Thursday, December 26, 2019

Lamar Johnson: Missouri: Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Rich Finneran explains why Lamar Johnson deserves his day in court..."As a federal prosecutor, I was always taught that my job was not merely to obtain convictions, but to seek justice. It was just as much my duty to ensure that the innocent go free as that the guilty were brought to justice. That is why it is so troubling that Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt is fighting St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner’s efforts to obtain a new trial for Lamar Johnson. Johnson was convicted of murder in 1995. Since that conviction, two other men have confessed to the crime and denied Johnson’s involvement, and the Circuit Attorney Office’s Conviction Integrity Unit has uncovered additional information that was not known at the time of trial — including direct payments made to an eyewitness and the relevant criminal history of a jailhouse informant. That is the sort of evidence that prosecutors are constitutionally and ethically required to reveal before taking a defendant to trial. In light of this new evidence, the circuit attorney moved for a new trial for Johnson. That is what any ethical prosecutor would do.


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "It is appalling to think that the chief law enforcement officer of our state would be more concerned with enforcing a procedural rule than pursuing justice in a murder case. Courts and prosecutors often set aside procedural time limits where necessary to avoid a miscarriage of justice. No experienced prosecutor would advocate against doing so in a case like Johnson’s.  If Eric Schmitt had spent any time in his career as a prosecutor, he would know that. That’s why the Circuit Attorney’s Office affirmatively waived the time limit to allow the court to hear the motion. Eric Schmitt should do the same.  When a prosecutor sees injustice being done, he should move heaven and earth to stop it. In this case, it is not too late."

----------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTARY: "Lamar Johnson deserves his day in court," by guest columnist Rich Finneran, published by The St. Louis  American  on December 11, 2019. ( Rich Finneran is a former assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri and a Democratic candidate for Missouri attorney general.)

GIST: "As a federal prosecutor, I was always taught that my job was not merely to obtain convictions, but to seek justice. It was just as much my duty to ensure that the innocent go free as that the guilty were brought to justice. That is why it is so troubling that Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt is fighting St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner’s efforts to obtain a new trial for Lamar Johnson. Johnson was convicted of murder in 1995. Since that conviction, two other men have confessed to the crime and denied Johnson’s involvement, and the Circuit Attorney Office’s Conviction Integrity Unit has uncovered additional information that was not known at the time of trial — including direct payments made to an eyewitness and the relevant criminal history of a jailhouse informant. That is the sort of evidence that prosecutors are constitutionally and ethically required to reveal before taking a defendant to trial. In light of this new evidence, the circuit attorney moved for a new trial for Johnson. That is what any ethical prosecutor would do.  But then Attorney General Eric Schmitt stepped in and argued that a new trial was inappropriate because the motion had not been filed within 15 days of the verdict.  It is appalling to think that the chief law enforcement officer of our state would be more concerned with enforcing a procedural rule than pursuing justice in a murder case. Courts and prosecutors often set aside procedural time limits where necessary to avoid a miscarriage of justice. No experienced prosecutor would advocate against doing so in a case like Johnson’s.  If Eric Schmitt had spent any time in his career as a prosecutor, he would know that. That’s why the Circuit Attorney’s Office affirmatively waived the time limit to allow the court to hear the motion. Eric Schmitt should do the same.  When a prosecutor sees injustice being done, he should move heaven and earth to stop it. In this case, it is not too late. Eric Schmitt should withdraw his opposition to the circuit attorney’s motion and let Lamar Johnson have his day in court. No innocent person should have to sit in prison for 24 years because of a technicality. And no real prosecutor would stand for it."

The entire commentary can be read at:
http://www.stlamerican.com/news/columnists/guest_columnists/lamar-johnson-deserves-his-day-in-court/article_015973de-1c7d-11ea-a23c-3feb7dd25e87.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;