Friday, January 12, 2018

Hassan Diab: Canada; Major Development: Bulletin: The Ottawa Citizen (Reporter Chris Cobb) reports that French courts have dropped terror allegations against the Ottawa professor. He is free but faces an appeal by prosecutors..."At its centre: Diab, who was indicted on murder, attempted murder and other charges related to an October 1980 bomb attack outside a Paris synagogue that killed four passers-by and injured dozens more. The bomb was planted in the saddle bag of a motor cycle parked outside the synagogue. The case has cast a spotlight on Canadian extradition law and the burden of proof required to send a citizen to face justice in another nation, and, on Friday, Trudeau hinted that his government is open reviewing that law. Diab has consistently denied involvement and said he was studying in Lebanon at the time of bombing. The investigating judges say have evidence that supports Diab’s claim of innocence."... "Anti-terrorism Judge Jean-Marc Herbaut, one of the investigative judges who dismissed the case against Diab on Friday, had previously ordered the academic’s release on bail, saying evidence he had gathered in Lebanon indicated that Diab was telling the truth and was not in Paris at the time of the bombing. Diab’s French lawyers said in a statement Friday that they respect the victims’ quest for justice, but the judges’ decision demonstrates the “impossibility to attribute to Hassan Diab any responsibility in the attack.” They had asked prosecutors to respect the judges’ ruling and not appeal."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: This is great news. Diab's lawyers had torn to shreds the so-called forensic evidence of a French handwriting 'expert' on a crucial piece of evidence. Canada should have stuck up for him. As this Bog's many posts on the Diab matter made clear, these flaws were recognized by the Judge who conducted the extradition hearing. But the Canadian government - to its shame - deported him anyway. The Trudeau government can start to make amends by pressuring the French government to drop the threat of appeal and allow his immediate return to Canada.

Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.

-----------------------------------------------------------

PHOTO CAPTION: "Former Ottawa university professor Hassan Diab is to be a free man for the   first time in a decade after two investigating judges dismissed terrorism allegations against him, effectively closing the case."



GIST: "Hassan Diab walked out of a Paris prison a free man Friday and into more uncertainty. The 64-year-old Ottawa academic was released from a Paris maximum security prison after anti-terrorism judges ruled that there was insufficient evidence to send him to trial. It is a precedent-setting decision that could, finally, mark the conclusion of Diab’s decade-long legal battle, one that has been fought against a backdrop of history, Western anxiety over terrorism and a fractious debate over due process. At its centre: Diab, who was indicted on murder, attempted murder and other charges related to an October 1980 bomb attack outside a Paris synagogue that killed four passers-by and injured dozens more. The bomb was planted in the saddle bag of a motor cycle parked outside the synagogue. The case has cast a spotlight on Canadian extradition law and the burden of proof required to send a citizen to face justice in another nation, and, on Friday, Trudeau hinted that his government is open reviewing that law. Diab has consistently denied involvement and said he was studying in Lebanon at the time of bombing. The investigating judges say have evidence that supports Diab’s claim of innocence. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau welcomed the judges’ decision. “We’ve been directly active on many, many consular cases with positive results,” he told reporters Friday in London, Ont. “Certainly this case is no different. We are pleased, obviously, that the French judicial system came to the conclusion that it did.” As for Canada’s controversial extradition law, which has come under constant criticism for being weak and inconsistent with the high standards of Canada’s criminal law, “We will be reflecting on lessons learned in the coming weeks and months,” Trudeau said. Diab’s Ottawa lawyer Don Bayne described the judges’ decision as “momentous.” “This is an order of final release,” he said. “There is no case against this man. It is over.” But Diab is still not totally free, conceded Bayne. “He can’t just go to the airport, buy a ticket and come home,” he said. Prosecutors immediately appealed Diab’s release Friday and lawyers representing victims of the bombing are expected to do the same. Prosecutors have admitted to flaws in the case but had petitioned the anti-terrorism judges to commit Diab to trial. Although free until higher courts rule on the appeals, it seems unlikely that Diab will be able to return to Canada, without official permission, until the appeal process has been exhausted. It is also likely that he is on a no-fly list and that alone could prove a significant obstacle to overcome. While ecstatic over Friday’s decision, the case has set so many legal precedents in France that Diab’s French lawyers are refusing to predict what might happen next. Lead lawyer William Bourdon has said that Diab is a prisoner of the current anti-terrorism climate in France and prosecutors are persisting in the case because they fear being branded as soft on terrorism. The academic was extradited in November 2014 at the request of France after a six-year legal battle to stay in Canada. He was flown to Paris within hours of the Supreme Court of Canada dashing his final hope by refusing to hear the case. The Lebanon-born Canadian citizen spent more than three years in pre-trial detention awaiting Friday’s decision. During his incarceration in France, eight judicial decisions ordering his release on bail were successfully appealed by prosecutors. Anti-terrorism Judge Jean-Marc Herbaut, one of the investigative judges who dismissed the case against Diab on Friday, had previously ordered the academic’s release on bail, saying evidence he had gathered in Lebanon indicated that Diab was telling the truth and was not in Paris at the time of the bombing. Diab’s French lawyers said in a statement Friday that they respect the victims’ quest for justice, but the judges’ decision demonstrates the “impossibility to attribute to Hassan Diab any responsibility in the attack.” They had asked prosecutors to respect the judges’ ruling and not appeal. After his 2008 arrest, Diab was jailed for several months at the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre before being released on conditions that amounted to strict house arrest. He was ordered to wear – and pay for – a $2,000 a month monitoring device on his ankle. In his 2011 ruling, Diab’s extradition judge Robert Maranger said it was unlikely that the evidence against Diab would have resulted in a conviction in a Canadian criminal court but the low threshold required by the extradition law gave him no choice but to recommend that the academic be turned over to France. Diab’s lawyer Bayne has been especially critical of the law which he says has been abused in the Diab case and has left Canadian citizens vulnerable. “It is a law and process that needs to be re-examined,” he said."
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/french-courts-drop-terror-allegations-against-ottawa-prof-hassan-diab

