Monday, September 6, 2021

Curtis Flower: Mississippi: (Jailhouse informants and much more): Having endured six trials, four death sentences and nearly 23 years behind bars before charges against him were dropped - he is suing the prosecutor and investigators he believes are responsible for his ordeal: The misconduct alleged includes: The lawsuit alleges misconduct includes coercion of witnesses, failing to thoroughly investigate alternate suspects, and excluding Black people from serving on juries in the case."..."The lawsuit alleges that Johnson pressured Clemmie Fleming to claim that she’d seen Flowers near Tardy Furniture on the morning of the murders. She later recanted her testimony in an interview with In the Dark, saying she never knew which day she’d seen Flowers near the store. The complaint also accuses Evans and Johnson of persuading Odell Hallmon to falsely testify that Flowers had confessed to him while the two were in prison together. Hallmon was a key witness in the last four Flowers trials. He admitted to In the Dark that his testimony was a “bunch of lies” he told in exchange for leniency from Evans in his own criminal cases."...Link to full complaint provided. HL.



PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "Confidential, often jailhouse informants, have probably been around for as long as there have been jails and inmates willing to trade information for a favor or two — including more privileges, a shorter sentence or dropping of charges. They commonly turn up in investigations which are not going anywhere - as in ‘no DNA'.   “Incentivized informants” is the legal term of art, but too often they also have “a strong incentive to lie,” said Michelle Feldman, state campaigns director for the Innocence Project. That explains why, according to the project’s figures, 16 percent of DNA exonerations involved false testimony by informants. Broader studies of wrongful convictions put the figure as high as 46 percent. Innocent people have spent decades in prison while the guilty remained free, and often the victims of those informants never see justice either — a lose-lose-lose for the criminal justice system." Boston Globe Editorial:  February 15, 2020.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Attorneys for Flowers filed a lawsuit on Friday in federal court in Mississippi against District Attorney Doug Evans. The suit also names John Johnson, a former investigator for the district attorney’s office, along with Jack Matthews and Wayne Miller, who worked on the case for the Mississippi Highway Patrol. The suit accuses Evans and the other defendants of concocting a murder case against Flowers that violated his rights under the Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and sections of the Mississippi Constitution. Flowers seeks damages from each of the defendants and “further relief as the Court deems equitable and just.” 

STORY: "Curtis Flowers sues District Attorney Doug Evans," by Reporter Natalie Jablonski, published by APM Reports on September 3, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: "The Mississippi man was tried six times for the same crime, alleged in a lawsuit that Evans and three investigators committed misconduct  that led to his wrongful imprisonment for more than two decades."

GIST: "Curtis Flowers — the Mississippi man who endured six trials, four death sentences and nearly 23 years behind bars before charges against him were dropped — is suing the prosecutor and investigators he believes are responsible for his ordeal.   

Attorneys for Flowers filed a lawsuit on Friday in federal court in Mississippi against District Attorney Doug Evans. The suit also names John Johnson, a former investigator for the district attorney’s office, along with Jack Matthews and Wayne Miller, who worked on the case for the Mississippi Highway Patrol.


The suit accuses Evans and the other defendants of concocting a murder case against Flowers that violated his rights under the Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and sections of the Mississippi Constitution. Flowers seeks damages from each of the defendants and “further relief as the Court deems equitable and just.” 

The lawsuit alleges misconduct including coercion of witnesses, failing to thoroughly investigate alternate suspects, and excluding Black people from serving on juries in the case. “Given the absence of any solid evidence against Mr. Flowers, Defendants engaged in repeated misconduct to fabricate a case that never should have been brought,” the complaint states. 

Evans didn't respond to messages left at his office and home on Friday. Miller said he had no knowledge of the suit and didn't comment. Johnson and Matthews couldn't be reached for comment.

In a legal saga spanning more than two decades, Flowers was tried six times for the 1996 murders of four people at Tardy Furniture in Winona, Mississippi. An investigation by APM Reports’ In the Dark podcast found that the case was based on flawed and unreliable evidence. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed Flowers’ last conviction in June 2019, ruling that Evans had violated Flowers’ constitutional rights by excluding Black people from the jury. After Evans recused himself from the case, the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office dropped the charges against Flowers in September 2020, and the state later awarded him $500,000 in compensation. 

“Curtis Flowers can never get back the 23 years of his life that he spent in prison when he should have been home with his family and friends,” said Kaitlyn Golden, one of the attorneys representing Flowers, in a statement. “The law allows innocent people to file lawsuits seeking to hold state officials accountable for misconduct leading to wrongful imprisonment. With this case, we hope to do just that, and to seek some redress for Curtis Flowers for the horrors he endured over more than two decades behind bars.”

Though several courts have found that Evans committed prosecutorial misconduct, Flowers’ lawsuit faces some imposing legal barriers. The Supreme Court has held that prosecutors have absolute immunity from civil litigation for actions they took as part of their official duties. That standard has made it nearly impossible for wrongly convicted people to successfully sue prosecutors. 

“While prosecutors have immunity against federal law claims for actions taken as a prosecutor, we are suing Doug Evans under federal law for his actions in an investigative capacity and also under state law for malicious prosecution,” Rob McDuff, an attorney for Flowers, wrote in an email on Friday. 

Government officials such as investigators and law enforcement officers are also protected against liability, though to a lesser degree, by qualified immunity. The Supreme Court has ruled that these officials can’t be sued personally for their government work unless they have violated “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” 

The lawsuit alleges that Johnson pressured Clemmie Fleming to claim that she’d seen Flowers near Tardy Furniture on the morning of the murders. She later recanted her testimony in an interview with In the Dark, saying she never knew which day she’d seen Flowers near the store. 

The complaint also accuses Evans and Johnson of persuading Odell Hallmon to falsely testify that Flowers had confessed to him while the two were in prison together. Hallmon was a key witness in the last four Flowers trials. He admitted to In the Dark that his testimony was a “bunch of lies” he told in exchange for leniency from Evans in his own criminal cases.   

There are few other avenues for holding Evans accountable for his handling of Flowers’ case. As an elected official, Evans doesn’t have a boss. He was reelected in November 2019 to another four-year term in office after running unopposed. Evans did face a class-action lawsuit — filed by four Black plaintiffs and a central Mississippi branch of the NAACP — for excluding Black people from juries. A judge dismissed that lawsuit last year on procedural grounds. Evans has so far received no public discipline from the Mississippi Bar Association."

The entire story can be read at:
https://www.apmreports.org/story/2021/09/03/curtis-flowers-sues-district-attorney-doug-evans

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;