Sunday, January 24, 2021

Dion Harrell: RIP: New Jersey: Such a terribly sad story. It truly belongs in our 'enough to make one weep' department. Apart from the fact that the wrongful rape conviction haunted him for the rest of his all-too short life, the thought that he had to fight for 20 years to get the DNA testing - even after he got out of prison - is infuriating. Also infuriating, is the sorely flawed forensic evidence that led to his wrongful conviction in the first place - as evidenced by the entry by Maurice Possley in The Registry of Exonerations, which I have included below.. (HL)


WORDS TO HEED: FROM OUR POST ON KEVIN COOPER'S  APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING (CALIFORNIA):
"Blogger/extraordinaire Jeff Gamso's blunt, unequivocal, unforgettable message to the powers that be in California: "JUST TEST THE FUCKING DNA." (Oh yes, Gamso raises, as he does in many of his posts, an important philosophical question: This post is headed: "What is truth, said jesting Pilate.")..."So what's the harm? What, exactly, are they scared of? Don't we want the truth?" 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "His first victory came in 2016, when the Innocence Project obtained DNA testing showing Harrell was not the rapist state prosecutors made him out to be. “He was such a dedicated advocate,” said Michelle Feldman, the state campaigns director at the Innocence Project, who appeared alongside Harrell at public hearings in recent years, where Harrell and other advocates pleaded with lawmakers to beef up protections for people who may have been wrongly convicted. “He fought for two decades to get DNA testing, even after he got out of prison. He knew he was innocent and wanted to clear his name.”


--------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The indignities of his wrongful conviction continued long after his 1988 trial." Last year, an appeals court denied him compensation for his time behind bars based on a legal technicality. Gov. Phil Murphy’s administration spent two years fighting his claim for compensation under New Jersey’s Mistaken Imprisonment Act, arguing he filed for it too late. Facing scrutiny over the legal fight, state authorities relented and settled with Harrell last year. The sum was not disclosed, but under state law he was entitled to $50,000 for every year he spent locked up. He just received payment in April. “It’s just a tragic end to a tragic story,” said state Sen. Declan O’Scanlon, R-Monmouth, one of several lawmakers who introduced legislation geared toward correcting wrongful convictions that was inspired by Harrell’s case. “His memory will live on and it will benefit other people,” O’Scanlon said. “God willing, not many — we don’t want any wrongful convictions — but when they happen, they need to be corrected."


---------------------------------------



STORY: "N.J. man dies suddenly after winning decades-long fight to clear his name  and help wrongly convicted," by reporter S.P. Sullivan, published by N.J. Com on January 22, 2020.


GIST: "Dion Harrell never had much in this world, but when New Jersey’s justice system took his freedom and left him with a scarlet letter, he fought like hell to get his life back.


He died suddenly Jan. 15.


He was found outside his Long Branch home. No foul play was suspected, and Harrell’s family said they believe he suffered a medical episode.


He was 53.


Harrell was wrongly convicted of raping a 17-year-old girl in 1988, a case of mistaken identity. He served four years in prison and spent more than two decades on a sex offender registry, trying to clear his name.


His first victory came in 2016, when the Innocence Project obtained DNA testing showing Harrell was not the rapist state prosecutors made him out to be.


“He was such a dedicated advocate,” said Michelle Feldman, the state campaigns director at the Innocence Project, who appeared alongside Harrell at public hearings in recent years, where Harrell and other advocates pleaded with lawmakers to beef up protections for people who may have been wrongly convicted.


“He fought for two decades to get DNA testing, even after he got out of prison. He knew he was innocent and wanted to clear his name.”


Harrell’s conviction haunted him for the rest of his life, said his cousin, Bryan Brodie. As the family was awaiting the results of his autopsy, Brodie said, “He was dealing with a lot of demons from this case, and that’s what ultimately killed him.”


He loved his two children and three grandchildren, Brodie said, and he enjoyed fishing, working on cars and watching basketball.


“Dion was a kind person, a giving person,” his cousin said. Brodie recounted a story he heard in recent days from a friend: Harrell had spent the night at his friend’s house, but departed early in the morning. He left behind a thank-you note and a $100 bill.


“That’s the type of guy he was,” Brodie said.


Harrell was not a rich man.


He was twice convicted of failing to comply with the onerous rules of the sex offender registry program, struggled to find jobs and housing, and couldn’t even be around his own children without supervision before his conviction was overturned.


“People looked at me the wrong way,” Harrell told NJ Advance Media last year. “I come to a barbecue, people say, ‘Watch out for the kids, he’s here.’”


The indignities of his wrongful conviction continued long after his 1988 trial.


Last year, an appeals court denied him compensation for his time behind bars based on a legal technicality. Gov. Phil Murphy’s administration spent two years fighting his claim for compensation under New Jersey’s Mistaken Imprisonment Act, arguing he filed for it too late.


Facing scrutiny over the legal fight, state authorities relented and settled with Harrell last year. The sum was not disclosed, but under state law he was entitled to $50,000 for every year he spent locked up.


He just received payment in April.


“It’s just a tragic end to a tragic story,” said state Sen. Declan O’Scanlon, R-Monmouth, one of several lawmakers who introduced legislation geared toward correcting wrongful convictions that was inspired by Harrell’s case.


