PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "I have taken on the them of criminalizing reproduction - a natural theme for a Blog concerned with flawed science in its myriad forms and its flawed devotees (like Charles Smith), as I am utterly opposed to the current movement in the United States and some other countries - thankfully not Canada any more - towards imprisoning women and their physicians on the basis of sham science (or any other basis). Control over their reproductive lives is far too important to women in America or anywhere else so they can participate equally in the economic and social life of their nations without fear for loss their freedom at the hands of political opportunists and fanatics. I will continue to follow relevant cases such as Purvi Patel and Bei Bei Shuai - and the mounting wave of legislative attacks aimed at chipping away at Roe V. Wade and ultimately dismantling it.
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
---------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Jones was charged with manslaughter under the state’s fetal homicide laws, which defines a “person” as “a human being, including an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability.” At least 38 states have fetal homicide laws on the books. Such laws have been roundly criticized by reproductive rights advocates, who argue that they allow for the state to criminalize pregnant women and open the door to afford fetuses mote rights than pregnant women. “It’s never been about saving pregnant women or saving pregnant people or the dignity of pregnancy or any of this other nonsense they say, or justice for murdered pregnant women,” Laurie Bertram Roberts, executive director of the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, told Rolling Stone last week, in reference to the Jones case and fetal homicide laws in general. “This is just a backdoor run at Roe.”
----------------------------------------------------------
SECOND QUOTE OF THE DAY: "In response to the national outcry surrounding the case, Lynniece Washington, the district attorney for Jefferson County, Alabama, said that while her office intended to respect the decision of the grand jury to indict Jones, she had not yet officially decided whether to proceed with the manslaughter charges against her. “Let me tell each and every one of you, this has been a tragedy. A child… a child, a helpless child is now dead. Was it avoidable? Absolutely. One hundred percent. However, that young lady has to live for the rest of her life thinking about her choices and decisions,” she told an audience during a talkback session following a performance of a play in Birmingham."
------------------------------------------------------------
PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "While everyday Ms. Jones relives the most tragic event in her life, the loss of her baby, Marlaysia Jones, she is now being forced by the State to fight an unprecedented attack that threatens to leave her six-year-old daughter without her mother,” the motion says. “The prosecution of Ms. Jones is unjust and the Indictment is due to be dismissed. Although the shooting sent Jones to the hospital, authorities alleged that she was the aggressor in the fight, which led to a grand jury indicting her on one count of manslaughter. Jamison was initially charged with manslaughter, but the same grand jury declined to indict her on the grounds that she shot Jones in self-defense. Jones was charged with manslaughter under the state’s fetal homicide laws, which defines a “person” as “a human being, including an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability.”
---------------------------------------------------------------
STORY: "Lawyers File Motion to Have Marshae Jones Charges Dismissed," published by Rolling Stone on July 2, 2019.
SUB-HEADING: "The case of Marshae Jones, the pregnant woman charged with manslaughter for the shooting death of her own fetus, has sparked national outcry."
GIST: "Lawyers for Marshae Jones, the 27-year-old Alabama woman charged with manslaughter for the shooting death of her own fetus, have filed a motion in Alabama’s Jefferson County Circuit Court to have all charges against Jones dismissed. “Using a flawed and twisted rationale, the State of Alabama has charged a new theory of criminal liability that does not lawfully exist,” Jones’ counsel wrote in the motion. Jones, 27, was five months pregnant when she got in a fight with a woman named Ebony Jamison, 23, outside of a Dollar General store in Pleasant Grove, a suburb of Birmingham, Alabama. Jamison shot Jones in the stomach, killing her fetus. “While everyday Ms. Jones relives the most tragic event in her life, the loss of her baby, Marlaysia Jones, she is now being forced by the State to fight an unprecedented attack that threatens to leave her six-year-old daughter without her mother,” the motion says. “The prosecution of Ms. Jones is unjust and the Indictment is due to be dismissed. Although the shooting sent Jones to the hospital, authorities alleged that she was the aggressor in the fight, which led to a grand jury indicting her on one count of manslaughter. Jamison was initially charged with manslaughter, but the same grand jury declined to indict her on the grounds that she shot Jones in self-defense. Jones was charged with manslaughter under the state’s fetal homicide laws, which defines a “person” as “a human being, including an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability.” At least 38 states have fetal homicide laws on the books. Such laws have been roundly criticized by reproductive rights advocates, who argue that they allow for the state to criminalize pregnant women and open the door to afford fetuses mote rights than pregnant women. “It’s never been about saving pregnant women or saving pregnant people or the dignity of pregnancy or any of this other nonsense they say, or justice for murdered pregnant women,” Laurie Bertram Roberts, executive director of the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, told Rolling Stone last week, in reference to the Jones case and fetal homicide laws in general. “This is just a backdoor run at Roe.” Jones’ case has sparked national outcry, with advocates for reproductive rights criticizing state officials for holding Jones accountable for the death of her own fetus. In response to the national outcry surrounding the case, Lynniece Washington, the district attorney for Jefferson County, Alabama, said that while her office intended to respect the decision of the grand jury to indict Jones, she had not yet officially decided whether to proceed with the manslaughter charges against her. “Let me tell each and every one of you, this has been a tragedy. A child… a child, a helpless child is now dead. Was it avoidable? Absolutely. One hundred percent. However, that young lady has to live for the rest of her life thinking about her choices and decisions,” she told an audience during a talkback session following a performance of a play in Birmingham. Jones was released on $50,000 bond on Thursday. She is expected to appear in court for arraignment July 9th, at which point the judge will decide whether to grant her attorneys’ motion to have the charges dismissed."
The entire story can be read at:
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/marshae-jones-lawyers-file-motion-dismiss-manslaughter-charges-854122/
Read also Guardian Columnist Zoe William's powerful column at the link below: "Feminists have spent a long time discussing this new construction of maternal responsibility in its wider social context: why were pregnant women becoming more rigidly policed, and the advice to them more restrictive? Was this just another late-capitalist manoeuvre, to recast every misfortune as an individual failing? While this may be the case, it misses the glaringly obvious misogyny. When a mother is recast as a potential threat to her baby, her body – as the only environment in which that foetus can survive – becomes the property of whoever styles themselves as the foetus’s protector. Nothing that happens to her – from a miscarriage to being shot in the stomach – is her event, but rather can be viewed as her failure to steward and protect a body that is no longer her own. As an instrument of subjugation, this is as profound as any trope of female disempowerment in dystopian literature. The Handmaid’s Tale has already arrived, in Alabama. And feminists everywhere need to see Marshae Jones’s battle as their own."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/02/handmaids-tale-alabama-women-marshae-jones-manslaughter-unborn-child
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
