Friday, November 5, 2021

Ernest Ray Willis (better known as Ernie); Texas: Consummate writer Michael Hall explains how 'flimsy forensic [arson)science' wrongfully sent Ernest Willis to prison for seventeen and a half years, (most on death row), how he once came within 48 hours of being executed, how he was exonerated, and how he beat the Texas criminal justice system..."By the time Ernie got to Odessa in 1986 he was forty, an alcoholic with six ex-wives and a bad back caused by a 1970 accident that had led to four surgeries. On June 10, 1986, he was living in a trailer with his cousin Billy Willis, who made and sold bathtub speed, and they found themselves at a party in the small town of Iraan with two women they’d just met. At some point, Ernie took off his eel-skin boots and passed out on the couch, and early the next morning the house caught on fire. Ernie and Billy made it out, but the women didn’t. Though there was no physical evidence against Ernie, he was charged with capital murder. The prosecution’s theory was that he set the fire; “pour patterns” on the floor showed Ernie had used some kind of accelerant. While he sat in jail, he was given high daily doses of the anti-psychotics Haldol and perphenazine, which gave him a doped-up look that, once the trail started, the prosecutors used to full advantage, referring to his “cold fish eyes.” Ernie’s young defense attorney, who had four years’ experience and had never tried a death penalty case, rarely objected. (Neither the DA’s office nor jail officials ever gave an explanation for the drugs.) It took the jury only an hour to sentence Ernie to death."


PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "The trial court kept setting and resetting execution dates for Ernie, which made everything worse. “Living with the knowledge that you didn’t do it when other people think you did, that was the hard part,” he told me later. “But when [in 1991] I was a few days away, the thing that went through my head was ‘I’m innocent. A lot of people believe I am. I’m ready for it.’ I’d built myself up. I knew my chances were slim in Texas. I’d made my mind up—if they were gonna execute me, I was just gonna lay down and go to sleep.” Luckily for Ernie, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted him a stay.  A year later, Ernie finally got some help. First came a small army from a large New York commercial law firm, which took on his appeals pro bono. The firm sent five lawyers, a private eye, and an arson investigator to look into the case. Not only did they find the records of the jailhouse doping, they located a former drug partner of Billy’s who confessed to having set the fire, a psychologist’s report (withheld from the defense) that found Ernie was not a future danger to anyone, and an arson expert who said the forensic evidence used at trial was absolutely bogus."

------------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "A couple of years later I visited him in Midland to talk about the controversial case of Cameron Todd Willingham, who had been executed in 2004 for setting fire to his house and killing his three children. Willingham, whom Ernie had gotten to know on death row, had been convicted on similar evidence, in particular the pour patterns on the floor. Now Willingham’s case was a national scandal, and experts were saying he, like Ernie, was innocent. Ernie was quite aware that the only difference between him and the dead man was that he had a pro bono New York law firm that spent $5 million to free him, while Willingham had a court-appointed appellate lawyer. “If he could have hung on just three or four or five more months,” Ernie told me, “he would have been in the same shape I was. He would have walked out of there a free man.” Ernie was by no means an activist, but he believed what many people came to believe. “Texas executed an innocent man,” he said. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "The State of Texas tried to kill Ernest Willis. But he still had a lot of living to do," by Reporter Michael Hall, published by Texas Monthly on October 20, 2021. (Mike Hall writes about criminals, musicians, the law, and barbecue. Mike graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in 1979 with a degree in government. He wrote for various publications, including Trouser PressThird Coast Magazine, the Austin American-Statesman, and the Austin Chronicle. In 1997 he joined Texas Monthly, where he has won two Texas Gavel Awards from the State Bar of Texas and four Stephen Philbin Awards from the Dallas Bar Association. He was named Writer of the Year at the City and Regional Magazine Awards in 2015. His stories have appeared in The Best American Magazine WritingThe Best American Sports WritingThe Best American Nonrequired ReadingDa Capo Best Music Writing, the New York Times, and Men’s Journal. Mike is also a musician and has played in Austin bands the Wild Seeds, the Setters, the Lollygaggers, and the Savage Trip. He pitches for the Burkas, the Texas Monthly softball team.)

SUB-HEADING: "The wild times of a Texas roughneck who beat the Texas criminal justice system."

GIST: “Ernest Ray Willis, better known as Ernie, had every right to let his anger get the better of him, but he never did. Ernie’s number one beef was with the State of Texas, which tried its best to kill him, even though the worst thing he’d ever done was drink too much and get behind the wheel of a truck.


