Friday, June 11, 2021

The Marshall Project: Bulletin: Monumental Achievement: Marshall Project awarded Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting, along with AL.com, IndyStar and Invisible Institute, for its year-long, far-reaching investigation into the life-altering injuries caused by police dog bites...Publisher's Note: "I have often praised 'The Marshall Project' for its stellar reporting, relevance, and its influence on criminal justice reform. It is an awesome publication. The honour is so well deserved. Harold Levy. Publisher. The Charles Smith Blog. PS: Read the entire series at the link below. HL.


PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  Bravo:...I have often praised 'The Marshall Project' for its stellar reporting, relevance,  huge influence on criminal justice reform and educational value. It is an awesome publication. The honour is so well deserved. Harold Levy. Publisher. The Charles Smith Blog. PS: Read the entire series at the link below. HL.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

POST:"The Marshall Project wins the Pulitzer Prize," published by The Marshall Project on June 11, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: "'Mauled' is honoured in the National Reporting category."

GIST: "The  Marshall Project, AL.com, IndyStar and Invisible Institute. have been awarded a Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting for their year-long, far-reaching investigation into the life-altering injuries caused by police dog bites.

“We are humbled by this honor, and excited to see nonprofit journalism and criminal justice reporting recognized by the Pulitzer Prize Board,” said Susan Chira, The Marshall Project’s editor in chief. “This investigation shows the power of journalistic collaboration between local and national outlets, and cooperation between reporters, editors and designers to create a series with impact.”


Police dogs bite thousands of people every year in the United States, leading to devastating injuries — and sometimes death. Gruesome bites often receive local attention and lead to lawsuits, but no one was putting the pieces together on a national scale until our series, “Mauled: When Police Dogs Are Weapons.”


We identified and tracked individual cases, based mostly on court records, and eventually built a nationwide database of more than 150 severe incidents. Our investigation found that most bite victims were suspected of low-level, non-violent crimes, and some bites were inflicted on bystanders who happened to be in the wrong place when police deployed a dog. Almost none of the victims were armed.


The investigation has already prompted changes across the country at a time of heightened awareness of police brutality. Days after publication of our first installment, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department announced revisions in its use of police dogs. Our stories prompted a national police think tank to begin work on guidelines for K-9 units throughout the country. The Massachusetts Legislature passed a police-reform bill that included limits on the use of dogs. The head of the Washington State Legislature’s Public Safety Committee used our reporting when crafting a reform bill aimed at preventing the use of police dogs to bite people. And in Baton Rouge, where we partnered with The Advocate, the mayor directed the police chief to stop using dogs on teenage suspects shortly after our story was published in 2021.


Our nationwide tracker allows readers to sort incidents by state, read descriptions of the attacks and view videos of some of them. We also published a guide for local news organizations that want to track dog bite incidents and policies in their communities."


There's more! The entire post can be read at:

the-marshall-project-wins-the-pulitzer-prize

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;