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog."

SBS Michigan; Judge to rule on request for new trial in case of father convicted in infant's deathJudge to rule on request for new trial in case of father convicted in infant's death


STORY: "Judge to rule on request for new trial in case of father convicted in infant's death," by  reporter Trace Christenson, published by The Battlecreek Inquirer on January 11, 2018.


GIST: "A Calhoun County judge will decide in a couple of months if a Battle Creek man convicted in connection with his son's death will receive a new trial. Shawn Brown, 33, is serving a sentence of eight to 30 years in prison after he was convicted of manslaughter and child abuse in the death Jan. 24, 2010 of his five-month old son, Shawn Brown Jr. Prosecutors alleged the child was shaken by his father two days before he died. But attorneys and student attorneys from the Michigan Innocence Clinic at the University of Michigan have argued Brown did not receive a fair trial because his defense attorney did not present a medical expert to refute prosecution testimony. The case is similar to the Calhoun County case of Leo Ackley who was convicted in 2011 in the death of his girlfriend's three-year old daughter. He was convicted of murder but the Michigan Supreme Court overturned that conviction because the defense did not present its own expert. Ackley was tried and convicted a second time in 2016 and is serving a life sentence. But judges across the state have concluded from several appellate decisions that defense attorneys should present experts. At a hearing Thursday lawyers for Brown presented a medical expert and Brown's trial attorney to convince Calhoun County Circuit Judge Sarah Lincoln that Brown should have a new trial. Attorney James Goulooze of Hastings told the judge he was hired by friends of Brown, who is indigent, and had no other money to hire an expert. The presiding judge at the trial in 2011 declined to provide county funds for a doctor to consult with Goulooze and testify for Brown. "I knew we needed an expert," Goulooze told Imran Syed, an attorney from the Innocence Clinic. "I knew there was controversy brewing in the medical community about Shaken Baby Syndrome. I knew I needed someone." Goulooze said he talked with a long-time friend who was a physician but not an expert in head trauma and did some of his own research. "I felt we could present a decent case," he said. "I would have preferred an expert. I was baffled by some of the medical testimony." He told Syed it was not a trial strategy to go without an expert. "There were no finances available." Dr. Joseph Scheller, a Baltimore doctor of pediatrics and neurology, testified there were more explanations for the baby's death than that he was shaken or struck in the head. He called shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma  "an idea that is still in flux." Scheller told student attorney Lauren Flamang that if called to testify at trial he could say the child suffered some trauma but that it might have been two weeks or two months before his death. The doctor, who studied the medical records, said he would have expected to find signs of external injury to the child's neck or skull or perhaps other broken bones. Instead the bleeding in the brain can be explained in other ways. "It could have been complications from a prior condition," the doctor said. He did acknowledge when questioned by Assistant Prosecutor Karen Palowski that the child could have been injured without outward signs of trauma if thrown against something soft or while wearing heavy clothes. Goulooze also testified he attempted to introduce an audio tape of an interview of Brown by police after he was told his son was dead and that he was being charged with murder. In the the recording, Brown is heard crying and telling the officer, "I didn't do anything. All I tried to do was save my son." Goulooze said the recording shows Brown was not indifferent to his son's death, as some prosecution witnesses had testified. Goulooze said the recording had been admitted but was then was stricken after a motion by prosecutors. "I felt the tape should have come in after the prosecutor showed apathy and lack of compassion. The tape  would have made a difference," he said. "I think the jury would have come back with a not guilty." Lincoln said both sides can submit briefs and rebuttals in the next six weeks and she will then issue a written opinion on the motion for a new trial."

