GOOD NEWS FROM WEST AUSTRALIA; ANDREW MALLARD TO RECEIVE RECORD COMPENSATION PAYMENT; CASE INVOLVED FAILURE TO DISCLOSE FORENSIC EVIDENCE;

The West Australian recently reported that, "Andrew Mallard, who spent more than 11 years in jail after being wrongly convicted of murder, looks set to receive a multi-million dollar compensation payment from the State Government early next year."

By way of background, this blog ran a post on the Mallard case as follows:

"Monday, October 6, 2008:
ANDREW MALLARD: FAILURE TO DISCLOSE FORENSIC EVIDENCE AT ISSUE IN AUSTRALIAN MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE; REPORT ABOUT TO BE ISSUED;

"IN OCTOBER 2004, MALLARD'S LEGAL TEAM WERE GRANTED SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA AND ON SEPTEMBER 6 AND 7, 2005, MALLARD'S APPEAL WAS HEARD IN THE HIGH COURT AND THE JUSTICES SUBSEQUENTLY JUDGED UNANIMOUSLY THAT HIS CONVICTION BE QUASHED AND A RE-TRIAL BE ORDERED. DURING THE HEARING, JUSTICE MICHAEL KIRBY WAS REPORTED TO HAVE SAID THAT ON ONE OF THE PIECES OF EVIDENCE ALONE - A FORENSIC REPORT, NOT DISCLOSED TO THE DEFENCE, SHOWING THAT MALLARD'S THEORY ABOUT THE WEAPON USED IN THE MURDER COULD NOT HAVE BEEN TRUE - A RE-TRIAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN ORDERED;"

WIKIPEDIA: ANDREW MALLARD:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The West Australian Andrew Mallard case bears some similarities to miscarriages of justice caused by Dr. Charles Smith.

For one, prosecutors withheld a crucial forensic report from the defence.

This Blog will be reporting on a report on the Mallard case by the "commission on Crime and Corruption" which is expected to be released later this week.

For now, here is the Wikipedia account of the Andrew Mallard travesty.

(I am very grateful to Professor Robert Moles for drawing the Mallard case to our attention);

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Mallard is a Western Australian who was wrongfully convicted of murder in 1995and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was released from prison in 2006 after his conviction was quashed by the High Court of Australia.

Mallard had been convicted of the murder of Pamela Lawrence, a business proprietor, who was killed at her shop, on May 23, 1994. The evidence used in Mallard's trial was scanty and obscure, and it was later revealed that police withheld vital information from his defence team. Almost twelve years later, after an appeal to the High Court, his conviction was quashed, and a re-trial ordered. However, the charges against him were dropped and Mallard was released. At the time, the Director of Public Prosecutions stated that Andrew Mallard remained the prime suspect and that if further evidence became available he could still be prosecuted.

In 2006 police conducted a review of the investigation and subsequently a cold case review. As a result they uncovered sufficiently compelling evidence to charge convicted murderer Simon Rochford with the murder of Pamela Lawrence and to eliminate Andrew Mallard as a person of interest. Prior to this being announced publicly, and after he had been interviewed by police, Simon Rochford was found dead in his cell in Albany Prison, having committed suicide.

The Western Australian Commission on Crime and Corruption is currently investigating whether there was misconduct by any public officer (police, prosecutors or Members of Parliament) associated with this case.


Evidence at the Trial:

Mallard was convicted chiefly on two pieces of evidence. The first was a set of police notes of interviews with Mallard during which, the police claimed, he had confessed. These notes had not been signed by Mallard. The second was a video-recording of the last twenty minutes of Mallard's eleven hours of interviews. The video shows Mallard speculating as to how the murderer might have killed Pamela Lawrence; police claimed that, although it was given in third-person, it was a confession.

Mallard had no history of violence; no murder weapon had been found. No blood was found on Mallard, despite the violence of the murder and the crime scene being covered with it. Nor was DNA evidence produced. He was convicted on the confessions purportedly given during unrecorded interviews and the partial video-recording of an interview. Despite this, Mallard's appeal to the Supreme Court of Western Australia, in 1996, was dismissed.


Investigation:

In 1998, Mallard's family enlisted the help of investigative journalist Colleen Egan, who in turn managed to get John Quigley MLA and Malcolm McCusker QC involved. All were appalled at the manner in which Mallard's trial had been conducted and eventually came to be convinced that he was innocent. Based on fresh evidence uncovered by this team, including a raft of police reports that, against standard practice, had never been passed to the defence team, the case was returned to the Court of Criminal Appeal in June 2003. Despite the fresh evidence and an uncontested claim that the DPP had deliberately concealed evidence from the defence, the Court of Criminal Appeal again dismissed the appeal.


Leave to appeal:

In October 2004, Mallard's legal team were granted special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia and on September 6 and 7, 2005, Mallard's appeal was heard in the High Court and the Justices subsequently judged unanimously that his conviction be quashed and a re-trial be ordered. During the hearing, Justice Michael Kirby was reported to have said that on one of the pieces of evidence alone - a forensic report, not disclosed to the defence, showing that Mallard's theory about the weapon used in the murder could not have been true - a re-trial should have been ordered.

