skip to main | skip to sidebar

the charles smith blog

Monday, May 20, 2019

Technology Series: (Part Seven): Software privacy and porn: Software used by police in pornography prosecutions comes under attack by defence lawyers leading to withdrawal of charges; ProPublica story by reporter Jack Gillum explains why technology and privacy may not always mix.don't mix in court. "Defense attorneys have long complained that the government’s secrecy claims may hamstring suspects seeking to prove that the software wrongly identified them. But the growing success of their counterattack is also raising concerns that, by questioning the software used by investigators, some who trade in child pornography can avoid punishment."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: In recent years, I have found myself publishing more and more posts on the  application of artificial intelligence technology to policing, public safety, and the criminal justice process,  not just in North America, but in countries all over the world, including China. Although I accept that properly applied science  can play a positive role in our society, I have learned over the years that technologies introduced for the so-called public good, can eventually be used against the people they were supposed to  benefit. As reporter Sieeka Khan  writes in Science Times:  "In 2017, researchers sent a letter to the secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security. The researchers expressed their concerns about a proposal to use the AI to determine whether someone who is seeking refuge in the US would become a positive and contributing member of society or if they are likely to become a threat or a terrorist. The other government uses of AI are also being questioned, such as the attempts at setting bail amounts and sentences on criminals, predictive policing and hiring government workers. All of these attempts have been shown to be prone to technical issues and a limit on the data can cause bias on their decisions as they will base it on gender, race or cultural background. Other AI technologies like automated surveillance, facial recognition and mass data collection are raising concerns about privacy, security, accuracy and fairness in a democratic society. As the executive order of Trump demonstrates, there is a massive interest in harnessing AI for its full, positive potential. But the dangers of misuse, bias and abuse, whether it is intentional or not, have the chance to work against the principles of international democracies. As the use of artificial intelligence grows, the potential for misuse, bias and abuse grows as well. The purpose of this 'technology' series, is to highlight the dangers of artificial intelligence -  and to help readers make their own assessments as to  whether these innovations will do more harm than good."

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

----------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY:  “The sharing of child-sex-abuse images is a serious crime, and law enforcement should be investigating it. But the government needs to understand how the tools work, if they could violate the law and if they are accurate,” said Sarah St.Vincent, a Human Rights Watch researcher who examined the practice. “These defendants are not very popular, but a dangerous precedent is a dangerous precedent that affects everyone. And if the government drops cases or some charges to avoid scrutiny of the software, that could prevent victims from getting justice consistently,” she said. “The government is effectively asserting sweeping surveillance powers but is then hiding from the courts what the software did and how it worked.”

------------------------------------------------------------

 PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The government’s reluctance to share technology with defense attorneys isn’t limited to child pornography cases. Prosecutors have let defendants monitored with cellphone trackers known as Stingrays go free rather than fully reveal the technology. The secrecy surrounding cell tracking was once so pervasive in Baltimore that Maryland’s highest court rebuked the practice as “detrimental.” As was first reported by Reuters in 2013, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration relied in investigations on information gathered through domestic wiretaps, a phone-records database and National Security Agency intercepts, while training agents to hide those sources from the public record. Courts and police are increasingly using software to make decisions in the criminal justice system about bail, sentencing, and probability-matching for DNA and other forensic tests,” said Jennifer Granick, a surveillance and cybersecurity lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project who has studied the issue. “If the defense isn’t able to examine these techniques, then we have to just take the government’s word for it — on these complicated, sensitive and non-black-and-white decisions. And that’s just too dangerous.”

------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Prosecutors Dropping Child Porn Charges After Software Tools Are Questioned," by reporter Jack Gillum, published by Pro Publica on April 3, 2019. ( Jack Gillum is a senior reporter at ProPublica covering technology, specializing in how algorithms, big data and social media platforms affect people’s daily lives and civil rights.)

SUB-HEADING: "More than a dozen cases were dismissed after defense attorneys asked to examine, or raised doubts about, computer programs that track illegal images to internet addresses."