The entire story can be read at: 
http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/story/news/2018/01/11/judge-rule-request-new-trial-case-father-convicted-infants-death/1026091001/

Kevin Keith; Ohio; Murder conviction upheld - in spite of his lawyers allegations that forensic analyst G. Michelle Yezzo, "was known to the state — though not to Mr. Keith — as someone who will stretch the truth to satisfy a department. Since the trial her forensic conclusions have proven faulty."... " Keith was scheduled to be executed Sept. 15, 2010, but Gov. Ted Strickland commuted his death sentence to a life sentence less than two weeks prior to that date, citing doubts about Keith's guilt, according to his attorneys."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Keith was scheduled to be executed Sept. 15, 2010, but Gov. Ted Strickland commuted his death sentence to a life sentence less than two weeks prior to that date, citing doubts about Keith's guilt, according to his attorneys. When filing the motion for a new trial, Keith's attorneys said G. Michele Yezzo, the state's expert, "provided the critical forensic conclusions regarding Mr. Keith" to try to link Keith to the crime scene.  "That expert was known to the state — though not to Mr. Keith —  as someone who will stretch the truth to satisfy a department. Since the trial her forensic conclusions have proven faulty," they said."

STORY: "Keith's murder conviction upheld," by reporter Zach Tuggle, published by The Telegraph Forum on December 26, 2017.

GIST: "The memory of three people shot to death in 1994 at Bucyrus Estates was on the forefront of residents' minds this summer when judges considered giving a new trial to the man convicted of killing them. Kevin Keith, 53, filed a motion seeking a new trial on Oct. 28, 2016, saying newly discovered evidence had turned up concerning a Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation forensic analyst who testified against him. The man's conviction was upheld in June by an appellate court in Lima, according to Crawford County Prosecutor Matt Crall. "My hope is that this is a day of finality and closure for the victims of this massacre," Crall said after the ruling. "Let this be a day of peace for Marichell Chatman, Linda Chatman, Marchae Reeves, who were all murdered by Kevin Keith. Richard Warren, Quanita Reeves and Quinton Reeves were also shot that night and survived their injuries. I pray that today offers their loved ones closure." Bucyrus police and Crawford County prosecutors said in 1994 that Keith opened fire on a group in retaliation for a drug arrest he blamed on an informant related to the shooting victims. Keith was scheduled to be executed Sept. 15, 2010, but Gov. Ted Strickland commuted his death sentence to a life sentence less than two weeks prior to that date, citing doubts about Keith's guilt, according to his attorneys. When filing the motion for a new trial, Keith's attorneys said G. Michele Yezzo, the state's expert, "provided the critical forensic conclusions regarding Mr. Keith" to try to link Keith to the crime scene.  "That expert was known to the state — though not to Mr. Keith —  as someone who will stretch the truth to satisfy a department. Since the trial her forensic conclusions have proven faulty," they said. Crall said Yezzo's employers at the Ohio Attorney General's Office had already reviewed her conduct and reinstated her to work prior to her testimony in the Keith case. Although he was not the county's prosecutor at the time of that decision, Crall said he would not see a need to disclose Yezzo's prior investigation if the Keith case were to be held today. Yezzo's testimony helped connect an important part of the trial. Crall said that as he was fleeing the scene of the murders, Keith drove into a snowbank — police found where his vehicle's license plate left an imprint into the snow. "They made a plaster casting of those license plate letters," Crall said. Yezzo did a forensic analysis of the license plate imprint, as well as the tire tracks that were discovered. In their June ruling, members of the appellate court wrote: "Over the years in his numerous appeals and post-conviction petitions Keith has challenged many aspects of his case and the evidence against him, but one fact remains clear, the evidence against Keith was simply overwhelming. Based on the record we cannot find that, even assuming Yezzo’s personnel file was suppressed, and that it contained information favorable to Keith, there is no reasonable possibility that the information contained in Yezzo’s file would have made any difference in the outcome of this case."Crall said Keith and his attorneys have appealed numerous portions of the case over the past two decades, and that his 2017 appeal process was one of his last options "to get back into court."

The entire story can be found at: 

http://www.bucyrustelegraphforum.com/story/news/2017/12/26/4-our-top-5-keiths-murder-conviction-upheld/981938001/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog."