The DPP did not immediately drop charges against Mallard but did so six months later immediately before a directions hearing was due. After almost twelve years in prison, Mallard was released on February 20, 2006. However in announcing that the trial would not proceed the DPP stated:

"Finally, I note for the record and for the future that this decision is made on evidence presently available to the prosecution. The discharge of Mr Andrew Mallard on this charge does not alter the fact that he remains the prime suspect for this murder. Should any credible evidence present in the future which again gives the state reasonable prospects of obtaining a conviction again, the state would again prosecute him."

Documentary:

A documentary titled Saving Andrew Mallard was directed by Michael Muntz and produced by Artemis International, focussing on Mallard's family, their struggle to have him freed, the deception undertaken by the original police investigation team and the evidence uncovered that eventually led to Mallard's freedom. It was first aired on Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) Television on May 4, 2006. It was shortlisted for a Walkley Award and Michael Muntz won the Outstanding Achievement in Directing Award in the WA Screen Awards.

The documentary's epilogue noted that the DPP still considered Mallard a prime suspect in their investigation at that time.

Review of Investigation and Cold Case Review:

Following the discontinuance of the prosecution by the DPP, the Commissioner of Police instituted a review of the investigation to establish whether there were sufficient grounds for a "cold case" review. The review quickly located a record of a palm print which matched that of Simon Rochford, who had confessed to murdering his girlfriend, Brigitta Dickens, on 15 July 1994, seven weeks after Mrs Lawrence was killed[1]. The print had been found on the top of a display case in Lawrence's shop, which was significant, as it had been the practice of the shop staff to wipe the top of that case after each customer left.

On this basis the review became a cold case review. The weapon used by Rochford to kill Dickens was a steel collar of the type used by weight lifters to secure weights to a bar. Rochford had attached the collar to a broom handle and used it to club Dickens to death. The actual collar could not be located in 2006 but its dimensions were known and a photograph was available. The shape and dimensions of the collar were consistent with the form of the wounds in Lawrence's skull.

The photograph of the collar indicated that it was painted blue and a rucksack belonging to Rochford was found to contain blue paint flakes which were identical in chemical composition to those removed from Mrs Lawrence's wounds.

Rochford's appearance, in particular his beard, was more consistent with the original accounts of eyewitnesses than was Mallard's.

On May 12, 2006, five police officers were stood down by the West Australian Police Commissioner in relation to the original investigation into the murder.

At about 7:45 am AWST on May 19, 2006, the body of Simon Rochford was discovered in his cell at Albany Maximum Security Prison by prison officers just hours after he had been named as "a person of significant interest" in the Pamela Lawrence investigation.

On 11 October 2006 the Police Commissioner announced that the cold case review was complete, that Andrew Mallard was no longer a person of interest in relation to the case; that there was sufficient evidence to implicate Simon Rochford and that, if he had still been living the police would have prepared a Brief of Evidence against him for the WA Director of Public Prosecutions.

The Police Commissioner apologised to Mallard for any part the police had played in his conviction. The Premier indicated that the government would be considering compensation, though the Attorney General stated that no decision could be made until the Commission on Crime and Corruption had completed its investigation. However, on 22 November 2006, the Adelaide advertiser carried an AAP story stating that Andrew Mallard had received A$200,000 as partial compensation.


Commission on Crime and Corruption Hearings:

The Commission on Crime and Corruption announced that it was studying the report of the cold case review and would be holding public hearings in 2007. In the meantime it had asked the police to not release the full report, either to the public or within the police and, in particular, to ensure that police involved in the original investigation had no access to it. The CCC hearings into whether police and/or prosecutors behaved unethically or illegally in the Andrew Mallard case began on 31 July, 2007.

For more on the Mallard case:... http://netk.net.au/Mallard/Mallard76.asp...

The story in the West Australian, by Jayne Rickard, (Perth) began with a report that, "Today Attorney-General Christian Porter confirmed he had received a recommendation on a compensation figure from the State Solicitor, but would not reveal what that was."

"But he did confirm it would safely be in the “multi-millions”, which would make it the highest-ever compensation ex-gratia payment from the WA State Government after Peter and Ray Mickelberg were handed a $1 million payment over their wrongful conviction and jailing for the infamous Perth Mint gold swindle in 1982," the story, published on December 22, 2008, continued;

"Mr Mallard was wrongfully convicted of the 1994 murder of Mosman Park jeweller Pamela Lawrence.

Mr Porter said he would spend the summer break going over the recommendation, which he described as “a full lever-arch folder of advice” before taking his own advice to Cabinet in early January.

“That will be very high on our agenda for Cabinet when we return from this break,” Mr Porter said.

“I’m going to consider the advice he’s given to me. It is, of course, several million. I’m not going to go into it in great detail (now).”

Two police assistant commissioners and one of WA’s most senior prosecutors were hit with a total of eight misconduct findings by the Corruption and Crime Commission in November following its three-year inquiry into the wrongful murder conviction of Mr Mallard."

Hrold Levy...hlevy15@gmail.com;