Thursday, October 7, 2021

Alan Alter: San Diego, California: From our 'Something is terribly wrong in this picture' department: In 1987, he pleaded guilty to one count of recklessly starting a small 4-by-4 foot fire on the side of a highway Highway because he was “just trying to get someone to stop and basically get him off the highway.” Read this Courthouse News story by reporter Nicholas Ioving to discover how that small fire kept the Vietnam war veteran detained in a state hospital for 20 years. You might want to ask yourself why no one in The San Diego Public Defenders Office chose to immediately return the reporter's phone calls. HL.


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The white elephant in the forensic process: All too often it is the abundance of lawyers who are ill-equipped to tackle forensic evidence issues before courts and tribunal  - and judges and panel members who hide their ignorance of science and medicine beneath their impressive robes. It seems like  in all those years (20, in fact)  not a single defence lawyer, government counsel, panel member paused a moment or two to determine if Mark Alter could legally  have his freedom wrested away by  confining  him in a state hospital - for  lighting a small fire by the side of a highway. 


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "For two decades, multiple public defenders that represented Alter in annual "extension hearings” failed to notice that their client did not qualify for involuntary confinement because his crime was not a violent or eligible offense. “Defendant County of San Diego, through its public defender and alternate public defender offices, had a pervasive practice and custom of failing to ensure that its attorneys who were assigned to represent MDO clients review the requisite MDO statutes (Penal Code §§ 2960 and 2962) to determine whether their clients were eligible for involuntary commitment under the MDO law,” the 11-page complaint states. It wasn’t until 2018 when one of Alter’s lawyers noticed the mistake. After a habeas petition was filed, the San Diego District Attorney’s Office agreed to dismiss the MDO proceedings.  Alter was released from involuntary confinement on Jan. 7, 2021."

----------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Mark Alter told NBC 7 that despite his repeated attempts to visit his brother during his 20 years of confinement, state hospital employees would ignore his calls and forget to send him instructions on how to visit. Mark is named as his brother’s legal guardian in the complaint. The lawsuit seeks damages for professional negligence and municipal liability for unlawful polices and practices. “These employees breached their duty to use reasonable diligence commonly employed by members of the legal profession,” the complaint states."

----------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "San Diego sued for wrongly confining veteran in state hospital for 20 years," by Reporter Nicholas Iovino, published by Courthouse News on October 1, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: "The Vietnam veteran was forcibly detained under a program that allowed authorities to involuntarily commit people with mental disorders who commit certain crimes."

GIST: "A 72-year-old veteran was mistakenly forcibly committed to a state hospital for 20 years because of nearly two decades of legal malpractice by the San Diego Public Defender’s Office, according to a federal lawsuit filed Thursday.


Alan Alter, who served as a marine in the Vietnam War, has struggled with mental illness since he was discharged from the military in 1975, according to this complaint.


In 1987, Alter pleaded guilty to one count of recklessly starting a fire on forest land. Alter’s brother, Mark Alter, told NBC 7 San Diego that his brother started the small 4-by-4-foot fire on the side of Highway 67 in March 1986 because he was “just trying to get someone to stop and basically get him off the highway.” 


Alter served a year in jail for the felony fire charge, was released on probation, violated probation and, in 1996, was sentenced to two years in state prison for the parole violation.


 The California Board of Parole Hearings recommended Alter for a program that allows people with mental disorders to be involuntarily confined to a state hospital if they are convicted of violent crimes or other qualifying offenses.


 The Offenders with Mental Disorders program was created by a state law passed in 1985.


Through that program, Alter was “erroneously voluntarily committed” to Atascadero State Hospital near San Luis Obispo in January 2000, according to his complaint.


For two decades, multiple public defenders that represented Alter in annual "extension hearings” failed to notice that their client did not qualify for involuntary confinement because his crime was not a violent or eligible offense.


“Defendant County of San Diego, through its public defender and alternate public defender offices, had a pervasive practice and custom of failing to ensure that its attorneys who were assigned to represent MDO clients review the requisite MDO statutes (Penal Code §§ 2960 and 2962) to determine whether their clients were eligible for involuntary commitment under the MDO law,” the 11-page complaint states.


It wasn’t until 2018 when one of Alter’s lawyers noticed the mistake. After a habeas petition was filed, the San Diego District Attorney’s Office agreed to dismiss the MDO proceedings. 


Alter was released from involuntary confinement on Jan. 7, 2021.


“The failure of numerous County attorneys who represented plaintiff at annual 'extension hearings' over 17 years, to check the statute to determine whether plaintiff was eligible for extended incarceration under the MDO law, was the moving force and proximate cause of plaintiff being wrongfully incarcerated for approximately 20 years,” the lawsuit states.


Mark Alter told NBC 7 that despite his repeated attempts to visit his brother during his 20 years of confinement, state hospital employees would ignore his calls and forget to send him instructions on how to visit.


Mark is named as his brother’s legal guardian in the complaint.

The lawsuit seeks damages for professional negligence and municipal liability for unlawful polices and practices.


“These employees breached their duty to use reasonable diligence commonly employed by members of the legal profession,” the complaint states.

Alter is represented by attorneys Joseph McMullen, Michael Marrinan and Thomas E. Robertson, all of San Diego. 


The San Diego Public Defender’s Office and San Diego County Counsel’s Office did not immediately return phone calls requesting comment Friday."


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.courthousenews.com/san-diego-sued-for-wrongly-confining-veteran-in-state-hospital-for-20-years/


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: “It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.