Thursday, October 28, 2021

John Grant RIP: Julius Jones: Oklahoma: Bulletin: Horrible news: US Supreme Court overturns stays of execution; Reuters (Reporter Sharon Bernstein) reports a witness saying that John Grant convulsed and vomited before dying..."Dale Baich, one of the attorneys representing Grant, called Thursday's execution "problematic." "There should be no more executions in Oklahoma until we go to trial in February to address the state’s problematic lethal injection protocol," Baich said. Grant had been a plaintiff in a lawsuit set to go to trial next year challenging the three-drug protocol as inhumane, but the state refused to postpone his execution to accommodate the case."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Lawyers for Grant and five other condemned prisoners had argued that the state violated their right to religious liberty by asking them to name an acceptable method of execution, which the prisoners said forced them to participate in their own deaths. They also argued that Oklahoma's newest lethal injection protocol is too similar to a prior method that led to the botched executions. The planned executions run counter to trends in most U.S. states, where the use of capital punishment is declining."

STORY: "Condemned Oklahoma prisoner  convulsed, vomited before dying, witness say by Reporter Sharon Bernstein, published by Reuters on October 28, 2021.

GIST: "Condemned Oklahoma prisoner John Grant convulsed and vomited before dying from a cocktail of drugs on Thursday as the state conducted its first execution in years despite questions about its lethal injection protocol, a witness to the death reported.


Grant, 60, died at 4:21 p.m. (2121 GMT), the state said. It was Oklahoma's first execution since three botched attempts - including one that was called off because the wrong drug had been supplied - led to a halt in 2015.


The three-drug cocktail is meant to first render the recipient unconscious and unable to feel pain, followed by others that lead to death.


But a media witness said Grant convulsed two dozen times and vomited before dying.


"As the drugs began to flow, the first drug, midazolam, he exhaled deeply," Sean Murphy said in a news briefing posted online. "He began convulsing, about two dozen times, full body convulsions."


Vomit covered his face until a prison official wiped it off, Murphy said.

Dale Baich, one of the attorneys representing Grant, called Thursday's execution "problematic."


"There should be no more executions in Oklahoma until we go to trial in February to address the state’s problematic lethal injection protocol," Baich said.


Grant had been a plaintiff in a lawsuit set to go to trial next year challenging the three-drug protocol as inhumane, but the state refused to postpone his execution to accommodate the case.


The Oklahoma Department of Corrections did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


After Grant died on Thursday, his lawyer, Sarah Jernigan, said he had tried to atone and understand his actions "more than any other client I have worked with."


She said he was a victim of brutality both at home and at the hands of Oklahoma's youth detention system, and did not receive appropriate mental health treatment before he murdered prison employee Gay Carter in 1998 while incarcerated for another crime.


Last-minute intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a stay of execution for Grant and Julius Jones, who is scheduled to be put to death on Nov. 18.


Jones, 41, was sentenced to death for murdering an insurance executive gunned down in his driveway. He has maintained his innocence for two decades in a case that has attracted attention from celebrities and anti-death penalty activists.


In ordering the state to delay the executions on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals said a lower court had unfairly denied the two men delays granted to numerous other defendants challenging the lethal injection protocol.


But the Supreme Court on Thursday vacated that stay without commenting further on the case.


Lawyers for Grant and five other condemned prisoners had argued that the state violated their right to religious liberty by asking them to name an acceptable method of execution, which the prisoners said forced them to participate in their own deaths.


They also argued that Oklahoma's newest lethal injection protocol is too similar to a prior method that led to the botched executions.


The planned executions run counter to trends in most U.S. states, where the use of capital punishment is declining.


Thirty-six U.S. states and the District of Columbia have either abolished the death penalty or have not carried out an execution in the past 10 years, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, which tracks executions.


Conservative states including Texas and Missouri, however, have bucked that trend, as did the administration of Republican former U.S. President Donald Trump, which resumed federal executions in 2020 after a 17-year hiatus, putting 13 prisoners to death.


The local archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church called for an end to capital punishment and asked parishioners to pray for Grant."


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/oklahoma-can-carry-out-executions-john-grant-julius-jones-high-court-rules-2021-10-28/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.