GIST: (This is a  just portion of a lengthy story. The rest is well worth reading at  the link below. HL) "Using specialized software, investigators traced explicit child pornography to Todd Hartman’s internet address. A dozen police officers raided his Los Angeles-area apartment, seized his computer and arrested him for files including a video of a man ejaculating on a 7-year-old girl. But after his lawyer contended that the software tool inappropriately accessed Hartman’s private files, and asked to examine how it worked, prosecutors dismissed the case. Near Phoenix, police with a similar detection program tracked underage porn photos, including a 4-year-old with her legs spread, to Tom Tolworthy’s home computer. He was indicted in state court on 10 counts of committing a “dangerous crime against children,” each of which carried a decade in prison if convicted. Yet when investigators checked Tolworthy’s hard drive, the images weren’t there. Even though investigators said different offensive files surfaced on another computer that he owned, the case was tossed. At a time when at least half a million laptops, tablets, phones and other devices are viewing or sharing child pornography on the internet every month, software that tracks images to specific internet connections has become a vital tool for prosecutors. Increasingly, though, it’s backfiring. Drawing upon thousands of pages of court filings as well as interviews with lawyers and experts, ProPublica found more than a dozen cases since 2011 that were dismissed either because of challenges to the software’s findings, or the refusal by the government or the maker to share the computer programs with defense attorneys, or both. Tami Loehrs, a forensics expert who often testifies in child pornography cases, said she is aware of more than 60 cases in which the defense strategy has focused on the software. Defense attorneys have long complained that the government’s secrecy claims may hamstring suspects seeking to prove that the software wrongly identified them. But the growing success of their counterattack is also raising concerns that, by questioning the software used by investigators, some who trade in child pornography can avoid punishment.

“When protecting the defendant’s right to a fair trial requires the government to disclose its confidential techniques, prosecutors face a choice: Give up the prosecution or give up the secret. Each option has a cost,” said Orin Kerr, an expert in computer crime law and former Justice Department lawyer. “If prosecutors give up the prosecution, it may very well mean that a guilty person goes free. If prosecutors give up the secret, it may hurt their ability to catch other criminals. Prosecutors have to choose which of those outcomes is less bad in each particular case.” In several cases, like Tolworthy’s, court documents say that the software traced offensive images to an Internet Protocol address. But, for reasons that remain unclear, those images weren’t found on the defendant’s computer. In others, like Hartman’s, defense lawyers said the software discovered porn in areas of the computer it wasn’t supposed to enter, and they suggested the police conducted an overly broad search. These problems are compounded by the insistence of both the government and the software manufacturers on protecting the secrecy of their computer code, so as not to imperil other prosecutions or make trade secrets public. Unwilling to take the risk that the sensitive programs could leak publicly, they have rejected revealing the software even under strict court secrecy. Nevertheless, the software is facing renewed scrutiny: In another case where child pornography identified by the software wasn’t found on the suspect’s computer, a federal judge in February allowed a defense expert to examine it. And recently, the nonprofit Human Rights Watch asked the Justice Department to review, in part, whether one suite of software tools, the Child Protection System, had been independently tested. “The sharing of child-sex-abuse images is a serious crime, and law enforcement should be investigating it. But the government needs to understand how the tools work, if they could violate the law and if they are accurate,” said Sarah St.Vincent, a Human Rights Watch researcher who examined the practice. “These defendants are not very popular, but a dangerous precedent is a dangerous precedent that affects everyone. And if the government drops cases or some charges to avoid scrutiny of the software, that could prevent victims from getting justice consistently,” she