STORY: "A matter of injustice" by Robert Bonner, published by Reuters on November 29, 2012.
GIST: "Three murder cases in the news recently would seem to have little in
common. Michael Morton is a Texas pharmacist convicted in 1986 of
murdering his wife. Jeffrey MacDonald is the Princeton- and
Yale-educated Green Beret medical doctor in prison for the 1972 murder
of his wife and two small children. The “West Memphis Three” are the
teenagers convicted of the 1993 killing of three boys in Arkansas.........Something is amiss when you compare the media’s fixation on these
cases with that of Edward Lee Elmore, a South Carolina man who served 25
years for a crime he did not commit. There have been no editorials, no
“60 Minutes” reports and, most disturbingly, no investigations. Yet the
evidence of prosecutorial misconduct makes what happened to Elmore look
far more egregious.........Under the landmark Supreme Court decision, Brady v. Maryland, the
prosecution is required to turn over all potentially exonerating
evidence to the defense. But withholding evidence is benign compared to what happened with Elmore, who was convicted through acts of
commission.
The prosecution didn’t just withhold exculpatory material ‑ there is
proof that police and investigators manufactured and planted critical
evidence. They claimed, for example, to have found Elmore’s pubic hair on the
victim’s bed. Yet the investigators didn’t take any pictures of the bed,
nor did they take the sheets as evidence, because “there were no
obvious blood or other stains present,” as an investigator later
testified at a hearing. The wall and carpet in the victim’s bedroom were soaked in blood, as
was the robe she was wearing. Yet only three pinprick-size blood spots
were found on Elmore’s jeans, which the police took from his bedroom.
Like the “hairs on the bed,” there is strong evidence that this blood
was planted. One investigator removed the jeans from the evidence locker and had
them for two weeks, without any legitimate reason. He wasn’t assigned to
the case at the time ‑ but had grown up across the street from the
victim and was convinced Elmore was guilty. Writing on the Elmore case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals used
the words “outright dishonest” and “deceit” to describe the work of the
police and investigators. Those are uncharacteristically harsh rebukes. When federal judges use
language like that, the Justice Department might be expected to launch
an investigation or the United States attorney in South Carolina to
convene a grand jury. Maybe they haven’t, in part, because there has been no public outcry.
Where are the editorial writers and columnists or even the celebrities
who spoke up for the West Memphis Three and Morton?"
The entire story can be found at:
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2012/11/28/a-matter-of-injustice/
PUBLISHER'S NOTE
I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses
several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of
the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this
powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and
myself get more out of the site.
The
Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty
incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the
harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into
pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology
system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent
stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html
Please
send any comments or information on other cases and issues of
interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.