Monday, July 19, 2021

Rodney Reed: Texas; Day One: Evidentiary hearing begins: Publisher's note: KVUE live up-date..(Day 1: Monday July 18; 11:20 a.m). – The defense calls its first witness: Dr. Andrew Baker, a forensic pathologist. Dr. Baker disagrees with the time of death given by Dr. Roberto Bayardo, forensic pathologist the state used in the original trial. The court was shown video of Stacy Stites' body at the crime scene as part of Baker's explanation."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The evidentiary hearing, expected to last two weeks, began earlier today. My plan is to drop in on the hearing from time to time where there is particular grist for the Charles Smith Mill.  But don't limit yourselves.  There's a lot of very fascinating  other 'stuff' going on in the hearing room. KVUE Reporter Jenni Lee's is already providing comprehensive  live daily  updates at kvue.com.


Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;


------------------------------------------------------------------- 


FROM TODAY'S LIVE KVUE UP-DATE:  Start  reading at  bottom of entries.


2:30 p.m. – After a lunch break, the state is now cross-examining Dr. Andrew Baker, the defense’s first witness and forensic pathologist in Rodney Reed’s evidentiary hearing. The state is trying to find other reasons for Dr. Baker’s conclusions. 


12:20 p.m. – Dr. Baker disagrees with Dr. Roberto Bayardo’s previous testimony that Stacey Stites was anally assaulted. In fact, Dr. Baker says Dr. Bayardo mistook normal anal anatomy for abrasions and lacerations. Graphic images were used.


12 p.m. – Dr. Baker disagrees with State testimony about intact sperm with tails remaining in the vagina tract can only be 26 hours. He thinks intact sperm can live longer. This is important because the defense says this shows Stites was with Jimmy Fennell and not Reed.


11:41 a.m. – Dr. Baker shows court graphic images of Stites’ body of example of lividity, when gravity pulls blood down to lowest point of body after death and starts pooling. He says the fixed lividity in her arm area may mean her body was moved after she was killed.


11:26 a.m. – Dr. Baker shows more graphic images of Stites’ body in early decomposition like black lips and skin slippage (i.e. skin peels away easily). The point Dr. Baker is claiming is that Stites was dead a lot longer that the State claims.


11:20 a.m. – The defense calls its first witness: Dr. Andrew Baker, a forensic pathologist. Dr. Baker disagrees with the time of death given by Dr. Roberto Bayardo, forensic pathologist the state used in the original trial. The court was shown video of Stacy Stites' body at the crime scene as part of Baker's explanation. 


10:30 a.m. – It was an explosive start on day one of Reed's appeals hearing. It began with opening statements from the defense, which told the courtroom that the State used false evidence and withheld evidence to convict Reed."


Today's KVUE entire report can be read at: 

'

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/crime/rodney-reed-appeal-hearing/269-7612c5bc-38a5-4493-994b-c41e48a2ef6e


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;