Sunday, August 23, 2026

August 23: Claude Paquin: Quebec: From our 'It's about time' department: As CBC Digital Journalist Annabelle Olivier reports, wrongfully convicted of a double murder (in a case tainted by the testimony of a "well-known police informant) - and acquitted 41 years later, he has reached a multimillion dollar settlement with Montreal and the provincial government.




PUBLISHER'S NOTE: What do police informants have to do with forensic science? (I'm glad you asked). Investigative  Reporter Pamela Colloff give us  a clue when she writes - at the link below -  "I’ve wanted to write about jailhouse informants for a long time because they often appear in troubled cases in which the other evidence is weak." That's my experience as  will as a criminal lawyer and an observer of criminal justice. Given the reality that jurors - thanks to the CSI effect - are becoming more and more insistent on the need for there to be forensic evidence, it is becoming more and more common for police to rely on shady tactics such as use of police snitches, staging lineups, coercing, inducing, or creating false confessions out of thin air, procuring false eyewitness testimony or concealing exculpatory evidence. 

---------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: (From this post):  Paquin was found guilty in 1983 of two counts of first-degree murder in connection with the deaths of Ronald Bourgouin and Sylvie Revah, a couple killed in 1978 in the Laurentians. Paquin spent 18 years in prison before being granted full parole in 2001 under strict release conditions, that remained in place for the next 23 years. In 2024, the federal justice minister ordered a retrial, saying that new information in the case showed that a "miscarriage of justice likely occurred."


----------------------------------

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "The lawsuit alleges police and the prosecution knew, as early as 1983, that the informant's testimony was false and that the only physical evidence allegedly linking Paquin to the crime had been fabricated or altered.  "This case is not merely a miscarriage of justice: it is the story of a stolen life, of a sentence that extended far beyond the prison walls. An existence confiscated," Paquin's lawyers argued in the lawsuit.  His lawyers also pointed to Paquin's "grim record for the longest unjustified deprivation of liberty ever documented in Quebec." 

--------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Man acquitted of double murder after 40 years reaches settlement with Montreal, Quebec," by Journalist Annabelle Olivier, published by CBC News, on 000.  (Annabelle Olivier is a digital journalist at CBC Montreal. She previously worked at Global News as an online producer.)

SUB-HEADING: "Claude Paquin spent more than 4 decades fighting to prove his innocence."

 PHOTO CAPTION: "Claude Paquin was 81 years old when he was acquitted of a double murder he had long insisted he never committed. 

GIST: "Claude Paquin, a Quebec man who was wrongfully convicted of a double murder and acquitted 41 years later, has reached a mulitimillion-dollar settlement with Montreal and the provincial government.

The three parties announced the settlement in a joint statement on Friday. 

"The City of Montreal and the Attorney General of Quebec hope that this agreement — which allows all parties to avoid a long trial this fall — will help Mr. Paquin turn the page on this difficult chapter of his life," the statement reads.

Paquin was found guilty in 1983 of two counts of first-degree murder in connection with the deaths of Ronald Bourgouin and Sylvie Revah, a couple killed in 1978 in the Laurentians.

Paquin spent 18 years in prison before being granted full parole in 2001 under strict release conditions, that remained in place for the next 23 years.

In 2024, the federal justice minister ordered a retrial, saying that new information in the case showed that a "miscarriage of justice likely occurred."

Paquin, now 83, was acquitted on Nov. 6, 2024,

At the time, Paquin said his acquittal would not have been possible without the work of his lawyers who are part of Projet Innocence Québec. 

The case against Paquin relied heavily on the testimony of Bernard Provençal, a well-known police informant. But over the years, Projet Innocence Québec found evidence that raised questions about his credibility. 

'The story of a stolen life'

Paquin, represented by lawyers at Woods LLP, filed a multimillion-dollar civil lawsuit in Quebec Superior Court in May 2025 against the City of Montreal and the Attorney General of Quebec for what the suit says were failings of their agents, including Montreal police, the Sûreté du Québec, and the Quebec Crown prosecutor's office.

The lawsuit alleges police and the prosecution knew, as early as 1983, that the informant's testimony was false and that the only physical evidence allegedly linking Paquin to the crime had been fabricated or altered. 

"This case is not merely a miscarriage of justice: it is the story of a stolen life, of a sentence that extended far beyond the prison walls. An existence confiscated," Paquin's lawyers argued in the lawsuit. 

His lawyers also pointed to Paquin's "grim record for the longest unjustified deprivation of liberty ever documented in Quebec." 

The lawsuit indicates Paquin had been seeking just over $89 million in damages. However, none of the parties involved would confirm the amount, citing a confidentiality clause in the agreement.

Because the lawsuit was settled, its claims were not tested in court, and the parties said they would not make further comment."

The entire story can be read at: 


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;