Thursday, January 11, 2018

James Kluppelberg: Outdated arson 'science...abusive police behaviour leading to false confession...prosecutorial abuse. (Withholding of exculpatory evidence)...(This truly belongs in our 'read this and weep' department): Chicago officials have agreed to pay $9.3 million to a man wrongfully convicted of setting a 1984 fire that killed a mother and her five children, a crime he confessed to only after he was allegedly beaten by detectives working under disgraced Chicago police Cmdr. Jon Burge, The Chicago Tribune reports....From U.S. Registry of Exonerations: "The evolution of arson science had shown that the burn patterns cited as evidence of arson by Burns did not reliably indicate that a fire was deliberately set. These "indicators" are now considered to have no valid scientific basis. Moreover, police reports had been discovered documenting an interview with a woman named Isabel Ramos shortly after the fire during which she said she may have started the fatal blaze. Ramos admitted setting a fire at 4504 South Marshfield Avenue—less than three blocks from the Hermitage Avenue fire—after 12 hours of drinking in local taverns because she was angry at her landlord and a neighbor. She said she also might have started the Hermitage Avenue fire, but that she was too drunk to remember. Ramos was convicted of arson for the fire on Marshfield Avenue. The report of her statement was never disclosed to Kluppelberg’s lawyer before his trial."


STORY: "City agrees to pay $9.3 million for wrongful conviction tied to Burge detectives," by reporter Jason Meisner,  published by The Chicago Tribune on January 11, 2018.


The entire story can be found at:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-wrongful-conviction-jon-burge-20180110-story.html

See entry in U.S. Registry of Exonerations by Maurice Possley at the link below: "In the early morning hours of March 24, 1984, a fire erupted in the vacant first floor of a three story apartment building on Chicago’s South Side. The fire ripped through the building, killing 28-year-old Elva Lupercio and her five children, Santos, 10; Sonia, 8; Christobel, 6; Yadira, 4: and Anabel, 3, who lived on the second floor. Elva’s husband, Santos, managed to escape, but suffered a fractured skull and severe burns. The fire destroyed the building, located at 4448 South Hermitage Avenue, as well as an adjacent building and damaged another, but no one else was injured. The cause of the fire was listed as undetermined due to extensive burning and the collapse of the building. The fire was closed as “apparent accidental.” More than three years later, in November 1987, Duane Glassco was arrested for burglary, theft and violation of probation. During questioning, Glassco said that he saw James Kluppelberg going back and forth to the building where the fire broke out. Glassco said he made the observation from an attic window of a nearby house where he and Kluppelberg were partying on the night of the fire. He said that Kluppelberg had admitted that he set the blaze. In December, 1987, detectives in the Chicago Police Bomb and Arson Unit were assigned to investigate two car fires which occurred at 820 West Belle Plaine Avenue on Chicago’s North Side, 15 miles from the Hermitage fire.  The fires on Belle Plaine were reported by Kluppelberg, 22, who worked there as a security guard. Police brought Kluppelberg in ostensibly to talk to him about the car fires, but instead began questioning him about the Hermitage Avenue fire.Police said that during the interview, Kluppelberg admitted setting fire to the cars and also to starting several other fires, including the fatal fire on Hermitage Avenue. On January 27, 1988, Kluppelberg was indicted on charges of arson and six counts of murder. In November 1988, Kluppelberg’s alleged confession was ordered suppressed by a judge after Kluppelberg claimed he had been beaten and presented evidence that when he was admitted to the Cook County Jail after his interrogation, he had several bruises in his kidney area and was urinating blood. The judge concluded Kluppelberg had been beaten by police and that his statement had been coerced. The prosecution sought the death penalty at trial in Cook County Circuit before a judge without a jury in January 1990. Glassco testified that although he was high on drugs on the night of the fire, he saw Kluppelberg going to and from the Hermitage Avenue building just prior to the fire. Francis Burns, a Chicago Fire Department captain, testified that he went to the fire as part of a training exercise, not in an official capacity. At the time, suspicious fires were investigated by the Chicago Police Bomb and Arson Unit. Although at the time the fire was officially termed accidental, Burns testified that he believed the fire was arson. He conceded that he took no notes, made no reports and never told anyone of his belief.He testified from memory that he saw burn patterns that indicated the fire was arson. On July 14, 1989, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Loretta Hall Morgan found Kluppelberg guilty. On October 7, 1989, while he was awaiting sentencing, Kluppelberg walked out of the Cook County jail after his bond records were altered to lower his bond from no bond to $25,000. His mother posted $2,500 in cash and Kluppelberg was released. Jail officials discovered that a jail employee had been bribed with $3,000 worth of cocaine to alter the record. Kluppelberg was arrested days later in Macon, Georgia.On March 22, 1990, Judge Morgan rejected the death penalty and sentenced Kluppelberg to life in prison without parole.On December 23, 1993, Kluppelberg’s conviction was upheld by the Illinois Court of Appeals. He was denied leave to appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court. On October 6, 1994, Kluppelberg filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging that his trial lawyer had provided an inadequate legal defense for failing to elicit testimony that the fire was initially deemed an accident and for going against Kluppelberg’s wish to have a jury trial. The petition was dismissed by a state court judge, but in 2002 the Illinois Appeals Court reinstated the petition after finding that Kluppelberg’s post-conviction attorney had provided inadequate legal assistance in preparing the post-conviction petition.Although remanded, the petition was ultimately dismissed on January 14, 2004. In May 2009, another post-conviction petition was filed on Kluppelberg’s behalf by attorneys at The Exoneration Project at the University of Chicago Law School. Kluppelberg’s defense was later joined by lawyers at the private firm of Winston & Strawn, working pro bono. The petition alleged an avalanche of new evidence pointing toward Kluppelberg’s innocence. Glassco had recanted, saying not only that he did not see Kluppelberg coming and going from the building, but that it was impossible to see the Hermitage Avenue building from his attic apartment because another building stood in the way. Aerial photos confirmed the impossibility. Glassco also said that Kluppelberg had never admitted setting the fire and that he agreed to implicate Kluppelberg to escape prison time on the charges he was facing at the time. He also said he was angry at Kluppelberg at the time because Kluppelberg had begun dating Glassco’s former girlfriend. The evolution of arson science had shown that the burn patterns cited as evidence of arson by Burns did not reliably indicate that a fire was deliberately set. These "indicators" are now considered to have no valid scientific basis. Moreover, police reports had been discovered documenting an interview with a woman named Isabel Ramos shortly after the fire during which she said she may have started the fatal blaze. Ramos admitted setting a fire at 4504 South Marshfield Avenue—less than three blocks from the Hermitage Avenue fire—after 12 hours of drinking in local taverns because she was angry at her landlord and a neighbor. She said she also might have started the Hermitage Avenue fire, but that she was too drunk to remember. Ramos was convicted of arson for the fire on Marshfield Avenue. The report of her statement was never disclosed to Kluppelberg’s lawyer before his trial. Lawyers for Kluppelberg and prosecutors in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office contested the petition for the next three years, until, on May 30, 2012, the prosecution announced that it no longer believed it could carry its burden of proof of guilt. Cook County Circuit Court Judge Rickey Jones vacated the convictions and the charges were dismissed.Kluppelberg, after nearly 25 years in prison, was released on May 31, 2012. In May 2013, Kluppelberg filed a federal wrongful conviction lawsuit against the City of Chicago and the Chicago police department.  In August 2013, Judge Michael McHale issued Kluppelberg a certificate of innocence and he was awarded $213,600 in state compensation."