 That particular misunderstanding began in 1986 in Pecos County, when the district attorney used flimsy forensic science to indict Ernie for capital murder. 


Then, while in jail awaiting trial, Ernie was doped up with anti-psychotic medicine, leaving him looking, during the trial, like a “satanic demon,” in the words of the prosecutor.


 He was convicted and sent to death row, where he forced himself to keep his anger down. “You can’t hate and hate and hate,” he told himself. Somehow, he maintained this attitude even when, in 1991, the state came within 48 hours of executing him.


 He was freed 13 years later, in 2004, after his lawyers finally convinced the courts he was innocent. Ernie was 59 and had had 17 and a half years stolen from him. Still, he kept his cool. “Nothing can bring back those years,” he said in his slow West Texas drawl. 


Ernie could have also complained mightily about his body, which had taken a lot of abuse and neglect while he was on death row and started failing him after he got out. Living in Mississippi with his wife, Verilyn, he lost one leg to diabetes and then another. He was in constant pain from his back. Still he wouldn’t give in. Even after Verilyn died, he was determined to live out the rest of his days as best he could. Finally, on January 7, at age 75, Ernie’s hard, strange life caught up with him, and he died at home—17 years after walking off death row. His death certificate read “natural causes.” You might say that, considering all he was up against, he was lucky to make it as long as he did. But the truth is Ernie made his own luck. He worked hard to live as long as he did. 


I got to know Ernie in 2002 when I was doing a long piece on capital punishment for Texas Monthly. His story was unbelievable. In his younger days, Ernie had been a tall (six foot three), soft-spoken, hardheaded, good-looking roughneck who spent his days as a tool pusher in the oil fields of eastern New Mexico and West Texas—and his nights chasing a good time. When he got in trouble it was because of his drinking; his entire criminal record involved three DWIs, a couple of obscene phone calls, and one naked visit to the drive-through window of a fast-food restaurant. 


By the time Ernie got to Odessa in 1986 he was forty, an alcoholic with six ex-wives and a bad back caused by a 1970 accident that had led to four surgeries. On June 10, 1986, he was living in a trailer with his cousin Billy Willis, who made and sold bathtub speed, and they found themselves at a party in the small town of Iraan with two women they’d just met. At some point, Ernie took off his eel-skin boots and passed out on the couch, and early the next morning the house caught on fire. Ernie and Billy made it out, but the women didn’t. 


Though there was no physical evidence against Ernie, he was charged with capital murder. The prosecution’s theory was that he set the fire; “pour patterns” on the floor showed Ernie had used some kind of accelerant. While he sat in jail, he was given high daily doses of the anti-psychotics Haldol and perphenazine, which gave him a doped-up look that, once the trail started, the prosecutors used to full advantage, referring to his “cold fish eyes.” Ernie’s young defense attorney, who had four years’ experience and had never tried a death penalty case, rarely objected. (Neither the DA’s office nor jail officials ever gave an explanation for the drugs.) It took the jury only an hour to sentence Ernie to death.


Once he got to death row, he reckoned he couldn’t let his anger rule him. “I knew if I didn’t let it go, I couldn’t survive,” he told me later. “I let all that go.” Still, he would look around at the walls of his five-by-nine-foot cell and fall into a funk. He stopped going outside and playing basketball. He ate compulsively and his weight grew to three hundred pounds.


 The trial court kept setting and resetting execution dates for Ernie, which made everything worse. “Living with the knowledge that you didn’t do it when other people think you did, that was the hard part,” he told me later. “But when [in 1991] I was a few days away, the thing that went through my head was ‘I’m innocent. A lot of people believe I am. I’m ready for it.’ I’d built myself up. I knew my chances were slim in Texas. I’d made my mind up—if they were gonna execute me, I was just gonna lay down and go to sleep.” Luckily for Ernie, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted him a stay. 


A year later, Ernie finally got some help.


 First came a small army from a large New York commercial law firm, which took on his appeals pro bono. The firm sent five lawyers, a private eye, and an arson investigator to look into the case. Not only did they find the records of the jailhouse doping, they located a former drug partner of Billy’s who confessed to having set the fire, a psychologist’s report (withheld from the defense) that found Ernie was not a future danger to anyone, and an arson expert who said the forensic evidence used at trial was absolutely bogus.


