Mark Carver: North Carolina; Defense in disputed murder case wants Gaston District Attorney punished for withholding evidence."..."Chris Mumma says in a motion filed Tuesday that Bell, the Gaston County district attorney who helped convict Carver for the 2008 murder of UNC Charlotte student Irina Yarmolenko, continues to ignore a court order that he share his complete files with the defense. Superior Court Judge David Lee of Union County issued the ruling during an April 20 court hearing in which Mumma accused Bell of withholding key evidence. Lee signed his order on May 11, giving both sides 20 days to comply. Mumma, executive director of North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence, says that deadline has come and gone."..." Mumma is seeking a new trial, arguing that Carver received an inadequate defense and that key pieces of evidence used to convict him would not stand up to updated testing and new information uncovered in the case. In particular, Mumma claims that far more conclusive testing and reporting of DNA will undermine the prosecution’s contention that Carver’s genetic material was found on Yarmolenko’s car. She also says Carver’s statements to police indicating that he knew the victim’s height can be challenged by interrogation video – never seen by a jury – that shows he was coached into giving the description by a detective. Last year, the Observer published “Death by the River,” a six-part series raising questions about Carver’s guilt." by reporter Michael Gordon, published by The Charlotte Observer on June 14, 2017.
STORY: "Defense in disputed murder case wants Gaston DA published for withholding evidence," by reporter Michael Gordon, published by The Charlotte Observer on June 14, 2017.
GIST: "The defense team in the
disputed murder conviction of Mark Carver have asked a judge to hold
prosecutor Locke Bell in contempt of court for failing to turn over
promised evidence. Chris Mumma says in a motion
filed Tuesday that Bell, the Gaston County district attorney who helped
convict Carver for the 2008 murder of UNC Charlotte student Irina
Yarmolenko, continues to ignore a court order that he share his complete
files with the defense. Superior Court Judge David Lee of Union County issued the ruling during an April 20 court hearing in which Mumma accused Bell of withholding key evidence. Lee signed his order on May 11, giving both sides 20 days to comply. Mumma, executive director of
North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence, says that deadline has come
and gone. Six months after she says Bell was required by law to share
all evidence, Mumma says she has received none. Neither Bell nor Mumma could be immediately reached for comment Wednesday morning. In an earlier interview, the outspoken Gaston County prosecutor says he remains convinced of Carver’s guilt. In an April interview with
the Observer, Mumma described Bell as “uncooperative and unwilling to
consider that an injustice could have occurred.” Carver, 48, is serving a
life sentence without parole after his 2011 conviction for strangling
Yarmolenko. Her body was found near her car in Mount Holly, on the banks
of the Catawba River. Carver and his cousin were fishing downstream at
the time. The cousin died the day
before his murder trial was to start. Carver was convicted by a Gaston
County jury in 2011 and sentenced to life without parole.
Mark Carver of Gaston County is serving a life
sentence for the 2008 murder of UNC Charlotte student Irina Yarmolenko.
Carver, 48, says he’s innocent and his lawyers want a new trial.
Tuesday, the defense team asked a judge to hold Gaston District Attorney
Locke Bell in contempt for ignoring a court order to share evidence
from the case. Mumma is seeking a new
trial, arguing that Carver received an inadequate defense and that key
pieces of evidence used to convict him would not stand up to updated
testing and new information uncovered in the case. In particular, Mumma
claims that far more conclusive testing and reporting of DNA will
undermine the prosecution’s contention that Carver’s genetic material
was found on Yarmolenko’s car. She also says Carver’s
statements to police indicating that he knew the victim’s height can be
challenged by interrogation video – never seen by a jury – that shows he
was coached into giving the description by a detective. Last year, the Observer published “Death by the River,” a six-part series raising questions about Carver’s guilt. Mumma and Bell have been
wrangling for months over evidence. North Carolina is known as an
“open-file discovery” state in which the law requires attorneys to turn
over their complete files to the opposing side. In response to one of
Mumma’s earlier requests, Bell asked Mumma in writing to cite the
portion of state law that compelled him “to do your research for you.”
The entire story can be found at:
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/crime/article156083859.html#storylink=cpy
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the
Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my
previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put
considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith
and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic
pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses
on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please
send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest
to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy;
Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;
Two Blogs Now: The Charles Smith Blog; The Selfless Warriors Blog: I created the Charles Smith Blog in 2007 after I retired from The Toronto Star to permit me to keep digging into the story of the flawed pathologist and the harm he had done to so many innocent parents and caregivers, and to Ontario’s criminal justice system. Since then it has taken new directions, including examinations of other flawed pathologists, flawed pathology, and flawed science and technology which has marred the quality of justice in courtrooms around the world. The heart of the Blog is my approach to following cases which raise issues in all of these areas - especially those involving the death penalty. I have dedicated 'The Selfless Warrior Blog’ (soon to appear) to those exceptional individuals who have been ripped out of their ordinary lives by their inability to stand by in the face of a glaring miscarriage of justice. They are my ’Selfless Warriors.’ Enjoy!