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.






Trauma-informed "junk-science."...Bill S-2266... The 'College Fix' attacks a U.S. Senate draft bill "that would create a “demonstration program on trauma-informed training for law enforcement," - (and the criticisms are right on point. HL)..."This bill alarmed the Center for Prosecutor Integrity, the sister organization to the campus-focused Stop Abusive and Violent Environments. It launched an effort in 2016 to fight “victim-centered” investigations that presume guilt, protect accusers from scrutiny and functionally target black men – “the new war on drugs.” On Thursday the center wrote to Klobuchar, the lead sponsor, asking her to rescind the bill because its goals “will only be achieved at the expense of investigative neutrality, due process, and fundamental fairness”: Proponents of trauma-informed approaches correctly advise investigators to not interpret inconsistencies or gaps in a complainant’s statements as necessarily probative of an unfounded report. But these advocates take the argument one step further, insisting that such inconsistencies should be interpreted as prima facie evidence that sexual trauma in fact did occur. This guilt-presuming stance has the effect of dissuading the investigator from consideration of other explanations for implausible complainant statements, such as excessive ingestion of alcohol or a mistaken allegation."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Center for Prosecutor Integrity letter to Sen. Amy Klobuchar about “trauma-informed” rape bill by The College Fix on Scribd. The letter quotes U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, who ruled against Brandeis University in a due-process lawsuit by an accused student. Saylor wrote: Whether someone is a “victim” is a conclusion to be reached at the end of a fair process, not an assumption to be made at the beginning. Each case must be decided on its own merits, according to its own facts. If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision. The center is not likely to endear itself to Klobuchar, saying her bill is guilty of “careless use of language” that “tells investigators to presuppose victimhood from the time an allegation is first made”: S. 2266 is a legislative Trojan horse that would stain sexual assault investigations with a presumption of guilt. It points her not only to Yoffe’s Atlantic essay on the “junk science” her bill promotes, but to the center’s new white paper that says the “believe the victim” movement “not only threatens the reliability of sexual assault adjudications, it compromises the integrity of our entire criminal justice system.”