said. “The government is effectively asserting sweeping surveillance powers but is then hiding from the courts what the software did and how it worked. The dismissals represent a small fraction of the hundreds of federal and state child pornography prosecutions since 2011. More often, defendants plead guilty in exchange for a reduced sentence. (Of 17 closed cases brought since 2017 by the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles, all but two resulted in plea deals, ProPublica found.) Even after their charges were dropped, Tolworthy and Hartman are both facing new trials. Still, the dismissals are noteworthy because challenges to the software are spreading among the defense bar and gaining credence with judges. Software developers and law enforcement officials say the detection software is an essential part of combating the proliferation of child pornography and exploitation on the internet. “This is a horrendous crime, and as a society we’re obligated to protect victims this young,” said Brian Levine, a computer science professor at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst who helped develop one such tool, called Torrential Downpour. “There are a number of victims who are too young to speak, or can’t speak out of fear. This tool is available to law enforcement to rescue those children who are abused.” In cases where previously flagged porn isn’t turning up on a suspect’s computer, investigators have suggested the files have merely been erased before arrest, or that they’re stored in encrypted areas of a hard drive that the police can’t access. Defense attorneys counter that some software logs don’t show the files were ever downloaded in the first place, or that they may have been downloaded by mistake and immediately purged. Defense lawyers are given a bevy of reasons why porn-detection software can’t be handed over for review, even under a protective order that limits disclosure to attorneys and their experts. Law enforcement authorities often say that they’re prohibited from disclosing software by their contracts with the manufacturer, which considers it proprietary technology. Prosecutors are also reluctant to disclose a coveted law enforcement tool just to convict one defendant. A Justice Department spokeswoman referred ProPublica to a government journal article, which argued peer-to-peer detection tools “are increasingly targeted by defendants through overbroad discovery requests.” “While the Department of Justice supports full compliance with all discovery obligations imposed by law,” wrote lawyers for the Justice Department and the FBI, “those obligations generally do not require disclosure of sensitive information regarding law enforcement techniques which, if exposed, would threaten the viability of future investigations.” One former Justice Department prosecutor said the government has shielded software in criminal cases for fear that disclosure could expose investigators’ capabilities or classified technology to criminals. “They don’t want to reveal that in a case because it can be the last time they use it,” said the lawyer, who requested anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the topic. “It sounds like they may, in some circumstances, be using programs that are never intended to see the light of day in the criminal justice system.” The government’s reluctance to share technology with defense attorneys isn’t limited to child pornography cases. Prosecutors have let defendants monitored with cellphone trackers known as Stingrays go free rather than fully reveal the technology. The secrecy surrounding cell tracking was once so pervasive in Baltimore that Maryland’s highest court rebuked the practice as “detrimental.” As was first reported by Reuters in 2013, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration relied in investigations on information gathered through domestic wiretaps, a phone-records database and National Security Agency intercepts, while training agents to hide those sources from the public record. “Courts and police are increasingly using software to make decisions in the criminal justice system about bail, sentencing, and probability-matching for DNA and other forensic tests,” said Jennifer Granick, a surveillance and cybersecurity lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project who has studied the issue. “If the defense isn’t able to examine these techniques, then we have to just take the government’s word for it — on these complicated, sensitive and non-black-and-white decisions. And that’s just too dangerous.”

