Thursday, October 27, 2016

Victor Rosario: Massachusetts: False confession/arson 'science' case: Boston Globe story by reporter Milton J. Valencia is an excellent backgrounder to hearing set for November 8, at which the Supreme Judicial Court will hear arguments on whether Ryan has to retry Rosario in the 1982 fire that tore through a dilapidated three-decker in Lowell, killing eight people, including five young children..."Lisa Kavanaugh, one of Rosario’s lawyers, the head of the Innocence Program for the state’s public defender agency, said that Rosario should be exonerated by prosecutors. His conviction was thrown out in large part because advances in forensic technology cast doubt on whether the fire was deliberately set, raising questions about the accuracy of the confession."..."Within 48 hours of the deadly fire, the worst in Lowell history, investigators zeroed in on Rosario, 24 at the time, as their suspect. Fire inspectors reported that burn patterns in the home indicated the fire was intentionally set. Rosario, then a drug addict and alcoholic, first told investigators he had gone to the apartment next door to buy drugs, and then smelled smoke and heard screams. But after five hours of questioning, Rosario signed a statement that he and two friends had thrown Molotov cocktails into the building as revenge for a botched drug deal. Within a year he was convicted and sentenced to multiple life terms. An investigation by the New England Center for Investigative Reporting, published in the Globe in 2010, found grave shortcomings in the police inquiry, however, including in witness identification techniques. The most significant development was in advances in forensic science, which found that the burn patterns police took as definitive evidence of arson are now considered a common occurrence of any house fire, whether intentionally set or not. The appeal filed on Rosario’s behalf also raised the question of whether he was suffering from a delirium caused by severe alcohol withdrawal and submitted to a coerced confession, a finding made by a mental health analysts who testified for the defense. In her decision vacating the conviction, Superior Court Judge Kathe M. Tuttman ruled that the questionable evidence of arson, coupled with evidence of Rosario’s psychosis during alcohol withdrawal, raised doubts as to the veracity of his confession."


STORY: "Freedom remains tenuous for freed prisoner," by Milton J. Valencia, published by The Boston Globe on October 24, 2016.

PHOTO CAPTION: "Since his release in 2014, ordained minister Victor Rosario has preached widely. 

PHOTO CAPTION:  "Victor Rosario was led into court in Lowell in 1982 after the three-decker fire that killed eight people."

GIST: "It has been two years since a judge freed Victor Rosario from prison, and he says it has been a new life. After serving 32 years behind bars for a deadly arson fire he says he did not set, the 59-year-old ordained minister has performed weddings and baptisms, and founded a church group to help former prisoners adjust back to society. He has also become a long-distance runner, and is set to run the New York City Marathon Nov. 6. But two days after the race, Rosario will be back in court. Middlesex County District Attorney Marian T. Ryan appealed the 2014 decision that granted Rosario a new trial, challenging the judge’s assertion that he may have been under a psychotic episode at the time he confessed to the crimes. On Nov. 8, the Supreme Judicial Court will hear arguments on whether Ryan has to retry Rosario in the 1982 fire that tore through a dilapidated three-decker in Lowell, killing eight people, including five young children.In a recent interview, Rosario said he is learning to enjoy his freedom, and tries to not think about being sent back to prison. “At this point, I’m adjusting to the situation, adjusting to the environment, and I am here enjoying every second of it,” Rosario said.........Lisa Kavanaugh, one of Rosario’s lawyers, the head of the Innocence Program for the state’s public defender agency, said that Rosario should be exonerated by prosecutors. His conviction was thrown out in large part because advances in forensic technology cast doubt on whether the fire was deliberately set, raising questions about the accuracy of the confession. Kavanaugh said she welcomes the high court’s review of the case, saying the court’s decision could settle Rosario’s case and others like it that have been built on questionable evidence. “We felt the issues were important and are glad it’s before the highest court, but our wish is that Victor would be done with this and can move on with his life,” she said. Within 48 hours of the deadly fire, the worst in Lowell history, investigators zeroed in on Rosario, 24 at the time, as their suspect. Fire inspectors reported that burn patterns in the home indicated the fire was intentionally set. Rosario, then a drug addict and alcoholic, first told investigators he had gone to the apartment next door to buy drugs, and then smelled smoke and heard screams. But after five hours of questioning, Rosario signed a statement that he and two friends had thrown Molotov cocktails into the building as revenge for a botched drug deal. Within a year he was convicted and sentenced to multiple life terms. An investigation by the New England Center for Investigative Reporting, published in the Globe in 2010, found grave shortcomings in the police inquiry, however, including in witness identification techniques. The most significant development was in advances in forensic science, which found that the burn patterns police took as definitive evidence of arson are now considered a common occurrence of any house fire, whether intentionally set or not. The appeal filed on Rosario’s behalf also raised the question of whether he was suffering from a delirium caused by severe alcohol withdrawal and submitted to a coerced confession, a finding made by a mental health analysts who testified for the defense. In her decision vacating the conviction, Superior Court Judge Kathe M. Tuttman ruled that the questionable evidence of arson, coupled with evidence of Rosario’s psychosis during alcohol withdrawal, raised doubts as to the veracity of his confession. Ryan’s appeal argues that Tuttman overstepped her authority because no new evidence was presented by the defense. In the original trial, Rosario had already argued unsuccessfully that he was having a psychotic episode at the time of the confession, and prosecutors said the new diagnosis that he suffered from delirium tremens should not alter the initial decision. Prosecutors also argued that the reputed advances in scientific evidence cited by the defense were not sufficient to overturn the verdict, saying Rosario’s confession confirmed that the fire had been arson. Materials used to make the same type of Molotov cocktails Rosario said he threw at the house were found in the basement of his apartment building after the fire. Rosario is the only person convicted in the case; he refused to testify against the two accomplices he named during his confession, and they have since died."

The entire story can be found at:
.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/10/23/freedom-remains-tenuous-for-freed-prisoner/cwlpsDOBv7Iue1CwRaAGzJ/story.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:  http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  
Harold Levy. Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.