"Sanford, who was 14 years old at the time, spent eight years
in prison. Kym Worthy declined to bring charges against Tolbert because
there weren't any witnesses who would testify against him, including
Sanford who invoked his Fifth Amendment right. The six-year statute of limitations on the charge was to expire tomorrow. Davontae was 15 when he pleaded guilty to four murders and
was imprisoned in 2008. He's 24 years old now. Sanford walked out of
prison Wednesday, after a judge erased the guilty pleas at the request
of Wayne County prosecutor Kym Worthy. The case appeared closed
and unremarkable until lawyers discovered a hit man's confession to the
same killings -- along with eight other killings -- just 15 days after
Sanford was sent to prison. That touched off years of efforts to get the
guilty pleas set aside, but prosecutors resisted at every turn until
state police were asked last year to take a fresh look. The hit man's
name is Vincent Smothers. Worthy's office in a statement said that on May 20, 2016, at the
conclusion of the re-investigation of the Runyon Street homicides for
post-conviction purposes in Davontae Sanford’s case, the Michigan State
Police submitted a warrant request to the Wayne County Prosecutor’s
Office seeking the authorization of perjury charges against former
Detroit Police Department Deputy Chief James Tolbert. Worthy explained the decision to not charge Tolbert was due to Sanford's decision. "The
obvious question is why this office could move to dismiss a case where
four people were killed based on James Tolbert's interview with Michigan
State Police, but not charge him with perjury? As I have stated, the
building blocks of our case were severely undermined by this interview
and we requested that the case be dismissed. “In order to proceed
with perjury charges, we must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Tolbert's testimony on July 13, 2010, was false. There were only three
witnesses to the drawing of the sketch in question. Two of them,
Davontae Sanford and James Tolbert are unavailable to us. The third
person is Sgt. Michael Russell, and his testimony does not support a
perjury charge. The bottom line is that there is an important legal
distinction between acting on evidence that undermines a conviction, and
proving beyond a reasonable doubt that someone has committed perjury,” Sanford has said that after being released that he wants to move on with his life........."For a while, of course I'd be like, angry, mad," he said
last month. "At the end of the day, the people who played a part in it
... what [are] they doing? They're living their life," he said. "So, me,
being mad, angry, didn't do nothing. It would just hurt me. What's the
use in being mad?"
http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/173292464-story
http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/173292464-story