One of Ernie’s appellate attorneys, Austin-based Rob Owen, would often visit him on death row. Owen had other death row clients too, but he always arranged to see Ernie last. Most of his cases were not auspicious ones, but Ernie’s was different. “I always believed Ernie would get out,” Owen told me. “It was a tonic to talk to him—we’d always talk about hopeful things. He had a wicked sense of humor.” They’d talk about the future and about the San Francisco 49ers, Ernie’s favorite NFL team. Owen was always amazed at Ernie’s outlook. “The consuming sense of injustice must have been gutting. But he had a deeply Zen attitude to everything: bad things happen, and one of them happened to me, but I’m not going to let it define me. His willfulness had a lot to do with him surviving death row. Ernie survived it because he was so obstinate.” 


Then there was Verilyn Harbin, the sister of Ernie’s friend and fellow death row inmate Ricky McGinn, who introduced them via letters. Verilyn, who was from Mississippi, and Ernie hit it off and began writing each other daily, and soon she was visiting, speaking to him from the other side of a Plexiglas window. They fell in love and married (using a proxy) in 2000. The two had never even touched, but, she told me for my story “Death Isn’t Fair,” which was published in December 2002, “He is the most loving person I’ve ever met.”


In 2004, Ernie got his most powerful ally yet. Federal judge Royal Furgeson was repelled by the actions of the State of Texas and wrote about Ernie that “both his conviction and sentence were obtained in violation of the United States Constitution.” Furgeson ordered the district attorney to either retry Ernie or set him free. The DA said he thought the facts exonerated Ernie, and on October 8, he was freed. He walked out of prison and into Verilyn’s arms, where she held him for a full minute. “There’s so much catching up to do,” he told reporters, “but we’re going to catch it up a day at a time, hour by hour, minute by minute.” First he had to get out of Texas. So he climbed into Verilyn’s car and they headed to Grenada, Mississippi.


Some exonerees seek the limelight, some push for change. Others just want to get back to their lives. That was Ernie. I saw him in 2005 at the courthouse in Fort Stockton when he got his arrest record expunged—he wanted to be able to carry a gun again so he could go hunting. He had lost a lot of weight and looked fit and confident. His back was still in pain; he had gotten no help for it behind bars, plus he had diabetes, which he blamed on the bad prison food. He’d driven from Mississippi in a new truck he’d bought with the money the state paid him as compensation for his years behind bars. He’d bought Verilyn a car too, and would buy cars for his two sons as well. He got himself an eighteen-wheeler, with which he started a business; soon he and Verilyn were hauling houses and boats back and forth across the country. “There was no place we wouldn’t go,” he told me, “except New York. I told Verilyn there’s too much traffic.” 


Ernie might have been a budding entrepreneur, but he was also at heart still an oil field roughneck, and it wasn’t long before he was reverting to some of his wild old ways. He and Verilyn often argued heatedly. “They were the exact same,” said her daughter Krystal Greer, “that’s why they clashed. They were each stubborn and bullheaded.” The couple split in 2007 and he moved to Midland, where he lived with his son Shawn; Ernie’s brother Alton lived in nearby Odessa. 


A couple of years later I visited him in Midland to talk about the controversial case of Cameron Todd Willingham, who had been executed in 2004 for setting fire to his house and killing his three children. Willingham, whom Ernie had gotten to know on death row, had been convicted on similar evidence, in particular the pour patterns on the floor. Now Willingham’s case was a national scandal, and experts were saying he, like Ernie, was innocent. Ernie was quite aware that the only difference between him and the dead man was that he had a pro bono New York law firm that spent $5 million to free him, while Willingham had a court-appointed appellate lawyer. “If he could have hung on just three or four or five more months,” Ernie told me, “he would have been in the same shape I was. He would have walked out of there a free man.”

Ernie was by no means an activist, but he believed what many people came to believe. “Texas executed an innocent man,” he said. 


I saw him again in 2012 at a press conference in Austin where members of Willingham’s family spoke about trying to get him posthumously pardoned. Ernie had told me he was going to drive all the way from Mississippi—he’d reunited with Verilyn and moved back there—to give his two cents. I was standing by an elevator when the door opened and a thin old man rolled out in a wheelchair. It was Ernie, who weighed about 135 pounds and looked downright feeble. He pulled himself along the carpet with his left leg; his right was gone below the knee, lost from diabetes. Ernie cried as he spoke about Willingham. Afterward, he told me he wanted to write a book about his life and he wanted my help, but he wasn’t quite ready yet. There was too much to do back in Mississippi, plus he didn’t want to make Verilyn jealous of the life he had lived. He hinted that though he had been officially married seven times, the actual number was much higher. I was intrigued. I could imagine the title: “The wild life of a gentle roughneck who beat the Texas criminal justice system.”


