Thursday, August 4, 2022

Areli Carbajal Escobar: (Shuttered Austin Texas crime lab): Bulletin: Major Development: He is seeking a Supreme Court review based on allegedly flawed DNA evidence used by the beleaguered lab to send him to death row, KXAN (Reporter Grace Reader) reports..."In 2016, an audit found that APD lab technicians were using flawed science when calculating the odds of DNA results, possibly botching thousands of cases. Techs were also using expired materials during testing and there was at least one case where the evidence was contaminated. “What is perhaps most remarkable about this case is that the State itself—which secured the conviction—has now changed position and acknowledged that petitioner’s due process rights were violated and that a new trial is warranted,” ABA wrote in a 19-page amicus brief to the Supreme Court."


STORY: "Texas death row case could get Supreme Court review, Austin's faulty DNA lab the focus," by Reporter Grace Reader, published by Reporter Grace  Reader, published on July 29, 2022, by  KXAN  (in depth investigation) Austin.


 GIST: "The American Bar Association is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a Central Texas man another trial after he was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for sexually assaulting and fatally stabbing a 17-year-old girl in east Austin in 2009. 


The bar association is pointing to DNA evidence used in the trial, which was conducted at the Austin Police Departments now shuttered crime lab


In 2016, an audit found that APD lab technicians were using flawed science when calculating the odds of DNA results, possibly botching thousands of cases. Techs were also using expired materials during testing and there was at least one case where the evidence was contaminated.


“What is perhaps most remarkable about this case is that the State itself—which secured the conviction—has now changed position and acknowledged that petitioner’s due process rights were violated and that a new trial is warranted,” ABA wrote in a 19-page amicus brief to the Supreme Court. 


Areli Carbajal Escobar, 43, is on death row for the murder of 17-year-old Bianca Maldonado. During his trial, the state presented graphic evidence of the attack, saying the victim was found with 46 stab wounds. They also presented DNA evidence, which is in dispute here, and fingerprints from the crime scene. 


Escobar’s girlfriend at the time said she heard the attack on her cellphone, police reported. For the next 10 minutes, she said she heard the sound of a woman being raped. Escobar lived at the same apartment complex as Maldonado.


The murder happened in 2009, a jury decided Escobar was guilty in 2011. Escobar’s legal team has been fighting his conviction since. 


“I feel sad about all of this because I know we have to start over again, I know this is going to be hard not only for us but all of our family and people who know my sister,” said Magaly Maldonado, Bianca’s younger sister, in 2017 when Escobar appealed his conviction in Travis County. “This is going to bring tears again, it’s going to be really hard.”


The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has previously rejected attempts to get a new trial for Escobar, saying the DNA evidence was not central to securing Escobar’s conviction, according to the brief. It is unclear if the Supreme Court will take up the case."


The entire story can be read at: 


https://www.kxan.com/news/crime/texas-death-row-case-could-get-supreme-court-review-austins-faulty-dna-lab-the-focus/


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;