STORY: "Republican senator sponsors bill to fund ‘junk science’ in rape investigations," by Associate Editor  Greg Piper, published by College Fix on January 11, 2018...(Greg Piper spent several years as a technology policy reporter and editor for Warren Communications News in Washington, D.C., and guest host on C-SPAN’s “The Communicators. The Student Free Press Association is a nonprofit organization run by veteran journalists to help beginning journalists. With our higher-education news website, The College Fix, we work with college-aged writers, bloggers, tweeters, podcasters, and viral video makers for the purpose of identifying and supporting young people who seek to improve campus journalism, explore careers in the media, and commit themselves to the principles of a free society. We tell stories, spot talent and nurture careers.)"

SUB-HEADING:  "Why would a former judge promote a biased investigation process?"

GIST: "Emily Yoffe’s recent Atlantic series on rape investigations, on and off campus, shone a light on the alarming expansion of “trauma-informed” techniques, enthusiastically endorsed by the Obama administration and its Department of Education. Memory and neuroscience experts told Yoffe there was little evidence backing these pseudoscientific claims – that sexual assault creates “neurobiological change,” induces “tonic immobility” in the victim during the act, represses memories that can be accurately recalled much later (just not immediately after), and that contradictory or changing narratives are actually evidence of assault. Even with the Obama administration gone and its Title IX guidance rescinded, the promotion of trauma-informed “junk science” (as Yoffe calls it) is still chugging along, thanks to bipartisanship. Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Republican Sen. John Cornyn, the Senate majority whip, introduced a bill (S-2266) the Thursday before Christmas, when few people were paying attention, that would create a “demonstration program on trauma-informed training for law enforcement.” The attorney general would award grants to entities to implement “evidence based or promising policies and practices to incorporate trauma-informed techniques” that result in more prosecutions and convictions, specifically naming college campuses as one target community. Yes, the bill is clear that it’s not interested in the evidence underlying trauma-informed investigations. Its goal is to fund research into practices that “prevent re-traumatization of the victim,” as well as improve communication between victims and law enforcement and collaboration among people who deal with violence against women. The bill never refers to “victims” as “alleged,” even though it’s purportedly about investigating alleged crimes. Without a crime, there is no victim. Its metrics for success are “successful investigation and prosecution of the alleged crime [the only “alleged” in the bill] in a manner that protects the victim to the greatest extent possible,” and prioritizing “the well-being of victims and their satisfaction with the criminal justice process.” It’s not surprising that Klobuchar, a former prosecutor, would endorse this guilt-first, intentionally biased approach to sexual-assault investigations, but it’s more surprising that Cornyn would. Though he served as Texas attorney general before joining the Senate, even earlier Cornyn was a trial judge and state supreme court justice, meaning he’s had to evaluate questionable claims made in the name of science. ‘A legislative Trojan horse’ that enshrines ‘presumption of guilt;'  This bill alarmed the Center for Prosecutor Integrity, the sister organization to the campus-focused Stop Abusive and Violent Environments. It launched an effort in 2016 to fight “victim-centered” investigations that presume guilt, protect accusers from scrutiny and functionally target black men – “the new war on drugs.” On Thursday the center wrote to Klobuchar, the lead sponsor, asking her to rescind the bill because its goals “will only be achieved at the expense of investigative neutrality, due process, and fundamental fairness”: Proponents of trauma-informed approaches correctly advise investigators to not interpret inconsistencies or gaps in a complainant’s statements as necessarily probative of an unfounded report.  But these advocates take the argument one step further, insisting that such inconsistencies should be interpreted as prima facie evidence that sexual trauma in fact did occur. This guilt-presuming stance has the effect of dissuading the investigator from consideration of other explanations for implausible complainant statements, such as excessive ingestion of alcohol or a mistaken allegation. "Center for Prosecutor Integrity letter to Sen. Amy Klobuchar about “trauma-informed” rape bill by The College Fix on Scribd. The letter quotes U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, who ruled against Brandeis University in a due-process lawsuit by an accused student. Saylor wrote: Whether someone is a “victim” is a conclusion to be reached at the end of a fair process, not an assumption to be made at the beginning. Each case must be decided on its own merits, according to its own facts. If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision. The center is not likely to endear itself to Klobuchar, saying her bill is guilty of “careless use of language” that “tells investigators to presuppose victimhood from the time an allegation is first made”: S. 2266 is a legislative Trojan horse that would stain sexual assault investigations with a presumption of guilt. It points her not only to Yoffe’s Atlantic essay on the “junk science” her bill promotes, but to the center’s new white paper that says the “believe the victim” movement “not only threatens the reliability of sexual assault adjudications, it compromises the integrity of our entire criminal justice system.” A spokesperson for the center told The College Fix that it’s assuming “every lawmaker with a scintilla of fairness will be opposed to a bill that undermines the presumption of innocence,” so it won’t name its presumed allies who can be counted on to oppose the bill. Perhaps when Cornyn is reminded that he promised not to show partiality as a judge, he’ll become one of those allies."

