Thursday, September 23, 2021

The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act: Bulletin: Major (Unwelcome) Development: "Bipartisan police reform bill is officially dead in Congress," Vice News ( Senior Political Reporter Cameron Joseph) reports...“After months of exhausting every possible pathway to a bipartisan deal, it remains out of reach right now, even after working collaboratively with and securing the support of policing groups like the Fraternal Order of Police and International Association of Chiefs of Police for our proposals,” Democrats’ lead negotiator, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, said in a statement. “Unfortunately, even with this law enforcement support and further compromises we offered, there was still too wide a gulf with our negotiating partners and we faced significant obstacles to securing a bipartisan deal. The time has come to explore all other options to achieve meaningful and commonsense policing reform,” the statement continued."


  • SOME OF THE DEAD BILL'S PROVISIONS RELEVANT TO THIS BLOG;
  • Prohibit federal police officers from using chokeholds or other carotid holds (which led to the death of Eric Garner), and require state and local law enforcement agencies that receive federal funding to adopt the same prohibition[4]
  • Prohibit the issuance of no-knock warrants (warrants that allow police to conduct a raid without knocking or announcing themselves) in federal drug investigations, and provide incentives to the states to enact a similar prohibition.[4]
  • Change the threshold for the permissible use of force by federal law enforcement officers from "reasonableness" to only when "necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury."[4]
  • Mandate that federal officers use deadly force only as a last resort and that de-escalation be attempted, and condition federal funding to state and local law enforcement agencies on the adoption of the same policy.[

Wikipedia: 
----------------------------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Bipartisan police reform bill is officially dead in Congress," by  senior Political Reporter Cameron Joseph, published by Vice News on September 22, 2021.


SUB-HEADING: "Democratic Senator Corey Booker and his GOP counterpart Senator Tim Scott  had been negotiating a bipartisan police reform bill for months. But it just died."


GIST: "A monthslong effort to craft a bipartisan police reform bill officially fell apart on Wednesday, after GOP negotiators rejected Democrats’ final offer. 


The last version of Democrats’ proposal—and the bare minimum of what they said they could accept in a bill—would have barred officers from using chokeholds, limited the transfer of military-grade equipment to local police departments, and created a federal database on police officers’ misconduct.


“After months of exhausting every possible pathway to a bipartisan deal, it remains out of reach right now, even after working collaboratively with and securing the support of policing groups like the Fraternal Order of Police and International Association of Chiefs of Police for our proposals,” Democrats’ lead negotiator, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, said in a statement.


“Unfortunately, even with this law enforcement support and further compromises we offered, there was still too wide a gulf with our negotiating partners and we faced significant obstacles to securing a bipartisan deal. The time has come to explore all other options to achieve meaningful and commonsense policing reform,” the statement continued.


Booker and Scott—two of the three Black men in the Senate—had negotiated diligently with California Democratic Rep. Karen Bass for months to try to craft a bill that would make significant progress toward reining in police brutality and creating accountability for bad actors.


Over the summer, it looked like they were close to finalizing a deal. Booker, Bass, and Scott put out a joint statement saying they’d reached an agreement on the framework for a bill. But then on Wednesday, Booker called Scott to let him know Democrats were done negotiating, Booker’s office confirmed to VICE News.


Scott and the GOP strongly opposed changing the legal doctrine of qualified immunity that keeps police officers from being sued when they break the law. While Democrats had tentatively accepted a watered-down workaround that would have reformed rules around filing lawsuits against police departments but not addressed legal precedent that makes it nearly impossible to sue individual officers, the bill was contingent on them getting other important parts of the deal included.


And as the summer dragged into fall, Democrats became increasingly convinced that Scott didn’t really want a deal and felt that whenever they were close on an agreement, Scott kept moving the goalposts.


“He didn’t want a deal and torpedoed it. In the months since we’ve made concessions, tried to compromise, but he wasn’t willing to move,” a Senate Democratic aide told VICE News.


Scott’s office didn’t respond to requests for comment on why the talks had collapsed.


According to Democratic Senate aides involved in the negotiations, the final straw was when Scott balked at codifying an executive order President Trump had issued last summer into law. That order, which was viewed as a police-friendly half-measure when it was issued last summer, aimed to create a national database of police misconduct and created new federal guidelines for use of force.


That came as a shift, as Scott and Booker thought they had a broad agreement on that point as far back as June."


----------------------------------------------------------


The entire story can be read at:


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;