GIST: "Sacramento, CA – Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) introduced SB 912, the Requiring Objective and Accurate Drug Testing (ROAD Testing) Act. SB 912 prohibits law enforcement agencies from making arrests or filing charges on the basis of a color-based (colorimetric) drug test, a class of tests some jurisdictions use in the field to assess whether a substance contains an illegal compound, but which many jurisdictions have abandoned due to their extremely high error rate.
The bill does not ban the use of colorimetric tests, it only prevents officers from using them as the basis of arrest and charging decisions without verification from more accurate tests.
By preventing the improper use of these inaccurate tests, SB 912 eliminates the use of what appears to be the nation’s leading cause of wrongful convictions from the California criminal legal system.
A brand new report released from the University of Pennsylvania’s Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice found that colorimetric drug tests are the leading known cause of wrongful convictions in the country.
They found that, nationwide, approximately 773,000 people are arrested based on these
inaccurate tests, and 30,000 of those will be falsely implicated even though they do not possess illegal substances.
The tests have a false positive rate as high as 38% in some contexts, and in most cases no confirmatory tests are being used to verify the results of colorimetric tests. Cotton candy, powdered milk, sugar, lidocaine, folic acid vitamins, bird feces, and even a loved one’s ashes have produced positive results on colorimetric tests.
Because of the absurdly high rate of inaccuracies, and out of concern for officer safety, jurisdictions across California have led the way in abandoning colorimetric drug tests. The San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Tracy Police Departments; the Kings, Madera, and Siskiyou County Sheriffs; and the California Highway Patrol (CHP) instead use accurate handheld lab-standard devices that can identify an exact substance.
Yet many jurisdictions still rely on these outdated and inaccurate tools—of the 216,886 people arrested on drug charges in California each year, approximately 4,099 will be wrongfully arrested and charged based on the results of colorimetric drug tests.
The use of these inaccurate tests also fuels racial inequity in the criminal legal system—Black Americans are subject to erroneous colorimetric drug tests at three times the rate of their white counterparts.
“With accurate, scientific alternatives available, there is no reason to rely on junk colorimetric tests to make arrests when a suspicious substance is discovered in the field,” said Senator Wiener. “Bogus drug tests like these undermine basic principles of justice and fairness. The use of these wildly inaccurate drug tests—already abandoned by a number of major law enforcement agencies—is unacceptable now that the risk of wrongful conviction has been confirmed.”
Though practices vary considerably between jurisdictions, false positive results are leading to wrongful convictions across the country. In a survey of 82 police agencies in 38 states in 2022, 76.8% of respondents report that they currently use colorimetric field tests in drug arrests. Another study found 94.4% of respondents reported processing or charging drug cases in which presumptive field testing had been used to identify suspected controlled substances. In Georgia, a positive result from a colorimetric test can establish the presence of an illegal substance beyond a reasonable doubt.
The use of these tests is particularly problematic, given that 95% of criminal cases in the U.S. criminal legal system are resolved through plea deals. In another survey of 18 prosecutorial offices in 15 states, 89% reported that guilty pleas are permitted without confirmatory testing (for example, follow-up testing by a lab to verify a positive field test). The use of inaccurate colorimetric drug tests is almost certainly leading innocent people to plead guilty to possession of an illegal drug in order to avoid jail time or extended litigation.
SB 912 will preclude law enforcement agencies from using the results of a colorimetric field drug test to establish probable cause for arrest or the institution of charges for drug possession, conviction, or sentencing prior to a reliable confirmatory test from a crime laboratory.
SB 912 is sponsored by the Roadside Drug Test Innocence Alliance."
The entire story can be read at:
https://www.davisvanguard.org/2024/01/senator-wiener-introduces-bill-to-limit-use-of-inaccurate-roadside-drug-tests-a-leading-known-cause-of-wrongful-convictions-in-the-u-s/| PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog; |
SEE BREAKDOWN OF SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG, AT THE LINK BELOW: HL
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/47049136857587929
FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices.
Lawyer Radha Natarajan;
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
------------------------------------------------------------------
YET ANOTHER FINAL WORD:
David Hammond, one of Broadwater's attorneys who sought his exoneration, told the Syracuse Post-Standard, "Sprinkle some junk science onto a faulty identification, and it's the perfect recipe for a wrongful conviction.
