PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
I have taken on the them of criminalizing reproduction - a natural theme for a Blog concerned with flawed science in its myriad forms and its flawed devotees (like Charles Smith), as I am utterly opposed to the current movement in the United States and some other countries - thankfully not Canada any more - towards imprisoning women and their physicians on the basis of sham science (or any other basis). Control over their reproductive lives is far too important to women in America or anywhere else so they can participate equally in the economic and social life of their nations without fear for loss their freedom at the hands of political opportunists and fanatics. I will continue to follow relevant cases such as Purvi Patel and Bei Bei Shuai - and the mounting wave of legislative attacks aimed at chipping away at Roe V. Wade and ultimately dismantling it.
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.
-----------------------------------------------------------
PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "After all, what is happening in the United States, a country that should be a leader on women’s rights, is shocking. On Wednesday, the Alabama legislature passed the most draconian law to date banning abortions at any stage, without exception for incest or rape. Further, it calls for doctors who perform them to be jailed for up to 99 years. When Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed the bill, she said it “stands as a powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious, that every life is a sacred gift from God.” That’s quite a statement from the governor of the U.S. state that has the highest per capita death penalty rate in the country. What it really stands as a testament to, as California Senator and presidential candidate Kamala Harris tweeted, is Alabama’s goal “to criminalize women for their health care decisions.”
-------------------------------------------------------------
EDITORIAL: "Women’s rights under threat," published by The Toronto Star on May 20, 2109.
GIST: When Judge Brett Kavanaugh was under consideration for a position on the U.S. Supreme Court last fall, one thing became clear: Republican
senators wanted to appoint him to appease the party’s right-wing base,
whose members were confident he would tilt the court’s majority to
overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that established a woman’s constitutional protection to terminate a pregnancy. Now,
in an effort to get Roe v. Wade overturned, they are working with
Republican-controlled state governments to introduce anti-abortion bills
designed to get before the Supreme Court. So why should Canadians
worry Because if
history has made one thing clear, it’s that women’s rights are fragile
and constantly under threat of being extinguished for political
purposes. When they are undermined in any country — or any court — that emboldens those who would try to curb them elsewhere. Canadian
women, one in three of whom will get an abortion in her lifetime, can’t
rest assured that their rights are safe because abortion is legal here. It
was legal in Poland until that country’s government fulfilled a
backroom deal with the Catholic Church and banned abortion in 1993. That
law, which allows for exceptions for serious threats to the health of
the mother or the fetus and for pregnancy resulting from rape or incest,
is now under attack — not from those who want to make abortion legal
again, but from those who want to remove any grounds for it. While abortion is still legal in the United States, it is already increasingly difficult to obtain in many states. So
Canadians would be wise to look south of the border to ensure there is
no “backsliding” here, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau put it. After all, what is happening in the United States, a country that should be a leader on women’s rights, is shocking. On
Wednesday, the Alabama legislature passed the most draconian law to
date banning abortions at any stage, without exception for incest or
rape. Further, it calls for doctors who perform them to be jailed for up
to 99 years. When
Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed the bill, she said it “stands as a
powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is
precious, that every life is a sacred gift from God.” That’s quite a statement from the governor of the U.S. state that has the highest per capita death penalty rate in the country. What
it really stands as a testament to, as California Senator and
presidential candidate Kamala Harris tweeted, is Alabama’s goal “to
criminalize women for their health care decisions.” While there are efforts to control women’s bodies in Canada, they are more subtle. The
fact is, though abortion has been legal in this country since 1988,
access to it is still uneven. That is especially true for lower income
women. For example, the $450 abortion pill Mifegymiso — which was
finally approved for use in Canada in 2015 — is still not universally
covered under all provincial and territorial health care plans. It’s not
even available at pharmacies in many parts of the country. Some provinces have also erected requirements that make it hard for women to obtain timely surgical abortions. And
last week 12 Conservative MPs and three Ontario Progressive
Conservative MPPs attended anti-abortion rallies on Parliament Hill and
at Queen’s Park. “We pledge to fight to make abortion unthinkable in our
lifetime,” MPP Sam Oosterhoff promised. At
the same time, Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer has said unequivocally
that if his party wins October’s federal election, he won’t re-open the
abortion debate in Canada. Still, no one should be complacent about women’s rights on this front — or any other."
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/c