Monday, February 14, 2011

ANTHONY GRAVES; COMPENSATION DENIED BECAUSE COURT DID NOT DECLARE HIM ACTUALLY INNOCENT. 18 YEARS ON DEATH ROW; HOUSTON CHRONICLE;



"The letter from the comptroller’s office said the court order must indicate "on its face" that it was granted "on the claimant’s actual innocence." Comptroller’s office spokesman R.J. Silva said the law did not allow for special consideration of the facts in Graves’ case.

Kelly Siegler, the special prosecutor who recommended dropping the charges against Graves, said that the words "actual innocence" are not commonly used in the courtroom. She said the compensation law likely was designed for cases involving innocence proven through DNA, not a case thrown out by prosecutors after a reexamination of the evidence.

"Who would have envisioned this kind of situation happening?" Siegler said."

REPORTER HARVEY RICE; HOUSTON CHRONICLE;

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: Wikipedia informs us that: "Anthony Graves was convicted of the 1992 mass murder of six people. His conviction was overturned in 2006 and he waited for years for a retrial. On Oct. 27, 2010, he was released after the Washington-Burleson County District Attorney concluded, "He’s an innocent man. There is nothing that connects Anthony Graves to this crime."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"GALVESTON — The Texas Comptroller’s Office has denied compensation to Anthony Graves, who spent 18 years on death row before a special prosecutor determined he was innocent and authorities dropped capital murder charges against him," the Houston Chronicle story by reporter Harvet Rice published on February 14, 2011 begins, under the heading, "State rejects compensation for wrongly convicted man."

"The state determined that Graves, 45, who could have received as much as $1.4 million had he been deemed eligible, should receive nothing because the words "actual innocence" didn’t appear in the document ordering his release, according to a letter the office sent to Graves’ attorney, Nicole Casarez,"
the story continues.

"Graves said he will continue to press for compensation.

"Nothing has ever been easy for me on this road to justice," Graves said. "I haven’t given up on it and I hope justice will prevail and I’ll be compensated."

Casarez said she was informed of the refusal Friday after phoning the comptroller’s office to find out why she hadn’t received a response even though the 45-day limit to act on Graves’ request had lapsed.

A letter e-mailed to Casarez from the comptroller’s office said the order dismissing the charges must say explicitly that Graves is innocent. Casarez said the office should have taken her client’s unique circumstances into consideration.

"I had spoken to so many people who seemed to think it was possible, I did get my hopes up and I am very disappointed," Casarez said.

The letter from the comptroller’s office said the court order must indicate "on its face" that it was granted "on the claimant’s actual innocence." Comptroller’s office spokesman R.J. Silva said the law did not allow for special consideration of the facts in Graves’ case.

Kelly Siegler, the special prosecutor who recommended dropping the charges against Graves, said that the words "actual innocence" are not commonly used in the courtroom. She said the compensation law likely was designed for cases involving innocence proven through DNA, not a case thrown out by prosecutors after a reexamination of the evidence.

"Who would have envisioned this kind of situation happening?" Siegler said.

"I’m willing to testify to the fact that we believe he’s innocent," she said. "I’ve signed an affidavit. I’m not sure what we are supposed to do to make it happen."

In December, lawyers in the case discussed asking state District Judge Reva Towslee-Corbett, who signed the order freeing Graves, to change the wording of the order. This never happened, however, for reasons that could not be determined Monday.

Casarez said a civil suit seeking compensation was one of several options that would be discussed with attorneys who specialize in that particular type of law. Graves can’t seek a pardon from Gov. Rick Perry, Casarez said, because he has nothing to be pardoned for and asking for a pardon would be tantamount to admitting guilt.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2006 overturned Graves’ 1994 capital murder conviction. He was convicted of killing Bobbie Joyce Davis, 45, in her Somerville home, along with Davis’ 16-year-old daughter, Nicole, and four grandchildren, ages 4-9. Codefendant Robert Carter, executed for the slayings in 2000, went to the execution chamber saying that he had lied when he testified against Graves.

The appeals court found that the prosecution withheld information from the defense and elicited false testimony.

A new trial was ordered and Siegler, a former Harris County assistant district attorney,, took over the case in 2010. She found the original investigation riddled with errors and recommended to Burleson-Washington County District Attorney Bill Parham that the charges be dropped.

Parham agreed and both said at an October news conference that Graves was innocent.

Casarez said other attorneys had assured her that the comptroller’s office could approve the compensation because of the public statement’s prosecutors had made about his innocence.

"Even though the order didn’t contain those magical words ... I was certain the Comptroller’s Office would take a very full look at it," she said."


The story can be found at:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7426785.html?utm_source=feedburner

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be accessed at:

http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith

For a breakdown of some of the cases, issues and controversies this Blog is currently following, please turn to:

http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=120008354894645705&postID=8369513443994476774

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog; hlevy15@gmail.com;