QUOTES OF THE DAY: "There
are definitely people serving long sentences, life sentences, for what I
believe is bad science and bad medicine,” said Akron attorney Andrea
Whitaker, who has defended about 10 shaken baby cases, including the
Dunkles. "There's no question in my mind that there are innocent people in prison from the misdiagnosis.” Shaken
Baby grew prominent in the 1990s, accentuated by the trial of British
au pair, Louise Woodward. Afterward,
the diagnosis of cases exploded, most notably around Akron, ranking the
area third in the entire nation. Much of the credit went to Dr.
Steiner, who gained national fame as an expert of shaken baby. One
doctor testified in a hearing that Steiner became “cavalier” in his
shaken baby work. "The
pediatrician would become the doctor, the prosecutor, the police
officer and the jury,” said Donald Caster, an attorney with the Ohio
Innocence Project. “The pediatrician would say this is abuse and that
put a parent or caregiver’s life into a living hell.""
-----------------------------------------------------------
ANOTHER QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Attorneys say there are others across the country who are wrongly convicted. "There
are dozens of people in ohio who have been wrongly convicted of abuse
based on the shaken baby hypothesis,” Caster said. "These are men and
women who have been separated from their families for decades because of
false claims by science.”
-----------------------------------------------------------
PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "There
are definitely people serving long sentences, life sentences, for what I
believe is bad science and bad medicine,” said Akron attorney Andrea
Whitaker, who has defended about 10 shaken baby cases, including the
Dunkles. "There's no question in my mind that there are innocent people in prison from the misdiagnosis.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
STORY: "3News investigates science behind shaken baby syndrome" by reporters Phil Trexler and Rachel Polansky, published by WKYC on February 24, 2020. (
Phil Trexler is an Investigative Producer at wkyc studios in Cleveland, Ohio - Rachel Polansky is a 3News investigative reporter). Thanks to Dr. Michael Bowers of CSIDDS - Forensics and law in focus - for bringing this important article to our attention. (Dr. Bowers reports that "a cavalier and long time shaken baby expert will not admit his decades of misdiagnosis" - and notes, "Dr.Steiner's "saving the kids" mantra was later adopted by the bitemarkers.")
https://csidds.com/2020/02/25/forensics-a-cavalierand-long-time-shaken-baby-expert-will-not-admit-his-decades-of-misdiagnoses/
SUB-HEADING: "Many cases are unraveling, while others accused remain imprisoned."
GIST: "When Dan and Lee-Ann Dunkle look at their daughter, they see a soaring athletic teen, an honor roll scholar. They certainly don’t see a victim of shaken baby syndrome. But once upon a time, that's all doctors saw. Turns out, those doctors were dead wrong. Despite the passing years, the sting of that failed diagnosis isn't soothed. Instead, tearful memories flood a mother's thoughts. "I couldn't take my kid home. They said I would be arrested if I did.
And that's when we were like, wait a minute, what's going on here." She soon learned. The
Dunkles were at Akron Children's Hospital, where renowned pediatric
doctor Daryl Steiner was uncovering case after case of shaken baby
syndrome. Reached by phone, Dr. Steiner told 3News Investigates: “I’m retired and I’ve forgotten everything prior to 2016.” Today, shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma is a hotly debated diagnosis, both in the medical and the legal communities. More
than 200 criminal cases are unraveling across the nation since 2001,
according to an extensive study by the Washington Post and journalism
students at Northwestern University. Over 1,600 cases, however, were left intact, leaving others to make pleas of innocence from behind bars. "There
are definitely people serving long sentences, life sentences, for what I
believe is bad science and bad medicine,” said Akron attorney Andrea
Whitaker, who has defended about 10 shaken baby cases, including the
Dunkles. "There's no question in my mind that there are innocent people in prison from the misdiagnosis.” Shaken Baby grew prominent in the 1990s, accentuated by the trial of British au pair, Louise Woodward. Afterward,
the diagnosis of cases exploded, most notably around Akron, ranking the
area third in the entire nation. Much of the credit went to Dr.
Steiner, who gained national fame as an expert of shaken baby. One doctor testified in a hearing that Steiner became “cavalier” in his shaken baby work. "The
pediatrician would become the doctor, the prosecutor, the police
officer and the jury,” said Donald Caster, an attorney with the Ohio
Innocence Project. “The pediatrician would say this is abuse and that
put a parent or caregiver’s life into a living hell."
Steiner espoused a triad theory when looking for signs of abuse:
Bleeding in the brain and behind the eyes, and swelling of the brain. Critics
contend that when Steiner spotted the three symptoms, he immediately
concluded the baby was shaken. To answer the critics, abusive head
trauma was added to the diagnosis. In recent years, however, the
science is shifting. Some doctors have recanted their original findings.
Others are recognizing other causes, such as simple falls or damage
done to a child’s skull during birth. Studies show about 25 percent of
births result in head trauma. Today, the Ohio Innocence Project is
working with two women serving life sentences: Tiffani Calise and
Marsha Mills. In each case, Dr. Steiner worked the cases. Calise,
29, was convicted in the 2010 death of a 2-year-old toddler she was
babysitting at a Green condo. Calise contends the girl slipped and fell
in the bathtub Mills, 69, was convicted in the 2006 death of a
2-year-old boy, who she said fell down several stairs at her home in New
Philadelphia. Attorneys say there are others across the country who are wrongly convicted. "There
are dozens of people in ohio who have been wrongly convicted of abuse
based on the shaken baby hypothesis,” Caster said. "These are men and
women who have been separated from their families for decades because of
false claims by science.” The Dunkles came close to being one such family. In 2006, they lost custody of their newborn. The separation lasted four months. It began when the infant girl fell three feet from a table. To be safe, the Wadsworth couple took her to children's hospital. "It was a very bad decision for us on our part,” Lee-Ann Dunkle said. At
the hospital. baby Rachel was examined by Dr. Steiner, who quickly
rendered a startling diagnosis: Rachel was another victim of shaken baby
syndrome. The Dunkles were told Rachel's future brain development was forever altered by this physical abuse. "I thought they got it, it was mix up, it was a mistake, there's no way she was shaken," Lee-Ann Dunkle said. Nonetheless, the diagnosis set in motion a series of events. Step
one: baby Rachel was taken away by children services. It happened when
the Dunkles met with police, leaving their daughter at the hospital with
her grandmother. "I was on the phone with mom when it happened. and I told her, I said you have to let her go,” Lee-Ann Dunkle recalled. What followed was months of costly and contentious court hearings and competing medical opinions. Finally.."I
get goose bumps thinking about it,” said Whitaker, who got the call
from the Medina judge’s staff. She then called the Dunkles with the
news. But there was nothing else... not even an apology. "It's like it happened for no reason,” she said. Their ordeal is why the Dunkles want to tell their story about shaken baby syndrome. To help others wrongly accused."
The entire story can be read at:
https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/investigations/3news-investigates-science-behind-shaken-baby-cases-under-attack/95-049076b8-261c-41d7-87b2-a631864b2e6f
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
------------------------------------------------------------------