Steiner espoused a triad theory when looking for signs of abuse: Bleeding in the brain and behind the eyes, and swelling of the brain. Critics contend that when Steiner spotted the three symptoms, he immediately concluded the baby was shaken. To answer the critics, abusive head trauma was added to the diagnosis. In recent years, however, the science is shifting. Some doctors have recanted their original findings. Others are recognizing other causes, such as simple falls or damage done to a child’s skull during birth. Studies show about 25 percent of births result in head trauma. Today, the Ohio Innocence Project is working with two women serving life sentences: Tiffani Calise and Marsha Mills. In each case, Dr. Steiner worked the cases. Calise, 29, was convicted in the 2010 death of a 2-year-old toddler she was babysitting at a Green condo. Calise contends the girl slipped and fell in the bathtub Mills, 69, was convicted in the 2006 death of a 2-year-old boy, who she said fell down several stairs at her home in New Philadelphia. Attorneys say there are others across the country who are wrongly convicted. "There are dozens of people in ohio who have been wrongly convicted of abuse based on the shaken baby hypothesis,” Caster said. "These are men and women who have been separated from their families for decades because of false claims by science.” The Dunkles came close to being one such family. In 2006, they lost custody of their newborn. The separation lasted four months. It began when the infant girl fell three feet from a table. To be safe, the Wadsworth couple took her to children's hospital. "It was a very bad decision for us on our part,” Lee-Ann Dunkle said. At the hospital. baby Rachel was examined by Dr. Steiner, who quickly rendered a startling diagnosis: Rachel was another victim of shaken baby syndrome. The Dunkles were told Rachel's future brain development was forever altered by this physical abuse. "I thought they got it, it was mix up, it was a mistake, there's no way she was shaken," Lee-Ann Dunkle said. Nonetheless, the diagnosis set in motion a series of events. Step one: baby Rachel was taken away by children services. It happened when the Dunkles met with police, leaving their daughter at the hospital with her grandmother. "I was on the phone with mom when it happened. and I told her, I said you have to let her go,” Lee-Ann Dunkle recalled. What followed was months of costly and contentious court hearings and competing medical opinions. Finally.."I get goose bumps thinking about it,” said Whitaker, who got the call from the Medina judge’s staff. She then called the Dunkles with the news. But there was nothing else... not even an apology. "It's like it happened for no reason,” she said. Their ordeal is why the Dunkles want to tell their story about shaken baby syndrome. To help others wrongly accused."

The entire story can be read at:
https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/investigations/3news-investigates-science-behind-shaken-baby-cases-under-attack/95-049076b8-261c-41d7-87b2-a631864b2e6f
 
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
------------------------------------------------------------------