Saturday, May 28, 2022

Trisha Woodworth; Indiana: Shaken Baby Syndrome case; Babysitter charged with causing an infant's death; His lawyer's motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Jill Glick, of the University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital in Chicago who concluded Maci's injuries were consistent with the 'syndrome' - has been denied..."Hagberg told Lake Criminal Court Judge Samuel Cappas Glick's testimony during a hearing earlier this year was based on prejudice and bias, not reliable scientific principles. Lake County Supervisory Deputy Prosecutor Eric Randall said Glick has more than 30 years of experience as a pediatrician and has written peer-reviewed scholarly articles. Glick painted the defense's three experts at outliers with regard to their opinions on abusive head trauma, he said. "This was always 'a battle of the experts' case," Randall said. "We'll put our experts on. They'll put their experts on.” It's the jury's duty to decide which experts are more credible, he said."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Hagberg said the defense's position is that Maci died as a result of an injury she suffered four days before Woodworth called an ambulance for her. According to court records, Maci's parents told police a bruise on her forehead appeared after she accidentally fell and hit her head on a wood floor April 11, 2016, while playing with a "jump-a-roo." Police and prosecutors allege Woodworth caused the baby's injuries, because she was the only person with Maci in the hours before she called an ambulance April 15, 2016. Maci was taken to a local hospital and flown to Comer Children's Hospital, where she was declared brain dead April 17, 2016."

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Cappas said Glick was qualified to testify as an expert witness. One of the defense's experts testified there is a 50/50 split among experts in the field about the science upon which Glick based her opinion, the judge said. "It's for the jury to decide whom they will believe and whom they will not," Cappas said."

STORY: "Judge refuses to bar doctor's testimony during infant death trial, by Reporter Sarah Reese, published by NWI.com on May 11, 2022.

GIST: "A judge denied a motion Wednesday to exclude testimony from a doctor at a Chicago pediatric hospital during an upcoming trial for a woman charged with causing the death of an infant she was babysitting in 2016.


Trisha Woodworth, 31, of Calumet Township, has pleaded not guilty to multiple felony charges filed in connection with the death of 8-month-old Maci Moor in April 2016.


Woodworth's attorneys, Harold Hagberg and Andreas Kyres, filed a motion seeking to exclude the testimony of Dr. Jill Glick, who works for University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital in Chicago and concluded Maci's injuries were consistent with shaken baby syndrome.


Hagberg told Lake Criminal Court Judge Samuel Cappas Glick's testimony during a hearing earlier this year was based on prejudice and bias, not reliable scientific principles.


Lake County Supervisory Deputy Prosecutor Eric Randall said Glick has more than 30 years of experience as a pediatrician and has written peer-reviewed scholarly articles.


Glick painted the defense's three experts at outliers with regard to their opinions on abusive head trauma, he said.


"This was always 'a battle of the experts' case," Randall said. "We'll put our experts on. They'll put their experts on.”


It's the jury's duty to decide which experts are more credible, he said.


Cappas said Glick was qualified to testify as an expert witness.


One of the defense's experts testified there is a 50/50 split among experts in the field about the science upon which Glick based her opinion, the judge said.


"It's for the jury to decide whom they will believe and whom they will not," Cappas said.


Hagberg said the defense's position is that Maci died as a result of an injury she suffered four days before Woodworth called an ambulance for her.


According to court records, Maci's parents told police a bruise on her forehead appeared after she accidentally fell and hit her head on a wood floor April 11, 2016, while playing with a "jump-a-roo."


Police and prosecutors allege Woodworth caused the baby's injuries, because she was the only person with Maci in the hours before she called an ambulance April 15, 2016.


Maci was taken to a local hospital and flown to Comer Children's Hospital, where she was declared brain dead April 17, 2016.


Woodworth's jury trial is scheduled for the week of July 11."


The entire story can be read at:


https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/judge-refuses-to-bar-doctors-testimony-during-infant-death-trial/article_cee7c955-3846-5563-a1dc-65d87b6ae24e.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;