“His memory will live on and it will benefit other people,” O’Scanlon said. “God willing, not many — we don’t want any wrongful convictions — but when they happen, they need to be corrected.""


The entire story can be read at:


--------------------------------------------------------------------

Read the National Registry of Exonerations entry by Maurice Possley at the link below:

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "In 1997, while still in prison, Harrell wrote to the Innocence Project in New York requesting DNA testing. The Innocence Project, which has a backlog of more than 10,000 such requests, agreed to take on his case in 2013. An investigation of the case showed that the crime lab analyst’s testimony was erroneous. It was not the case that 98 percent of the male population could be eliminated as the source of the sample. In fact, none of the male population could be excluded, the evidence showed. Dr. Joseph Warren, an expert in forensic biology, examined the laboratory reports and the trial transcript and concluded that the prosecution’s crime lab analyst had made “egregious misstatements of conventional serology and statistics” which were “contrary to scientific principles generally accepted at the time (and today).”

-------------------------------------------------------

ENTRY: "Not long after 10 p.m. on September 18, 1988, a 17-year-old girl was walking home from her job at a McDonald’s restaurant in Long Branch, New Jersey, when a man dragged her off the street and raped her.

Three days later, she saw 22-year-old Dion Harrell in the parking lot of the McDonald’s and believed he was her attacker. Police picked up Harrell and brought him to a police station where Harrell protested his innocence. He pleaded with the police to take him to see the victim under the belief that if she saw him, she would realize her mistake. Although this was not typical procedure, the police finally relented and took Harrell into the room where the victim was and she confirmed her identification of him as the rapist.

Harrell was charged with second-degree sexual assault and third-degree theft. He went to trial in Monmouth County Circuit Court in May 1992.

The victim identified him as her attacker. A New Jersey State Police crime laboratory analyst testified that based on blood typing analysis, Harrell was among only 2 percent of the population who could not be eliminated as the source of the semen found in a rape kit. DNA testing was not available at that time in New Jersey.

Harrell testified and denied the attack. He said that on the night of the rape, he played basketball with a group of friends, including a police detective, and later rode his bicycle with a nephew to a friend’s house where he remained until he went home about 12:30 a.m. The detective testified that he had played basketball with Harrell on several occasions, but could not remember if he played with Harrell on the night of the rape. Harrell’s mother and sister testified that he came home from basketball, showered and went to his friend’s house with his nephew around 10:30. A woman testified she saw Harrell and his nephew riding their bikes and the friend testified that Harrell and the nephew were at his house until 12:30 a.m. 

On May 19, 1992, the jury convicted Harrell of second-degree sexual assault and acquitted him of the theft charge. Harrell was sentenced to eight years in prison.

He was released on parole after four years in prison and was required to register as a sex offender. Over the next several years, he was twice convicted of failing to properly register and was sentenced to probation. He drifted in and out of homelessness and was unable to get and maintain a job because he was on the sex offender registry.

In 1997, while still in prison, Harrell wrote to the Innocence Project in New York requesting DNA testing. The Innocence Project, which has a backlog of more than 10,000 such requests, agreed to take on his case in 2013. An investigation of the case showed that the crime lab analyst’s testimony was erroneous. It was not the case that 98 percent of the male population could be eliminated as the source of the sample. In fact, none of the male population could be excluded, the evidence showed.

Dr. Joseph Warren, an expert in forensic biology, examined the laboratory reports and the trial transcript and concluded that the prosecution’s crime lab analyst had made “egregious misstatements of conventional serology and statistics” which were “contrary to scientific principles generally accepted at the time (and today).”

In November 2013, the Innocence Project sought the physical evidence in the case from the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office. Officials said the evidence no longer existed. However, in the fall of 2014, the Prosecutor’s Office said it had located slides made from the rape kit.

However, the prosecution opposed testing the evidence on the basis that state law only allowed testing if defendants were in custody. Attorney Vanessa Potkin, Director of Post-Conviction Litigation for the Innocence Project, argued that spending 20 years on a sex offender registry restricted his life made it fundamentally unfair to deny him evidence that could prove his innocence, and that long-established common law also provided an avenue for the court to order testing. Moreover, Potkin noted that the National District Attorney’s Association had adopted a policy that DNA testing should be performed in any case at any stage, even after all appeals had been exhausted, if the testing could determine innocence.

In February 2015, two weeks before a judge was to rule on the motion for testing, the Prosecutor’s Office agreed to allow the testing to be performed.

While the testing was being performed, the Innocence Project’s policy reform team worked to change the law in New Jersey. In November 2015, the state expanded the law to allow for DNA testing for defendants after their prison terms are over.

In July 2016, the DNA test results excluded Harrell as the rapist and the prosecution said it would ask that Harrell’s conviction be vacated.

On August 3, 2016, the conviction was vacated and the case was dismissed. The prosecution also requested that his two convictions for failing to register be vacated. That motion was granted and those charges also were dismissed.

In July 2018, Harrell filed a federal civil rights lawsuit seeking compensation for his wrongful conviction. In August 2018, Harrell filed a claim for compensation with the state of New Jersey. In June 2020, the claim was settled for $250,000.

In January 2021, Harrell passed away in Long Branch, New Jersey."



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------