The entire story can be read at:


https://www.propublica.org/article/prosecutors-dropping-child-porn-charges-after-software-tools-are-questioned

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.




Posted by Harold Levy at Monday, May 20, 2019
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Post Older Post Home

Blog Nation Badge

Crime Blogs

Followers

The Charles smith blog

Blog Directory - Blogged

Blog Archive

  • ►  2025 (439)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (66)
    • ►  May (89)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (64)
    • ►  February (64)
    • ►  January (65)
  • ►  2024 (743)
    • ►  December (60)
    • ►  November (61)
    • ►  October (73)
    • ►  September (63)
    • ►  August (55)
    • ►  July (62)
    • ►  June (78)
    • ►  May (57)
    • ►  April (62)
    • ►  March (66)
    • ►  February (46)
    • ►  January (60)
  • ►  2023 (732)
    • ►  December (68)
    • ►  November (59)
    • ►  October (58)
    • ►  September (67)
    • ►  August (72)
    • ►  July (62)
    • ►  June (70)
    • ►  May (66)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (58)
    • ►  February (52)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2022 (679)
    • ►  December (73)
    • ►  November (44)
    • ►  October (33)
    • ►  September (38)
    • ►  August (53)
    • ►  July (70)
    • ►  June (51)
    • ►  May (66)
    • ►  April (83)
    • ►  March (60)
    • ►  February (47)
    • ►  January (61)
  • ►  2021 (825)
    • ►  December (77)
    • ►  November (83)
    • ►  October (81)
    • ►  September (77)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (84)
    • ►  June (69)
    • ►  May (71)
    • ►  April (61)
    • ►  March (63)
    • ►  February (43)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2020 (612)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (32)
    • ►  October (36)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (41)
    • ►  July (52)
    • ►  June (55)
    • ►  May (50)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (83)
    • ►  January (70)
  • ▼  2019 (520)
    • ►  December (53)
    • ►  November (56)
    • ►  October (43)
    • ►  September (47)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (46)
    • ▼  May (49)
      • Bulletin: Criminalizing Reproduction: Louisiana go...
      • Bulletin: False Confessions: The Central Park Five...
      • Facial recognition technology: Canada: Significant...
      • Technology Series: (Part fifteen): A visit to Ecu...
      • Technology Series: (Part Fourteen) : Bulletin: Maj...
      • Central Park Five Jogger Case: Mini-series to de...
      • Technology Series Thirteen: Artifical Intelligenc...
      • Charles Ray Finch: North Carolina: Extraordinary ...
      • Technology Series: (Part Twelve): Artificial inte...
      • Criminalizing Reproduction: President's poisonous ...
      • Criminalizing Reproduction: (Attacks on Science, M...
      • Technology Series: (Part Eleven): Extremely impor...
      • Technical Series (Part Ten): Bulletin: "Amazon hea...
      • Technology Series (Part Nine): Global News report...
      • Arson 'Science': Cameron Todd Willingham: Stuart ...
      • Technology series: (Part Eight): Algorithms: Ethic...
      • Criminalizing Reproduction: (Attacks on Science, M...
      • Technology Series: (Part Seven): Software privacy ...
      • Technology Series: (Part Six): Algorithms: (Acco...
      • Technology Series: (Part Five): 'One Month, 500,0...
      • Bulletin: (Criminalizing reproduction): "The Misso...
      • Chris Tapp: Idaho: Major Development: (False conf...
      • Radley Balko: Faulty Crime scene Investigation: Th...
      • Technology Series: (Part Four) Can Predictive Po...
      • Technology Series (Part Three): Major Development:...
      • Technology Series. (Part two): Is 'Gangs Matrix,' ...
      • BULLETIN: Criminalizing Reproduction: (Attacks on ...
      • Criminalizing reproduction: Georgia: ((Attacks on ...
      • Technology Series (Part One): Use of futuristic t...
      • Forensics Reform Series 3: Eminent criminal justic...
      • Andrew Krivak: New York: False Confession Case: M...
      • Forensics Reform Series: Part Two: U.K "Forensic s...
      • Forensics Reform Series: Part One: USA: Bite-mark...
