelled thousands of innocent people to confess to crimes that they 
did not commit. Lamarr Monson underwent 10 hours of interrogation. He
 says he was told by the detective, “She sold drugs for you … you killed
 her. (It was) just creating a scenario that they wanted “I would go 
back and forth, and back and forth, I’m tired. I’m worn. I’m, uh, 
confused. “And, um, that’s finally over with. “I’m taken to the 9th 
floor lockup at the time. I’m up there, just woke, can’t sleep, can’t 
rest, uh, can’t believe what’s going on. “And, um, you just can imagine,
 I’m just … my mind is just scrambled.”  Two
 decades later, a Detroit journalist Bill Proctor received a phone call 
from a woman saying she was with the real murderer of Christina Brown 
after the murder."
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "According to justice experts, the John Reid technique involves the 
interviewer using the following tactics: “I
 leave the room, and let you sit there for several minutes because I 
want you to get anxious. “And then I walk back in, and when I walk back 
in, I’m going to have a big, thick file with me …. with all kinds of 
papers in it. “I may have some CD disc, like, marked surveillance 
video … but it’s to show you that I have a strong investigation and I 
have all this evidence. “So, the first thing I tell you is, ‘Our 
investigation has proven “that you’re the one who committed this crime. 
There is no doubt about it whatsoever’. “There is nothing that you can 
say that will convince me otherwise. All I want to know is, why?’” And
 the Reid trained interrogator had a whole list of body language 
behaviours and verbal behaviours. If a suspect says, “I don’t know,” 
that’s considered deceptive. If a suspect says, um, “I swear to God I 
had nothing to do with this,” it is also considered deceptive behaviour.
 After ten hours of interrogation, Lamarr Monson signed a confession 
saying he involuntarily stabbed Christina Brown. The female cop who 
obtained Lamarr’s confession has since been sacked from the Detroit 
Police."
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
STORY: "False confessions: Would you confess to a crime you didn’t commit?" by reporter Candace Sutton, published by  news.com au on April 29, 2019.
 
    
    
        
    
    
        
    
    
        
     
SUB-HEADING: "Would
 you confess to a crime you didn’t commit? These are young innocent 
black Americans locked up after being coerced into saying they were 
guilty."
GIST: "In 1996, 23-year-old Lamarr Monson was making a living by selling drugs in an apartment building in Detroit. On the night of January 19 that year he spent the night at home with his six-year-old daughter. The next day, a Saturday, he went to do an afternoon shift at the apartment of a woman he knew as Cristal, Christina Brown. He finds the apartment in a state of chaos, with Christina Brown lying motionless on the floor. He believed Cristal was 17 years old. In fact she was just twelve, even though she was one of the other dealers at the apartment. Although she had been beaten, Cristal was still alive and Monson told her, “Just hold on. I’m going to get you help. “It ain’t going to be long.” He banged on apartment doors begging people to call the police, who turned up and immediately decided Monson was their suspect. Lamarr
 Monson was taken into custody and interviewed relentlessly and at 
length before confessing to and being convicted of murder and sentenced 
to 5 years in prison. Now aged 43, he is free, but only after serving 21 years in prison. Would you confess to a crime you didn’t commit? According to 
ABC TV’s Four Corners program 
False Confessions, in the US, more than a third of overturned wrongful convictions involve a false confession. The
 idea that anyone would willingly confess to a crime they didn’t commit 
sounds unbelievable, particularly when the punishment may be life in 
prison or even the death penalty. But
 a series of high-profile cases across America has revealed a slew of 
wrongful convictions based on false confessions and placed the spotlight
 on a widely used police interrogation technique designed to make people
 confess. The technique, developed in the 1960s, is called the 
John Reid technique and “has gone on to influence most of the 
interrogation techniques taught in American police academies”. It 
involves nine different stages, nine different stages, leading from 
confrontation, to spoken confession, to a final written confession. The
 technique includes “At the beginning of the interrogation, the 
investigator enters the room, stands about three or four feet away from 
the suspect, and in a very direct and unequivocal way, accuses him or 
her of committing the crime. This technique has allegedly compelled thousands of innocent people to confess to crimes that they did not commit. Lamarr Monson underwent 10 hours of interrogation. He
 says he was told by the detective, “She sold drugs for you … you killed
 her. (It was) just creating a scenario that they wanted “I would go back and forth, and back and forth, I’m tired. I’m worn. I’m, uh, confused. “And, um, that’s finally over with. “I’m taken to the 9th floor lockup at the time. I’m up there, just woke, can’t sleep, can’t rest, uh, can’t believe what’s going on. “And, um, you just can imagine, I’m just … my mind is just scrambled.”  Two
 decades later, a Detroit journalist Bill Proctor received a phone call 
from a woman saying she was with the real murderer of Christina Brown 
after the murder. Blood dripping from him, he confessed to Ishelleena Bentley he had “killed the bitch”. A crack addict at the time, Ms Bentley knew Christina had not been stabbed, rather beaten to death. After
 coming forward, Ms Bentley’s evidence resulted in a reinvestigation and
 it is found that Lamarr’s confession was based on an unsafe confession. The 12-year-old victim had been bludgeoned to death by a heavy ceramic toilet tank. The item was still in police evidence and was covered with bloody fingerprints. They did not match Lamarr Monsons, but those of Robert Lewis, who was Ishelleena Bentley’s boyfriend at the time. Granted a new trial in 2017, Lamarr Monson was exonerated and released from jail."
The entire story can be read at:
 https://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/false-confessions-would-you-confess-to-a-crime-you-didnt-commit/news-story/bfb4d6f3a5270c6db84d805379003c4e
PUBLISHER'S
  NOTE: I am monitoring this   case/issue. Keep your eye on the   
Charles  Smith Blog for reports on   developments. The Toronto Star, my 
   previous employer for more than   twenty incredible years, has put   
 considerable effort into exposing the   harm caused by Dr. Charles 
Smith    and his protectors - and into   pushing for reform of Ontario's
  forensic   pediatric pathology system.   The Star has a "topic" 
section  which focuses   on recent stories related   to Dr. Charles 
Smith. It can  be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith.   Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination   process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html   Please   send any comments or information on other cases and issues of   interest   to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.     Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.