--------------------------------------------------------------------
GIST: "The groundbreaking discovery of DNA’s unique double-helix structure is celebrated annually on April 25, World DNA Day.
DNA — or deoxyribonucleic acid — is in every cell of every living organism and contains the “blueprint” for building and maintaining living beings.
And even though humans share 99.9% of their DNA with one another, the 0.1% of DNA that varies from person to person can tell us a lot about each individual, and can be used to help identify people who have committed crimes as well as exonerate wrongly convicted people.
The emergence of DNA technology, which has the ability to provide irrefutable proof of wrongful convictions, inspired Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld to co-found the Innocence Project in 1992.
Since then, the organization has used DNA technology and litigation to help free and exonerate hundreds of innocent people.
Here are five crucial facts about DNA and wrongful conviction you should know:
575 people have been exonerated based on DNA testing in the U.S.
According to the National Registry of Exonerations, 575 wrongly convicted people have been exonerated based on DNA tests that demonstrated their innocence since 1989. That includes 196 Innocence Project clients.
DNA testing in one case can cost up to $50,000.
While genetic DNA tests like 23andMe are fairly affordable, the kinds of DNA tests used in criminal cases can be very costly. Testing in a single case can cost anywhere between $5,000 and $50,000.
This is often because multiple types of DNA tests may need to be conducted on a single piece of evidence, several pieces of evidence may each need to be tested, or very specialized testing may be necessary.
DNA testing has exonerated 35 people from death row.
Nearly three dozen people sentenced to death have been exonerated based on DNA evidence, according to the National Registry of Exonerations.
That includes Kirk Bloodsworth, the first person to spend time on death row and be exonerated by DNA evidence in the U.S. Mr. Bloodsworth spent nearly nine years wrongly incarcerated and is the founder of Witness to Innocence.
Though all 50 states have post-conviction DNA laws, many of these laws are so restrictive or limited in scope that few people can actually access DNA testing after being convicted.
For example, in Alabama, a convicted person can only get DNA testing in their case if they have been charged with a capital offense, while in Kentucky, people who plead guilty are barred from accessing DNA testing, even if they falsely confessed or were coerced.
Restrictive laws like this impede true justice and prevent wrongly convicted people from proving their innocence, while allowing the people who actually committed the crimes to remain undetected.
This is why the Innocence Project works to amend these laws to ensure people can access DNA testing to demonstrate their innocence after they’ve been convicted.
As a result of such work done in partnership with the Innocence Network and exonerees, states like New Hampshire and Colorado have recently changed their laws to make DNA testing more accessible to people seeking justice.
In 2021, New Hampshire changed its threshold for obtain testing, removing a “timeliness” requirement commonly used to deny requests for testing and extending access to testing beyond currently incarcerated people to include people on parole, probation, or sex-offender registries.
And this year, Colorado similarly expanded access to post-conviction testing beyond currently incarcerated individuals. The state also reduced hurdles to justice for people hoping to prove their innocence by changing their threshold for DNA testing to a “reasonable probability” that they would not have been convicted.
Not every case will have meaningful DNA evidence to test.
While DNA does have the power to tell us a lot about people and crime scenes, it is not always available. DNA evidence is most likely to be left behind in violent crimes but only available in a small percentage of even these cases. Attackers leave behind DNA evidence in less than 10% of murders.
This means that in many cases of wrongful conviction (such as a shooting where no physical evidence is left behind), there may not be DNA evidence to test.
Additionally, the ability to perform DNA testing on evidence relies on evidence being preserved (requirements for how long evidence must be preserved varies) and findable in law enforcement facilities.
So preventing wrongful convictions by all means possible in the first case is so important because DNA will not be the key to justice for all innocent people."
https://innocenceproject.org/dna-and-wrongful-conviction-what-to-know-world-dna-day/
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
SEE BREAKDOWN OF SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG, AT THE LINK BELOW: HL:
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985
FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
------------------------------------------------------------------
YET ANOTHER FINAL WORD:
David Hammond, one of Broadwater’s attorneys who sought his exoneration, told the Syracuse Post-Standard, “Sprinkle some junk science onto a faulty identification, and it’s the perfect recipe for a wrongful conviction.”
----------------------------------------------------------