      • Global News: Wrongful Convictions Series. (Part fi...
      • Criminalizing reproduction: Alabama close to passi...
      • Criminalizing reproduction: "Georgia governor sign...
      • Sedley Alley: Tennessee: A case that cried out for...
      • Kathleen Folbigg: Australia: A most enlightening a...
      • Canada’s Wrongfully Convicted: Global News Series...
      • Arkansas: Belynda Goff: Reporter Mike Masterson c...
      • Mark Lundy: New Zealand: Major (Welcome) Developm...
      • Kyle Unger: Manitoba: Flawed hair analysis: Major...
      • Canada’s Wrongfully Convicted: (Part three of five...
      • Henry Keogh: South Australia: Major Development: H...
      • Christopher Abernathy: Illinois: False confession ...
      • Canada’s Wrongfully Convicted: (Part two of five ...
      • Mark Lundy: New Zealand..."Lundy a victim of 'junk...
      • Charle Erickson: Missouri: (False confession serie...
      • Charles Erickson: Missouri: False confession serie...
    • ►  April (40)
    • ►  March (45)
    • ►  February (37)
    • ►  January (40)
  • ►  2018 (561)
    • ►  December (39)
    • ►  November (44)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (55)
    • ►  July (53)
    • ►  June (69)
    • ►  May (60)
    • ►  April (42)
    • ►  March (44)
    • ►  February (54)
    • ►  January (62)
  • ►  2017 (621)
    • ►  December (42)
    • ►  November (39)
    • ►  October (79)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (56)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (63)
    • ►  May (47)
    • ►  April (76)
    • ►  March (65)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (62)
  • ►  2016 (1013)
    • ►  December (82)
    • ►  November (106)
    • ►  October (105)
    • ►  September (99)
    • ►  August (90)
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (42)
    • ►  May (93)
    • ►  April (91)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (72)
    • ►  January (70)
  • ►  2015 (939)
    • ►  December (70)
    • ►  November (76)
    • ►  October (92)
    • ►  September (92)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (90)
    • ►  June (87)
    • ►  May (76)
    • ►  April (114)
    • ►  March (54)
    • ►  February (84)
    • ►  January (47)
  • ►  2014 (597)
    • ►  December (40)
    • ►  October (49)
    • ►  September (47)
    • ►  August (50)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (61)
    • ►  May (70)
    • ►  April (64)
    • ►  March (76)
    • ►  February (73)
    • ►  January (64)
  • ►  2013 (661)
    • ►  December (42)
    • ►  November (61)
    • ►  October (99)
    • ►  September (83)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (33)
    • ►  June (43)
    • ►  May (61)
    • ►  April (52)
    • ►  March (46)
    • ►  February (56)
    • ►  January (70)
  • ►  2012 (619)
    • ►  December (55)
    • ►  November (23)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (58)
    • ►  August (71)
    • ►  July (73)
    • ►  June (69)
    • ►  May (34)
    • ►  April (68)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (48)
    • ►  January (50)
  • ►  2011 (830)
    • ►  December (59)
    • ►  November (58)
    • ►  October (65)
    • ►  September (86)
    • ►  August (54)
    • ►  July (78)
    • ►  June (79)
    • ►  May (68)
    • ►  April (84)
    • ►  March (86)
    • ►  February (47)
    • ►  January (66)
  • ►  2010 (764)
    • ►  December (62)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (105)
    • ►  September (63)
    • ►  August (83)
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (71)
    • ►  May (65)
    • ►  April (57)
    • ►  March (87)
    • ►  February (49)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2009 (465)
    • ►  December (55)
    • ►  November (28)
    • ►  September (53)
    • ►  August (49)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (56)
    • ►  April (34)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (43)
    • ►  January (39)
  • ►  2008 (370)
    • ►  December (47)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (49)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (41)
    • ►  April (54)
    • ►  March (35)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (38)
  • ►  2007 (103)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (48)
    • ►  October (31)
    • ►  September (4)

