Tuesday, July 27, 2021

Cristhian Bahena Rivera: Iowa: Bulletin: (We are Iowa - Local 5 News) reports that he will be back in court today arguing for a new trial - as Prosecutors motion to nullify subpoenas related to sex-trafficking which the defence has issued..."Another note in the prosecution's motion says the court ruled such requests like these are a "fishing expedition." The prosecution's motion also says the court has already ruled the information subpoenaed to have "no relevance to or connection with the disappearance and murder of Mollie Tibbetts."




LIVE 'WE ARE IOWA' YOU-TUBE COVERAGE OF MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL:


----------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Prosecution motions to nullify subpoenas in Bahena Rivera case," by Reporter Hollie Schlesselman, published by News 5 (We are Iowa) , on July 27, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: "State moves to nullify sex trafficking subpoenas in Bahena Rivera's appeal. saying they're not related to the case. 


GIST: "Prosecutors in the case against the man convicted of killing Mollie Tibbetts have asked the court to nullify several subpoenas requested by the defense, saying those requests are "overbroad and not related" to the case.


A motion from the state says the subpoenas issued by Cristhian Bahena Rivera's defense team requested information from the Mahaska County Sheriff's Office surrounding alleged sex trafficking, including information about witnesses, victims or suspects from Jan. 1, 2019, to the present. 


This comes after the court already denied Bahena Rivera a motion to consider new evidence in court. Bahena Rivera's defense has also motioned for a new trial after he was convicted in May


The court filing lists one other subpoena sent to an Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation agent who assisted in the Mahaska County investigation as well as their suspicion that the defense may have submitted similar requests to area law enforcement agencies. 


"This subpoena and any similar subpoenas are overbroad and not related to this case," the court document says. "The requests may also include otherwise privileged or sensitive law enforcement information relating to on-going investigations." 


The prosecution also argues there wasn't enough time for the Mahaska County Sheriff's Office to gather all of the information requested. The document says the sheriff's office received the request on July 23 shortly after noon. 


Another note in the prosecution's motion says the court ruled such requests like these are a "fishing expedition."  


The prosecution's motion also says the court has already ruled the information subpoenaed to have "no relevance to or connection with the disappearance and murder of Mollie Tibbetts." 


Bahena Rivera will be back in court Tuesday where his attorneys will argue for a new trial. All of the remaining motions from his defense team are all about tossing out the guilty verdict. 


The defense says they will need a full day to present their evidence and call witnesses, one of those being a man who claims a former cellmate of his confessed to killing Tibbetts."


The entire story can be read at:


https://www.weareiowa.com/article/news/local/mollie-tibbetts/cristhian-bahena-rivera-appeal-subpoena-quash-nullify-sex-trafficking-investigation-death-of-mollie-tibbets/524-7eb88c11-e976-439e-91c5-822a4da76b75

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;