Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Kevin Strickland: Missouri: (Part One): Major (Unwelcome) Development. (Part One) The Missouri Supreme Court on Tuesday (June 1, 2021) declined to hear his innocence claim, even though prosecutors say he has spent four decades in prison for a triple murder he did not commit..."The state’s highest court did not provide a reason for denying Strickland’s petition, which was supported by Jackson County prosecutors who have determined he was wrongly convicted in the 1978 killings in Kansas City. Strickland’s petition was filed May 10 — the same day Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker announced that her office, federal prosecutors, Kansas City’s mayor and others were calling for Strickland’s exoneration and release. In their filing, Strickland’s attorneys argued he is not only innocent, but his trials were marred by constitutional violations. That included allegations that prosecutors deliberately excluded Black jurors from serving at Strickland’s second trial."


PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "The case against Strickland, who was 18 when he was arrested, was “thin from its inception” and relied almost entirely on the testimony of a traumatized woman who was shot during the murders, prosecutors now say. They began reviewing Strickland’s conviction in November after speaking with his lawyers and reviewing a Star investigation into his innocence claimFor decades, two men who pleaded guilty in the April 25, 1978, murders at 6934 S. Benton Ave. swore Strickland was not with them and two other accomplices during the shooting. The lone eyewitness also recanted and wanted Strickland released. A third suspect, who was never charged, said in 2019 that he knew there “couldn’t be a more innocent person than” Strickland, according to a Midwest Innocence Project investigator."

----------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Last month, a bill sent by lawmakers to Gov. Mike Parson’s desk would allow Baker to ask a judge to free Strickland. If signed, it would clear the way for innocence claims to be brought before trial courts whenever a prosecutor believes a person is innocent. At the time, Baker celebrated the General Assembly’s action. “My hope is that Mr. Strickland will not need this new fix because his case is before the Supreme Court now,” she said in a statement. “But I will use any pathway available to exonerate and free him.” Parson could also grant Strickland clemency. In May, the governor’s office said it was aware of Strickland’s case but declined to comment further."

-------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: “M.O. Supreme Court declines to hear Kevin Strickland’s case. Prosecutors say he’s innocent,” by Reporter Luke Nozicka, published by The Kansas City Star on June 1, 2021. (Luke Nozicka covers crime and courts for The Kansas City Star.)


PHOTO CAPTION: Jackson County's prosecutors have determined that Kevin Strickland, who’s spent 40+ years in prison for a 1978 triple murder, is innocent. The Midwest Innocence Project has filed a petition to overturn the conviction.


PHOTO CAPTION: “Kevin Strickland is pictured in an interview room at Western Missouri Correctional Center on Nov. 5, 2019. Strickland is serving a life sentence for a 1978 triple murder that he claims he did not commit. He says that when he has his first parole hearing, he probably will not be released because he refuses to accept responsibility for a crime that he did not commit. “It’s a matter of principle now,” he said. “My life is over. They took all my prime years.” He now uses a wheelchair because medical issues keep him from standing for more than a few minutes at a time.”


GIST: “The Missouri Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear the innocence claim of Kevin Strickland, even though prosecutors say he has spent four decades in prison for a triple murder he did not commit.


The state’s highest court did not provide a reason for denying Strickland’s petition, which was supported by Jackson County prosecutors who have determined he was wrongly convicted in the 1978 killings in Kansas City.


Strickland’s petition was filed May 10 — the same day Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker announced that her office, federal prosecutors, Kansas City’s mayor and others were calling for Strickland’s exoneration and release.


In their filing, Strickland’s attorneys argued he is not only innocent, but his trials were marred by constitutional violations. That included allegations that prosecutors deliberately excluded Black jurors from serving at Strickland’s second trial.


Strickland, 61, could be freed through other avenues.


Last month, a bill sent by lawmakers to Gov. Mike Parson’s desk would allow Baker to ask a judge to free Strickland. If signed, it would clear the way for innocence claims to be brought before trial courts whenever a prosecutor believes a person is innocent.


At the time, Baker celebrated the General Assembly’s action.


“My hope is that Mr. Strickland will not need this new fix because his case is before the Supreme Court now,” she said in a statement. “But I will use any pathway available to exonerate and free him.”


Parson could also grant Strickland clemency. In May, the governor’s office said it was aware of Strickland’s case but declined to comment further.


The case against Strickland, who was 18 when he was arrested, was “thin from its inception” and relied almost entirely on the testimony of a traumatized woman who was shot during the murders, prosecutors now say.


They began reviewing Strickland’s conviction in November after speaking with his lawyers and reviewing a Star investigation into his innocence claim.


For decades, two men who pleaded guilty in the April 25, 1978, murders at 6934 S. Benton Ave. swore Strickland was not with them and two other accomplices during the shooting. The lone eyewitness also recanted and wanted Strickland released.


A third suspect, who was never charged, said in 2019 that he knew there “couldn’t be a more innocent person than” Strickland, according to a Midwest Innocence Project investigator."


------------------------------------------------------------------


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


This is a developing story:  The entire  story can be read at: https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article251833728.html