PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "Perry has denied involvement in the deaths since his January 2000 arrest. Perry was convicted in 2003 largely on the testimony of his ex-girlfriend’s mother, who said Perry had told her he planned to kill Harold Swain. The state didn’t disclose to the defense that the woman was paid $12,000 in reward money for her testimony."
-----------------------------------------------------------
PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The state had argued at a Monday hearing that Perry couldn’t seek a new trial because he signed an agreement to forgo appeals as part of an agreement to a life sentence after his conviction, avoiding a possible death penalty. “He waived all appeal rights,” The Brunswick News reported Assistant District Attorney John Johnson as saying. He led the prosecution in Perry’s 2003 conviction."
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: He made a deal - pleading guilty to the two murders to avoid the death penalty - and the prosecutor wants to hold him to the deal, thereby keeping him in prison on two life sentences - even though there is compelling DNA evidence another person may have committed the crime. Truly unbelievable. Over the line, (Even for Georgia);
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: "Andrew Ekonomou, a lawyer for the state, repeatedly objected to testimony not related to DNA evidence because the judge isn’t deciding who killed the Swains. But Scarlett said in his order granting Perry’s motion that the DNA test linking Sparre to the scene would have resulted in a different verdict at Perry’s 2003 trial, which entitles him to a new trial. “Dennis Perry was convicted of double murder eighteen years after the fact without any physical evidence connecting him to the crime scene,” Scarlett wrote. “Newly discovered DNA evidence links another suspect, one whose alibi for the night of the murders may have been fabricated, to the key piece of evidence recovered from the crime scene.” Perry’s legal team and the Georgia Innocence Project issued a joint statement Friday, thanking the judge for going forward with the hearing and granting the motion."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
STORY: "Judge grants new trial in 1985 murder of Georgia couple, by Reporters Zachery Lashway and Corley Peel, published by News4jax on July 19, 2021.(Zachery Lashway is an Emmy-nominated TV reporter and weekend anchor. Corley Peel reports weeknights for The Ten O'Clock News and News4Jax at 11.)
SUB-HEADING: "Dennis Perry serving two life sentences in death of husband, wife killed inside Camden County church."
GIST: "A judge decided Friday to grant a Georgia man’s request for a new trial in the 1985 shooting deaths of a husband and wife.
Dennis Perry is serving two life sentences for the killings of Harold and Thelma Swain, who were slain inside Rising Daughters Baptist Church in Camden County.
The 58-year-old Perry has been in prison for 20 years, but his attorneys asked for a new trial after DNA evidence emerged tying another suspect to the crime scene.
Perry’s family released a statement Friday after Superior Court Judge Stephen Scarlett signed the order to give Perry a new trial:
“We are so happy that a wrong was righted today and that Dennis’s conviction was overturned. We have always believed in Dennis’s innocence and stood by him for the past 20 years. We thank the judge for listening to the evidence, thank the witnesses for their bravery and expertise, and thank the Georgia Innocence Project and King & Spalding for their hard work and dedication and commitment to truth. May the Swains finally have justice.”
The state had argued at a Monday hearing that Perry couldn’t seek a new trial because he signed an agreement to forgo appeals as part of an agreement to a life sentence after his conviction, avoiding a possible death penalty.
“He waived all appeal rights,” The Brunswick News reported Assistant District Attorney John Johnson as saying. He led the prosecution in Perry’s 2003 conviction.
“We rarely see this in the criminal justice system,” said attorney Gene Nichols, not affiliated with the case. “To have a case come back that is this old for DNA evidence to now be discovered that somebody didn’t potentially commit the crime.”
Perry has denied involvement in the deaths since his January 2000 arrest. Perry was convicted in 2003 largely on the testimony of his ex-girlfriend’s mother, who said Perry had told her he planned to kill Harold Swain. The state didn’t disclose to the defense that the woman was paid $12,000 in reward money for her testimony.
Joe Gregory, a GBI agent assigned to the case in 1985, testified that he ruled out Perry after determining it would have been “virtually impossible” for him to be in Camden County at the time of the crime. Perry worked in the metro Atlanta area and didn’t leave his job until after 5:30 p.m. The shootings occurred at 8:40 p.m.“In my opinion, we cleared Mr. Perry and we moved on to other suspects,” he said.
New evidence suggests that 57-year-old Erik Sparre could be involved. Perry’s attorneys conducted a DNA test that now ties Sparre to the scene after reporting by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution found Sparre may have faked his alibi claiming he was at work at a supermarket. The then-manager, who testified Monday, said he didn’t recall talking to authorities. He said a sworn statement filed with investigators that included his Social Security number is not from him.
The DNA test linking Sparre to hairs in a pair of glasses found inches from the bodies led Brunswick District Attorney Jackie Johnson to ask the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to reopen the murder investigation, which is ongoing.
Forensic examiner Gloria Dimick said Perry’s DNA doesn’t match the hair, but a sample from Sparre’s mother does match. Dimick said the new evidence does not prove Sparre is guilty but said “he could not be excluded.”
“The question is now whether or not they have enough evidence to convict the other person whose DNA they found,” Nichols said. “Just finding the DNA alone could be enough to convict a person whether or not this person is available to even to be tried is going to be the next question.”
Chad Head, the brother of Sparre’s first wife, who died in 2013, testified Monday that he remembered Sparre calling the family home in 1986, spewing profanity and saying he killed the Swains. He also used a racial slur. The Swains were Black; Sparre, who has said he’s innocent, is white. The words Head said he recalled were similar to those his family told police that Sparre used in 1986.
As police records indicate, Head said the call was recorded. He said relatives gave it to Camden County sheriff’s deputies. The tape now is among evidence that is missing.
Sparre’s second wife, Rhonda Tyson, testified that Sparre told her one day in the late 1980s that he killed the Swains.
“I was laying on the floor. He was straddling me with his hands on my throat,” Tyson testified. She recounted that Sparre said: “I will kill you like I killed those n-words in the church in Camden County.”
Andrew Ekonomou, a lawyer for the state, repeatedly objected to testimony not related to DNA evidence because the judge isn’t deciding who killed the Swains.
But Scarlett said in his order granting Perry’s motion that the DNA test linking Sparre to the scene would have resulted in a different verdict at Perry’s 2003 trial, which entitles him to a new trial. “Dennis Perry was convicted of double murder eighteen years after the fact without any physical evidence connecting him to the crime scene,” Scarlett wrote. “Newly discovered DNA evidence links another suspect, one whose alibi for the night of the murders may have been fabricated, to the key piece of evidence recovered from the crime scene.”
Perry’s legal team and the Georgia Innocence Project issued a joint statement Friday, thanking the judge for going forward with the hearing and granting the motion.
“We believe that this is an important first step towards ending Dennis Perry and his family’s 20-plus year nightmare, and we will continue to do everything we can to secure our client’s immediate release from prison,” said Phil Holladay, co-counsel at King & Spaulding."
The entire story can be read at:
