Monday, November 15, 2021

Julius Jones: Death Row: Oklahoma: Prof. Lawrence Hellman has written the following letter to 'The Oklahoman' - explaining why Governor Kevin Stitt should follow the unprecedented recommendation of the state Pardon and Board to grant Mr. Jones clemency by commuting his death sentence to the lesser (but still severe) sentence of life with the possibility of parole, because there is sufficient doubt about Jone's guilt that his life should be saved. I fervently hope the governor reads these wise words, finds some humanity and justice deep within his political soul, and heeds them. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.



Sign change.org petition; Julius Jones is innocent - Don't let him be executed by the State of Oklahoma:  Link below: 


https://chng.it/wJH8KDdLmY


--------------------------------------------------------


Lawrence Hellman is Professor Emeritus and Dean Emeritus of Oklahoma City University School of Law, where he established the Oklahoma Innocence Project in 2011. He is no longer associated with that Project, and his views do not represent the views of the Project or Oklahoma City University. He has no involvement with the Julius Jones case.


--------------------------------------------------------

"To The Editor: I do not know whether Julius Jones is guilty or innocent of the crime for which he was sentenced to be executed by the State of Oklahoma.

 Neither do you.

 Yes, he was convicted by a jury, and that conviction was upheld by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

But the same was true for seven other Oklahomans who, since 1981, remarkably were found to be actually innocent before their capital sentences were carried out. 

Each exoneration came many years after the individual had been placed on death row to await execution. One person’s exoneration came within days of his scheduled killing.

The decision before you is not whether to declare Mr. Jones innocent and set him free. This is not his request. 


Nor is it the recommendation of the Pardon and Parole Board. Rather, the Board recommends that you grant Mr. Jones clemency by commuting his death sentence to the lesser (but still severe) sentence of life with the possibility of parole.


The Board’s recommendation is unprecedented in Oklahoma history. It is premised on the Board’s conclusion, after hearing lengthy presentations from representatives of both Mr. Jones and the State, that there is sufficient doubt about Mr. Jones’s guilt that his life should be spared.


 The seven death row exonerations, plus another 31 Oklahoma exonerations in non-capital cases since 1993 (including 17 sentences of life or life without parole), support the prudence of the Board’s recommendation.


 Collectively, these many exonerations demonstrate that our criminal justice system can be fallible. And a wrongful conviction can affect any of us, regardless of race or background.

Ad


The Board’s recommendation does not reflect the Board’s belief that Mr. Jones is innocent or that his conviction should be set aside. Nor does it reflect the Board’s opposition to the use of the death penalty in our state. 


Rather, it reflects the judgment of this non-partisan body that, in this particular case, the risk of factual error in Mr. Jones’s conviction is sufficient to warrant sparing his life – the remainder of which may be spent in prison.


Governor Stitt, you can accept the Board’s unprecedented recommendation in this case without disrupting the jury’s verdict of guilt and without casting doubt on your support for the death penalty. I urge you to do so.

     — Lawrence K. Hellman, Oklahoma City;


The entire letter can be read at

https://www.oklahoman.com/story/opinion/2021/11/14/letter-editor-gov-kevin-stitt-can-support-death-penalty-still-spare-julius-jones/8617242002/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.