Four years later, Verilyn died of a massive heart attack; Ernie, who was with her at the end, took it hard. By this time his condition had worsened drastically. He was smoking heavily and had lost his second leg (“I’m walking on stilts,” he told me over the phone in September 2016) and was passing blood. He thought he had cancer but, typically hardheaded, he wouldn’t go to the doctor because he didn’t want to undergo chemo. He was still determined to take care of himself, aided by money he still received from the State of Texas. He had his truck set up so he could drive and he’d head over to Tunica and play blackjack or sit around in his recliner, smoking and watching the news. He was still in constant pain and every three months he’d drive to Midland to visit his pain doctor. “I’m gonna do what I can while I can,” he told me. Shawn had moved nearby and he loved hanging out with him. He would also visit Krystal’s teenaged kids and drive them around. “He spoilt the hell out of my kids,” said Krystal. 

Ernie told me he was finally ready to do the book. “I feel like I need to do it soon,” he said. “I’m not getting any younger or healthier.” 


We talked about getting together that Thanksgiving in Austin, on his return trip from Midland to Mississippi. He would drive his motor home to a nearby Walmart, set up, and we’d work together for a couple of days. He wanted some help remembering the details and asked me to send him the stories I’d written on him, and I did.


But when I called him in mid-November to schedule our rendezvous, he didn’t pick up. I tried again several times over the next week and couldn’t get him. I couldn’t get hold of his brother Alton or anyone else and, when I didn’t hear from Ernie over the next few months, I assumed the worst.


 But out of the blue he called in December 2019. He had recently fallen and broken his hip, plus now he had problems with his neck and hands. “I just hurt all the time,” he said. I called several times during the pandemic but could never get Ernie on the phone. 


Finally, late last year, he called me back. He sounded drained. “Well, Michael,” he said in his slow drawl, “it doesn’t look like we’re ever gonna get a chance to write that book, are we?” We both laughed sadly; it was clear Ernie was near the end. Not long after that, he was admitted to a hospital, but there wasn’t much they could do and they sent him home to die with his family. January 6 was Verilyn’s birthday. “He got real bad on her birthday,” said Krystal. The next morning, Ernie opened his eyes. “Verilyn,” he said, “I’m coming to see you, sweetie.” Then he died.


His obituary was brief, mentioning his family and his years as a tool pusher and the owner of a transport company. It said nothing about his time on the toughest death row in the country, his refusal to give in to despair, or his determination to live life as best he could—wherever he was. His friend Rob Owen thought Ernie would have liked it just fine. “His obituary was on target,” Owen said. “He told me at that hearing in 2005, ‘I don’t want to live my life as the guy who got off death row, because then I’m never gonna escape that.’” 


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/texas-tried-kill-ernest-willis-still-had-living-to-do/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS: "Ernest Ray Willis was arrested on October 22, 1986, and charged with capital murder.  At trial, the prosecution called him a “cold-hearted” murderer, a “monster,” an “animal,” and a “satanic demon.”  The defense attorney failed to object to these descriptions, and called no character witnesses – including several who could have testified that Willis had once saved a boy from drowning.  Willis appeared emotionless and extremely dazed throughout the trial, which seemed to reinforce the prosecution’s claim that he was a remorseless killer.  He was convicted on August 4, 1987, and sentenced to death.  The conviction was upheld by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 1989, and in 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari."

---------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS:

In their investigation, the new attorneys found that in the months leading up to the trial, the state began to give Willis high doses of anti-psychotic drugs along with his usual pain medication, without telling him and despite the fact that he displayed no signs of psychosis; it was these drugs that caused his dazed, expressionless appearance at trial.  Investigation also uncovered a psychological evaluation that had never been turned over to the defense, finding no evidence that Willis would pose a future threat to society. This assessment would likely have spared him from the death penalty at the sentencing phase of his trial.  Finally, attorneys discovered that after Willis’s conviction, another death row inmate who had been charged with arson confessed to a psychologist that he had burned down the Robinson’s home because of a grudge he held against Bill Willis. Though there were several holes in this story, this confession cast further doubt on Willis’s guilt.   Based on this new evidence, an appellate court granted Willis’s petition for habeas corpus, but it was then rejected by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2000. Attorneys then filed a federal habeas corpus petition, which was granted in 2004. In response, a new Pecos County District Attorney began to review the case himself.  He hired arson experts, who found that the previous experts had been mistaken: there was in fact no evidence that the house had been set on fire intentionally.  The house had electrical problems, which may have caused the fire; ultimately, these experts concluded that the cause of the fire was “undetermined.”  As a result of this evaluation, the District Attorney moved to dismiss the charges, and on October 5, 2004, Willis was released from prison.  In 2005, Willis was awarded $429,000 in state compensation plus a monthly annuity of $9,965. In January 2021, Willis died at age 75."