The entire story can be found at:
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/40848

Read earlier post of this Blog at the link below: "Sunday, December 10, 2017: Forensic Experiential Trauma Interview: (FETI); Part 2: A matter of growing concern. Report obtained by this Blog indicates 'FETI' has been rejected by the U.S. Air Force..."Given the lack of empirical evidence on FETI’s effectiveness, and the large number of investigative, professional and scientific concerns regarding FETI and FETI training, the Air Force does not consider FETI as a viable option for investigative interviewing. We believe it would be inappropriate and irresponsible to discontinue the use of a robust, well-studied, effective, and empirically-validated interviewing method that is supported by the latest scientific research (the Cognitive Interview), in favor of an interviewing method that is loosely constructed, is based on flawed science, makes unfounded claims about its effectiveness, and has never once been tested, studied, researched or validated (FETI)."
 http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2017/12/forensic-experiential-trauma-interview_10.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.

Anthony Shore; Larry Swearingen: Texas; The Austin Chronicle reports lingering questions for Questions Linger for Anthony Shore and Larry Swearingen; Shore is set to be the first Texan executed in 2018.Swearingen, who, unlike Shoremaintains his innocence - has had his November execution stayed due to a filing error, and has since been granted additional DNA testing..."Shore’s execution is just the beginning of a busy month. Swearingen, however, had his November execution stayed due to a filing error, and has since been granted additional DNA testing. Unlike Shore, who confessed to killing four girls between 1986 and 1995, Swearingen has maintained his innocence. His supporters, including his lawyer James Rytting, say he was in a county jail for outstanding traffic warrants at the time of Trotter's murder. The 19-year-old was last seen on Dec. 8, 1998, with Swearingen (who wasn't arrested until three days later), but her body wasn't discovered until Jan. 2. Rytting said forensic evidence suggests her body could not have been dumped in the woods until "a week or 10 days" after Swearingen was arrested. Included in the evidence sent out for testing is Trotter's rape kit, which was never tested and could exonerate Swearingen should analysts uncover another DNA profile. Samples of hair particles found on Trot­ter's undergarments and the alleged murder weapon (a torn pair of pantyhose) will also be tested. The evidence was shipped out in December and testing will likely take four weeks. Rytting was alarmed that the state had reissued an execution date for Shore. "They shouldn't be putting the guy into the ground with these questions still around," he said. He says two witnesses, with no connection to Swearingen, told the D.A.'s Office that Shore suggested to them that he was connected to Trotter's murder. The information, Rytting said, would "sure as hell" make Shore a suspect had it been provided prior to Swearingen's conviction"


STORY: "Questions Linger for Anthony Shore, Larry Swearingen Shore to be first Texan executed in 2018," by reporter Sarah Marloff, published by The Austin Chronicle on January 12, 2018.


https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2018-01-12/questions-linger-for-anthony-shore-larry-swearingen/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.

Rodney Reed: Texas; Judge recommends against new trial..."Defense lawyers used the controversy over Fennell’s 20-year-old statements to introduce testimony by Dr. Michael Baden, a renowned forensic pathologist who concluded that Stites had been killed before midnight, disputing conclusions that she had been strangled shortly after 3 a.m. Baden said evidence showed that Stites had been dead for several hours before she was driven to Bastrop in the passenger seat of a pickup that was found several miles from where her body had been left by the side of a rural road. There was a mucus-like substance found on the passenger side floorboard — discharge from the nose and mouth that is related to decomposition and takes three to four hours to develop, Baden said. In addition, crime scene photos and videotape revealed blood had pooled in the front of Stites’ body — “fixed lividity” that shows Stites had lain face down for at least five hours before her body was left on a rural roadside in an upright position, he said. Benjet argued that the forensic evidence and Davis’ conversation with Fennell introduced enough uncertainty to order a new trial for Reed. But in his findings, Shaver said defense lawyers failed to show that Baden’s testimony could have swayed jurors at Reed’s trial."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Shaver’s findings will be sent to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which will have the final say on whether Reed, 50, gets a new trial. Defense lawyer Bryce Benjet said late Monday that he remained hopeful that the appeals court would reject Shaver’s findings, which are advisory, after examining the new evidence. “We have now proven everything the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals asked us to show, and we look forward to presenting this substantial case to the court,” he said. “Over the past 20 years, the evidence of. Mr. Reed’s innocence continues to mount, and we are confident that he will ultimately be vindicated.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Judge: Bastrop’s Rodney Reed, on death row, should not get new trial," by reporter Chuck Lindell, published by The American Statesman on January 9, 2018.

