INTRODUCTION: "Mothers were blamed for their babies' deaths while fatal issues with care went ignored over decades, a damning report into the biggest maternity scandal in the NHS (National Health Service) has concluded. The review into failings at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust found that 300 babies had died or suffered a brain injury as a result of poor care. Maternity expert Donna Ockenden, who led the inquiry, warned that poor treatment was still an issue at the trust despite calling for immediate action to be carried out after the initial findings in 2020. ----------------------------------------------------------- QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Health secretary Sajid Javid told the Commons on Wednesday that in one case important clinical information had been kept on Post-it notes, which were then binned by cleaners." ----------------------------------------------------------- PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Investigations into cases revealed more than 200 avoidable deaths, including 131 stillbirths and 70 neonatal deaths. There were a further 29 cases of severe brain damage and 65 cases of cerebral palsy. Nine women were also found to have died following mistakes. Parents failed by the trust told The Independent they suffered “inhumanity” and “cruelty beyond comprehension” as they were blamed for the deaths of their babies. The families say they weren’t listened to and called for an independent board to scrutinise hospitals’ implementation of the recommendations. Health secretary Sajid Javid said the report was a “devastating account of bedrooms that are empty, families that are bereft and loved ones taken before their time”. ------------------------------------------------------------------- STORY: "Shrewsbury Maternity Inquiry: 'Cruelty beyond comprehension' as mothers blamed for babies' deaths," The Independent (Health Correspondent Rebecca Thomas) reports. SUB-HEADING: "Donna Ockenden warns of ongoing care failings as staff told her they still fear speaking out." GIST: "Mothers were blamed for their babies’ deaths while fatal issues with care went ignored over decades, a damning report into the biggest maternity scandal in the NHS has concluded. The review into failings at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust found that 300 babies had died or suffered a brain injury as a result of poor care. Maternity expert Donna Ockenden, who led the inquiry, warned that poor treatment was still an issue at the trust despite calling for immediate action to be carried out after the initial findings in 2020. Systemic issues at the trust were highlighted by Ms Ockendenas as long ago as November 2019 in her interim report, revealed by The Independent. But she said maternity staff had told her they still had concerns over the level of care today. Families said they suffered “cruelty beyond comprehension” as their concerns were not addressed and some deaths were not investigated. Health secretary Sajid Javid told the Commons on Wednesday that in one case important clinical information had been kept on Post-it notes, which were then binned by cleaners. The investigation into 1,486 families’ cases, which began in 2017, found:
Ms Ockenden, chair of the review, told The Independent said she’d had staff as recently as Tuesday reach out to say they were “frightened to speak out” and “fearful of their job”. The chair made clear there were ongoing concerns over care at the trusts despite an initial review in 2020 calling for actions to improve. Ms Ockenden said it was “astounding” that for more than two decades the failings had not been challenged internally by the trust and that external healthcare bodies did not hold it to account. She made clear there were ongoing concerns over care at the trust despite an initial review in 2020 demanding improvements and also warned the failures at Shrewsbury could “potentially be replicated elsewhere” outside of maternity services. Investigations into cases revealed more than 200 avoidable deaths, including 131 stillbirths and 70 neonatal deaths. There were a further 29 cases of severe brain damage and 65 cases of cerebral palsy. Nine women were also found to have died following mistakes. Parents failed by the trust told The Independent they suffered “inhumanity” and “cruelty beyond comprehension” as they were blamed for the deaths of their babies. The families say they weren’t listened to and called for an independent board to scrutinise hospitals’ implementation of the recommendations. Health secretary Sajid Javid said the report was a “devastating account of bedrooms that are empty, families that are bereft and loved ones taken before their time”. Mr Javid said actions set out by Ms Ockenden would be accepted and offered reassurances that the individuals who were responsible for the “serious and repeated failures” will be held to account. The Ockenden review was first commissioned by former health secretary Jeremy Hunt in 2017 and originally covered 23 families. In 2019 The Independent revealed initial findings of the review had identified more than a dozen women and more than 40 babies died during childbirth. The review has multiple reports from parents who said women were “blamed” or “held responsible” after women and babies were harmed or died. Richard Stanton and Rhiannon Davies, whose daughter Kate died in March 2009, have been one of the key families leading the campaign for justice. According to the final Ockenden report two babies died in similar circumstances within the year prior to Kate’s death. Rhiannon Davies said there should be an independent whistleblowing line for staff to speak out and a panel to review each year’s progress against the Ockenden report recommendations. Kayleigh and Colin Griffiths, who have also been at the forefront of the review, lost their daughter Pippa in 2016. Speaking with The Independent they said: “We weren’t listened to and weren’t listened to by the trust, and they keep telling us that they’ve learned and today has shown us that even though they’re telling us they’ve implemented all the actions and staff are still coming forward. They haven’t learned and until they do that we’re not going to be satisfied.” Despite warnings from the review chair of ongoing problems and that it had not implemented all previous recommendations, the trust’s chief executive Louise Barnett said on Wednesday it had delivered all of the actions asked of it following the 2020 interim report. “We know that we still have much more to do to ensure we deliver the highest possible standard of care to the women and families we care for.” Former health secretary Jeremy Hunt said that because “culture of fear in the NHS” it has been left to the families to fight for justice. Mr Hunt told the Commons: “Today’s report goes beyond my darkest fears when I commissioned it as health secretary in 2016.” The final Ockenden review identifies at least eight regulators and external healthcare bodies investigated or highlighted concerns about care at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals Trust over 20 years. In 2021 senior NHS commissioning staff told reviewers they were aware of issues within the service from 2013 to 2020 but were assured by the trust of changes and told they were “limited in their power to change things for the better”. Healthwatch England, whose chair Sir Robert Francis led the public inquiry into failings at Mid Staffordshire, said the Ockenden report was “another scandal where it’s clear that lessons from past failures haven’t been learnt.” The body’s national director Louise Ansari added: “We also know the problems in maternity care don’t stop at Shrewsbury hospital, with investigations into failures to provide safe care to mothers and babies being recently carried out in other parts of the country.” The entire story can be read at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/shrewsbury-maternity-inquiry-cruelty-b2047507.html? ------------------------------------------------------------------ PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog; SEE BREAKDOWN OF SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG, AT THE LINK BELOW: HL: FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices." Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; ————————————————————————————————— FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true! Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project; |
Is The Age of Progressive Prosecutors Over?
21 hours ago