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Read the National Registry of Exonerations entry by Alexandra Gross at the link below. Contributing factors are listed as: False or misleading forensic evidence, official misconduct, and  inadequate legal defence. 

GIST: "In the early hours of June 11, 1986, a house fire in Iraan, Texas, killed 24-year-old Elizabeth Belue and 25-year-old Gail Allison.  The house was owned by Cheryl and Michael Robinson, and the night before, Belue and Allison had been up late drinking with the Robinsons and two men who were staying with them at the time, cousins Ernest Ray Willis and Bill Willis.  At some point, the Robinsons had a violent quarrel outside the house and were arrested, but the guests remained and eventually went to sleep.  When the house began to burn, only the Willises made it outside alive.  
 
The sheriff investigating the fire suspected that it had been set intentionally, and arson experts seemed to confirm this suspicion, claiming to find “pour patterns” on the floor – charred marks said to have been left by a flammable liquid that had been poured inside the house.  Ernest Ray Willis, who was the first out of the house and the least injured, became the leading suspect.  There was no physical evidence that he had set the house on fire, and no apparent motive – Willis suffered from chronic back pain that made it difficult to work, and the Robinsons had offered him a place to stay in exchange for fixing their car.  He claimed that the fire woke him at about 4:00 a.m., and that he ran through the house trying to wake the others before the flames forced him outside, where he began to break windows to create escape routes.  Bill Willis said he had awakened at around 3:30 a.m. and smelled something burning, but when he could not find the source, he went back to sleep.  
 
Ernest Ray Willis was arrested on October 22, 1986, and charged with capital murder.  At trial, the prosecution called him a “cold-hearted” murderer, a “monster,” an “animal,” and a “satanic demon.”  The defense attorney failed to object to these descriptions, and called no character witnesses – including several who could have testified that Willis had once saved a boy from drowning.  Willis appeared emotionless and extremely dazed throughout the trial, which seemed to reinforce the prosecution’s claim that he was a remorseless killer.  He was convicted on August 4, 1987, and sentenced to death.  The conviction was upheld by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 1989, and in 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari.
 
In prison, letter writing was a source of comfort for Willis, and he began to correspond with the mother of a mentally ill inmate who would not communicate with his family. Grateful for the updates on her son, the inmate’s mother sent copies of Willis’s letters to the law firm of Latham & Watkins, and in 1992, a team of attorneys agreed to take on his case pro bono.  
 
In their investigation, the new attorneys found that in the months leading up to the trial, the state began to give Willis high doses of anti-psychotic drugs along with his usual pain medication, without telling him and despite the fact that he displayed no signs of psychosis; it was these drugs that caused his dazed, expressionless appearance at trial.  Investigation also uncovered a psychological evaluation that had never been turned over to the defense, finding no evidence that Willis would pose a future threat to society. This assessment would likely have spared him from the death penalty at the sentencing phase of his trial.  Finally, attorneys discovered that after Willis’s conviction, another death row inmate who had been charged with arson confessed to a psychologist that he had burned down the Robinson’s home because of a grudge he held against Bill Willis. Though there were several holes in this story, this confession cast further doubt on Willis’s guilt.  
 
Based on this new evidence, an appellate court granted Willis’s petition for habeas corpus, but it was then rejected by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2000. Attorneys then filed a federal habeas corpus petition, which was granted in 2004.
 
In response, a new Pecos County District Attorney began to review the case himself.  He hired arson experts, who found that the previous experts had been mistaken: there was in fact no evidence that the house had been set on fire intentionally.  The house had electrical problems, which may have caused the fire; ultimately, these experts concluded that the cause of the fire was “undetermined.”  As a result of this evaluation, the District Attorney moved to dismiss the charges, and on October 5, 2004, Willis was released from prison.  In 2005, Willis was awarded $429,000 in state compensation plus a monthly annuity of $9,965.

In January 2021, Willis died at age 75.

 https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=3755

------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: “It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.