GIST: "In a major setback for death row inmate Rodney Reed, a judge has recommended that the Bastrop man’s request for a new trial be denied by the state’s highest criminal court. Defense lawyers had argued that newly discovered evidence bolstered their theory that Stacey Stites was murdered in 1996 by her fiance, Jimmy Fennell, not Reed. They pointed to a 2016 TV interview given by Curtis Davis, who was good friends with Fennell and Stites, in which Davis recalled Fennell saying 20 years ago that he had gone out drinking and returned to the Giddings apartment he shared with Stites between 10 and 11 p.m. the night before she died. Fennell had told investigators that he returned to the apartment around 8 p.m. and was with Stites until she left for work around 3 a.m. During a four-day hearing in Bastrop in October, defense lawyers argued that Davis’ recollection, when combined with recently developed forensic evidence, refuted the prosecution theory that Reed killed Stites between 3 and 3:30 a.m. on April 23, 1996, as she drove to her job at a Bastrop grocery store. Instead, they argued, the evidence shows that Stites was killed before midnight, making Fennell the only likely suspect. Visiting Judge Doug Shaver, however, was unimpressed by the evidence in findings of fact that were dated Jan. 5 but filed Monday in court. Shaver noted that Davis testified during the October hearing that Fennell never provided a specific time of his return home and that Davis surmised it was after 10 p.m. Davis’ memory also proved to be unreliable several times during his testimony during the October hearing, the judge wrote. In contrast, Shaver said Carol Stites — the mother of Stacey Stites, who lived in the same apartment building as her daughter — credibly testified that Fennel had arrived home “right before dusk,” which would have been around 8 p.m. Shaver’s findings will be sent to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which will have the final say on whether Reed, 50, gets a new trial. Defense lawyer Bryce Benjet said late Monday that he remained hopeful that the appeals court would reject Shaver’s findings, which are advisory, after examining the new evidence. “We have now proven everything the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals asked us to show, and we look forward to presenting this substantial case to the court,” he said. “Over the past 20 years, the evidence of. Mr. Reed’s innocence continues to mount, and we are confident that he will ultimately be vindicated.” Defense lawyers used the controversy over Fennell’s 20-year-old statements to introduce testimony by Dr. Michael Baden, a renowned forensic pathologist who concluded that Stites had been killed before midnight, disputing conclusions that she had been strangled shortly after 3 a.m. Baden said evidence showed that Stites had been dead for several hours before she was driven to Bastrop in the passenger seat of a pickup that was found several miles from where her body had been left by the side of a rural road. There was a mucus-like substance found on the passenger side floorboard — discharge from the nose and mouth that is related to decomposition and takes three to four hours to develop, Baden said. In addition, crime scene photos and videotape revealed blood had pooled in the front of Stites’ body — “fixed lividity” that shows Stites had lain face down for at least five hours before her body was left on a rural roadside in an upright position, he said. Benjet argued that the forensic evidence and Davis’ conversation with Fennell introduced enough uncertainty to order a new trial for Reed. But in his findings, Shaver said defense lawyers failed to show that Baden’s testimony could have swayed jurors at Reed’s trial. “Baden’s opinions … would not have affected the outcome of trial because they simply present an alternative explanation that the jury could have rejected, the evidence of (Reed’s) guilt was strong, and (defense lawyers) presented no credible evidence of a consensual relationship between he and Stites, which would have been needed to explain why his semen and saliva were found on a dead woman,” Shaver wrote.
Fennell, who is serving a 10-year prison term for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a woman in his custody as a Georgetown police officer in 2007, declined to testify during the October hearing, but his lawyer said Fennell continues to maintain his innocence in Stites’ murder."

The entire story can be found at:

http://www.statesman.com/news/rodney-reed-should-not-get-new-trial-judge-says/cZjCll5agQBImsiFTj5RHM/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.