Wednesday, October 7, 2020

Jerome Kowalski: Michigan: False confession case: (This is the really off-the-wall case I have been following in which it turned out that the lead detective who took the subsequently denied alleged confession was having a (quite understandably) 'undisclosed' relationship with the judge who presided over his first trial.) Development: "An expert on false confessions will be allowed to testify during a new trial for a man convicted of two murders but whose conviction was vacated last year amid the fallout from judicial misconduct proceedings against former judge Theresa Brennan. Shiawassee County Circuit Court Judge Matthew Stewart ruled expert witness Richard Ofshe could testify about the generalities of false confessions, but cannot testify on any case-specific testimony related to Jerome Kowalski's criminal case. Kowalski was charged after his sister-in-law and brother, Brenda and Richard Kowalski, were murdered in their home in 2008. He subsequently both confessed and denied committing the crime."


This Blog is interested in false confessions because of the disturbing number of exonerations in the USA, Canada and multiple other jurisdictions throughout the world, where, in the absence of incriminating forensic evidence the conviction is based on self-incrimination – and because of the growing body of  scientific research showing how vulnerable suspects are to widely used interrogation methods  such as  the notorious ‘Reid Technique.’ As  all too many of this Blog's post have shown, I also recognize that pressure for false confessions can take many forms, up to and including physical violence, even physical and mental torture.

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog:

-----------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “We are pleased that the Court has recognized that false confessions do exist and that the jury will get to hear the science behind that fact," said Heather Nalley, one of Kowalski's attorneys. "We are disappointed that the court has precluded the expert from testifying as to police misconduct in this case.  At this time, we are considering our situation and appeal options.”


---------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Judge: False confession expert can testify during Kolwalski murder trial,"  by Reporter Kayla  Daugherty, published by  The Livingston Daily on October 6, 2020.


GIST: "An expert on false confessions will be allowed to testify during a new trial for a man convicted of two murders but whose conviction was vacated last year amid the fallout from judicial misconduct proceedings against former judge Theresa Brennan.


Shiawassee County Circuit Court Judge Matthew Stewart ruled expert witness Richard Ofshe could testify about the generalities of false confessions, but cannot testify on any case-specific testimony related to Jerome Kowalski's criminal case. 


Kowalski was charged after his sister-in-law and brother, Brenda and Richard Kowalski, were murdered in their home in 2008. He subsequently both confessed and denied committing the crime. 


Kowalski's original attorney, Wally Piszczatowski, sought a false confession expert to testify during the first trial. The presiding judge, Brennan, denied the request, a decision that was affirmed on appeal. 


Kowalski was convicted of the murders in 2013 and sentenced to life in prison by Brennan. 


His conviction was vacated in January of 2019 after the Michigan Supreme Court found Brennan failed to disclose her relationship with the lead investigator in the murders, Michigan State Police Sgt. Sean Furlong. 


Jerome Kowalski confessed to the murders in an interview conducted by Furlong in the days following the murders.  


Kowalski was also granted a new trial in January of 2019. 


“We are pleased that the Court has recognized that false confessions do exist and that the jury will get to hear the science behind that fact," said Heather Nalley, one of Kowalski's attorneys. "We are disappointed that the court has precluded the expert from testifying as to police misconduct in this case.  At this time, we are considering our situation and appeal options.”


Livingston County Prosecutor William Vailliencourt had opposed Ofshe being allowed to testify. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. 


False confessions:


Earlier this year Genesee County Circuit Court Judge David Newblatt ruled Ofshe could testify as an expert witness concerning false confessions and police interrogation methods in an unrelated criminal case in that county.


Similar to Stewart's ruling, Ofshe will not be allowed to specifically discuss the confession in that case, which involved a former Genesee County Sheriff’s deputy, charged with sexually assaulting a female in his custody.


In 2012, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled false-confession experts can testify under certain circumstances.


"We hold that because the claim of a false confession is beyond the common knowledge of the ordinary person, expert testimony about this phenomenon is admissible under MRE 702 when it meets the other requirements of MRE 702," the court wrote in its July 2012 opinion. "We caution, however, that like other expert testimony explaining counterintuitive behavior, the admissibility of expert testimony pertaining to false confessions is not without limitations."


Future court dates were not available Tuesday morning. 


Kowalski faces up to life in prison if convicted as charged."


The entire story can be read at:

3635816001

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
----------------------------------------------------------