About Me

My photo
Harold Levy
Two Blogs Now: The Charles Smith Blog; The Selfless Warriors Blog: I created the Charles Smith Blog in 2007 after I retired from The Toronto Star to permit me to keep digging into the story of the flawed pathologist and the harm he had done to so many innocent parents and caregivers, and to Ontario’s criminal justice system. Since then it has taken new directions, including examinations of other flawed pathologists, flawed pathology, and flawed science and technology which has marred the quality of justice in courtrooms around the world. On International Wrongful Conviction Day in 2024, I was thrilled to have the Blog recognized by Innocence Canada, when I was presented with the, "Rubin Hurricane Carter Champion of Justice Award." The heart of the Blog is my approach to following cases which raise issues in all of these areas - especially those involving the death penalty. I have dedicated 'The Selfless Warrior Blog’ (soon to appear) to those exceptional individuals who have been ripped out of their ordinary lives by their inability to stand by in the face of a glaring miscarriage of justice. They are my ’Selfless Warriors.’ Enjoy!
View my complete profile
 

Search This Blog

https://forensicresources.org/

  • CSI DDS | Forensic Science Testimony. CSI bad science issues and their contribution to wrongful convictions.
    Forensics: Making your Constitutional rights more “efficient” in NC. 7 year limit.
    3 hours ago
  • The Marshall Project
    Dozens of Teens Who Spent Time at Abusive Florida Reform School Ended Up on Death Row
    1 day ago
  • On SBS
    Accusers Are Playing Defense
    6 days ago
  • Comments on: In a Louisiana Parish, Hundreds of Cases May Be Tainted By Sheriff’s Office Misconduct
    Lockdowns, Violence, and “Barbaric Conditions” in a Federal Jail Known for its Famous Detainees
    2 weeks ago
  • Wrongful Convictions Report
    Lucky girl, that Brittany
    2 weeks ago
  • Forensic Resources
    Expert assistance in toxicology and pharmacology available starting July 1, 2025 through Expert Services Project
    2 weeks ago
  • Pursue Democracy
    It’s malice not cowardice
    2 weeks ago
  • Gamso - For the Defense
    Until They Are Dead
    3 weeks ago
  • In the news by Karen Franklin PhD
    Adolescence, interrogated
    3 months ago
  • Crime & Justice Research Alliance
    Program That Aims to Reduce Cyclical, Retaliatory Gun Violence Saw Shootings Decline After Prevention Program in Lansing, MI
    3 months ago
  • Grits for Breakfast
    Grits publishes "Tulia" zine for 25th anniversary: Preorder now!
    9 months ago
  • Wrongful Conviction News
    Life after a wrongful conviction: Meet Charles Jackson
    2 years ago
  • MIP
    2022 Annual Report
    2 years ago
  • Stop Wrongful Convictions
    Truth About The Innoculations – Dr. Chetty
    3 years ago
  • Wrongly Convicted Group Website
    Could Conner Have Washed Ashore?
    4 years ago
  • Wrongful Convictions Blog
    Ohio Chief Justice Convenes Wrongful Conviction Task Force
    5 years ago
  • Forensic Science in North Carolina
    Forensic Toxicology Online Symposium
    6 years ago
  • Little Rascals Day Care Case
    Death noted: Former publisher of Edenton paper
    6 years ago
  • Forensic Pathology Forum
    My Father Killed Himself — Advice from a Physician and Suicide Survivor.
    6 years ago
  • Innocence Project of Florida
    Exoneration Anniversary: Wilton Dedge
    6 years ago
  • The Watch
    Afternoon links: Conservatives and criminal-justice reform
    6 years ago
  • Comments for Fault Lines
    Comment on Thank You, and Farewell by Brian Cowles
    7 years ago
  • View-from-Wilmington
    A new book on forensic science and the law
    8 years ago
  • Megrahi: You are my Jury
    Sunday Times letter highlights errors in Kenny MacAskill’s book
    8 years ago
  • Justiceforaarushitalwar.com
    CBI USES ‘TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR’ TO SAVE FACE !!
    9 years ago
  • Innocence Matters: The Innocent should not be in prison
    John Klene's Innocence Matters
    12 years ago
  • Todd Willingham was Executed, but His Story Gets a New Life | The Arson Research Project
    March 25 2013
    12 years ago
  • Welcome to the Justice 4 Simon website
  • The Crime Report – Criminal Justice News, Statistics & Resources
  • The Wrongful Conviction of Jason Payne / Home
  • Susan Neill-Fraser is Innocent | Facebook
  • The Innocence Project - Home
  • Home
  • The Exoneration Initiative
  • Simple Justice
  • Comments on: MAIN
  • Petition | Free Pam Jacobazzi | Change.org
  • Envista Forensic Engineering Services and Forensic Consultants
  • innocent.org.uk
  • The Crime Report – Criminal Justice News, Statistics & Resources
  • The Innocence Project
  • The Marshall Project
  • Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario - Home Page
  • Jeffrey Havard
  • Medill Innocence Project
  • Home
  • AIDWYC: The Association In Defence of the Wrongly Convicted
  • The case of Hank Skinner
  • Free Rodney Lincoln - Free an innocent man from a wrongful conviction in St. Louis, Missouri
  • McElroy Law
  • NZPIP - The Home of the New Zealand Public Interest Project. Working in the interests of justice and the public good.

http://www.personal.psu.edu/dhk3/blogs/DoubleHelixLaw/

  • The Marshall Project
    Dozens of Teens Who Spent Time at Abusive Florida Reform School Ended Up on Death Row
    1 day ago
  • On SBS
    Accusers Are Playing Defense
    6 days ago
  • Comments on: In a Louisiana Parish, Hundreds of Cases May Be Tainted By Sheriff’s Office Misconduct
    Lockdowns, Violence, and “Barbaric Conditions” in a Federal Jail Known for its Famous Detainees
    2 weeks ago
  • Forensic Resources
    Expert assistance in toxicology and pharmacology available starting July 1, 2025 through Expert Services Project
    2 weeks ago
  • Pursue Democracy
    It’s malice not cowardice
    2 weeks ago
  • Innocence Project
    Perry Lott is Exonerated After 35 Years of Wrongful Conviction in Ada, Oklahoma
    1 year ago
  • Wrongly Convicted Group Website
    Could Conner Have Washed Ashore?
    4 years ago
  • BEtter Consulting – Legal Services
  • Free Clayton Allison