Saturday, August 1, 2026

August 1: David Wood: Death Row: Texas: The Death penalty Information Center's Anumta Ali zeroes in on the Marshall Projects Maurice Chammah who has built his brilliant Podcast 'The Last 12 Weeks, around the battle waged by his lawyers to. present new evidence and save his life, in the weeks leading up to David Woods 2025 execution date in Texas, noting that "In 2024, after los­ing all his appeals, Mr. Wood’s defense team obtained a sworn state­ment from pris­on­er George Hall which brought into ques­tion the legit­i­ma­cy of tes­ti­mo­ny from key pros­e­cu­tion tri­al wit­ness­es. Mr. Hall admit­ted that he and oth­er incar­cer­at­ed indi­vid­u­als were encour­aged by police to false­ly report that Mr. Wood con­fessed to com­mit­ting the Desert Murders in El Paso, Texas. Greg Wiercioch, Mr. Wood’s lead attor­ney, agreed to per­mit Mr. Chammah from The Marshall Project to cov­er the case. Through deeply vul­ner­a­ble accounts by mem­bers of Mr. Wood’s defense team, lis­ten­ers hear how they grap­pled with chal­leng­ing deci­sions, such as whether to vis­it the only liv­ing infor­mant in the hos­pi­tal, until he lat­er died from lung cancer."



LINK TO THE PODCAST: 


-------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: What do police informants have to do with forensic science? (I'm glad you asked). Investigative Reporter Pamela Colloff give us a clue when she writes - at the link below - "I’ve wanted to write about jailhouse informants for a long time because they often appear in troubled cases in which the other evidence is weak." That's my experience as will as a criminal lawyer and an observer of criminal justice. Given the reality that jurors - thanks to the CSI effect - are becoming more and more insistent on the need for there to be forensic evidence, it is becoming more and more common for police to rely on shady tactics such as use of police snitches, staging lineups, coercing, inducing, or creating false confessions out of thin air, procuring false eyewitness testimony or concealing exculpatory evidence. 

HARPLD LEVY:  The Charles Smith Blog; 

----------------------------------------------
-

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Mr. Wood spent over thir­ty years in prison and faced a pre­vi­ous exe­cu­tion date after being con­vict­ed in 1985 of mul­ti­ple killings that became known as ​“the Desert Murders.” After mul­ti­ple bod­ies were uncov­ered in the desert in El Paso, Texas, police and pros­e­cu­tors sought to deter­mine who was respon­si­ble, ulti­mate­ly using tes­ti­mo­ny from jail­house infor­mants as their key evi­dence. That same tes­ti­mo­ny was lat­er cast into doubt by Mr. Hall’s sworn statement. The series cov­ers the exten­sive efforts made by Mr. Wood’s team lead­ing up to his March 2025 exe­cu­tion date, which was halt­ed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) just two days before he was sched­uled to die. On July 30, 2025, the TCCA returned Mr. Wood’s case to the tri­al court to review his claims of inno­cence and ineffective representation."

----------------------------------------------


PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "In con­junc­tion with the release of the pod­cast, The New York Times and The Marshall Project have also released an analy­sis of more than 9,000 death sen­tences imposed over the last 50 years, using data from the Death Penalty Information Center and Professor Frank Baumgartner."

-----------------------------------------------


POST: “The Last 12 Weeks” Podcast Illuminates the Work of a Texas Capital Defense Team," by Researcher and writer, with special interest in Wrongful convictions, Anumta Ali, published on June 25, 2026.

GIST: "On June 18, 2026, The Marshall Project released ​“The Last 12 Weeks,” a pod­cast series detail­ing the weeks lead­ing up to David Wood’s 2025 exe­cu­tion date in Texas. The series fol­lows Mr. Wood’s defense team as they re-inves­ti­gate his case and iden­ti­fy evi­dence over­looked by state pros­e­cu­tors at tri­al. Hosted and report­ed by Maurice Chammah from The Marshall Project and Alvin Melathe from Serial Productions, the series gives a dynam­ic account of the usu­al­ly pri­vate per­spec­tive of cap­i­tal defense teams as they fight for an oppor­tu­ni­ty to present new evi­dence and stop their client’s execution.

“A stay is the best the lawyers can hope for here. For the court to say, ​‘Hold up, there’s some­thing poten­tial­ly wrong here. Let’s send the case to a low­er court to dig deep­er.’ It’s high­ly unlike­ly this court will sim­ply declare David Wood inno­cent, but a stay is still big. It means David Wood gets to live, and then his team can spend months or even years con­tin­u­ing to make the case for his innocence.”

MAURICE CHAMMAH, JOUR­NAL­IST WITH THE MARSHALL PROJECT

In 2024, after los­ing all his appeals, Mr. Wood’s defense team obtained a sworn state­ment from pris­on­er George Hall which brought into ques­tion the legit­i­ma­cy of tes­ti­mo­ny from key pros­e­cu­tion tri­al wit­ness­es. Mr. Hall admit­ted that he and oth­er incar­cer­at­ed indi­vid­u­als were encour­aged by police to false­ly report that Mr. Wood con­fessed to com­mit­ting the Desert Murders in El Paso, Texas. Greg Wiercioch, Mr. Wood’s lead attor­ney, agreed to per­mit Mr. Chammah from The Marshall Project to cov­er the case. Through deeply vul­ner­a­ble accounts by mem­bers of Mr. Wood’s defense team, lis­ten­ers hear how they grap­pled with chal­leng­ing deci­sions, such as whether to vis­it the only liv­ing infor­mant in the hos­pi­tal, until he lat­er died from lung cancer.

“I think it’s worth men­tion­ing here that all of the lawyers on this call have had clients who were exe­cut­ed. Clients who they could­n’t save. Greg, Jeremy, Naomi, they’ve all had to sit in front of some­one and tell them, ​‘We’re out of options.’ They’ve all had to watch what that does to a human being, tak­ing in the news that soon they’ll be killed. I know from sto­ries I’ve done in the past that the exe­cu­tion of a client is a shat­ter­ing event for habeas lawyers. One lawyer said that the final­i­ty of it is enough to give you ver­ti­go, to watch a per­son who you’ve built a rela­tion­ship with some­times over years, be reduced to a few file box­es you put into stor­age at the office.”

MAURICE CHAMMAH, JOUR­NAL­IST WITH THE MARSHALL PROJECT

Mr. Wood spent over thir­ty years in prison and faced a pre­vi­ous exe­cu­tion date after being con­vict­ed in 1985 of mul­ti­ple killings that became known as ​“the Desert Murders.” After mul­ti­ple bod­ies were uncov­ered in the desert in El Paso, Texas, police and pros­e­cu­tors sought to deter­mine who was respon­si­ble, ulti­mate­ly using tes­ti­mo­ny from jail­house infor­mants as their key evi­dence. That same tes­ti­mo­ny was lat­er cast into doubt by Mr. Hall’s sworn statement.

The series cov­ers the exten­sive efforts made by Mr. Wood’s team lead­ing up to his March 2025 exe­cu­tion date, which was halt­ed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) just two days before he was sched­uled to die. On July 30, 2025, the TCCA returned Mr. Wood’s case to the tri­al court to review his claims of inno­cence and ineffective representation.

In con­junc­tion with the release of the pod­cast, The New York Times and The Marshall Project have also released an analy­sis of more than 9,000 death sen­tences imposed over the last 50 years, using data from the Death Penalty Information Center and Professor Frank Baumgartner."

The entire Post can be read at:

https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/the-last-12-weeks-podcast-illuminates-the-work-of-a-texas-capital-defense-team

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;