Monday, September 13, 2021

Kevin Strickland: Missouri: Bulletin: On-going hearing: Caught in an epic conflict between a county prosecutor who believes he is innocent - and the state Attorney General who has fought tooth and nail against court proceedings aimed at freeing him - Kevin Strickland must wait even longer: The judge, conducting an on-going hearing, says he needs more time to review the case. Reporter Sam Hartle, KSHB..."The parties will reconvene on Friday morning, Sept. 17, where the judge could ultimately set a date to hear evidence in the case to vacate Strickland’s 1979 murder conviction."


STORY: (Monday 13 September, 2021):  "A Jackson County judge said Monday that more time is needed as he reviews evidence in a case that could lead to Kevin Strickland’s release from jail.

Earlier this month, a Missouri appeals court ruled that the Missouri Attorney General’s office needed more time to review a filing made by Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney Jean Peters Baker’s office that would vacate the triple murder sentence against Strickland.

Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Kevin Harrell had previously set Monday’s hearing for arguments from both the AG and Jackson County prosecutor’s office.

Given the complexity of the case, the judge gave both sides until 5 p.m. Wednesday to file any proposed orders.

The parties will reconvene on Friday morning, Sept. 17, where the judge could ultimately set a date to hear evidence in the case to vacate Strickland’s 1979 murder conviction."

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.kshb.com/news/crime/jackson-county-judge-continues-review-of-kevin-strickland-case

------------------------------------------------

More details on motions argued at Monday's hearing: Luke Nozicka: Kansas City Star: "A Jackson County Circuit Court judge will decide on Friday whether to recuse himself from local prosecutors’ efforts to exonerate and free Kevin Strickland. During a hearing Monday, Judge Kevin Harrell heard arguments from lawyers with the Missouri Attorney General’s Office, who contend Harrell should rescue himself from the case and disqualify other judges in Jackson County because the circuit’s presiding judge, Dale Youngs, previously said he agrees Strickland, 62, should be exonerated. Jackson County prosecutors, who say Strickland has wrongly spent 43 years in prison, and his lawyers opposed the request and argued that Youngs’ public statement should not disqualify every judge in the circuit. One of Strickland’s attorneys, Bob Hoffman of the law firm Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, called the further delay of an evidentiary hearing that could lead to Strickland’s freedom an “injustice.” He noted Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker called for Strickland’s immediate release May 10 — more than four months ago — after determining he is innocent in a 1978 triple murder. “Here we are, and it’s Sept. 13; he’s still in prison,” Hoffman told reporters. “So, nothing’s changed for him.” Asked if the delays could dissuade other county prosecutors from seeking to free innocent prisoners, Hoffman said he believes that is “exactly what is happening here.” He added that lawyers with the attorney general’s office, which contends Strickland is guilty, have “attacked” one of the prosecutors who reviewed Strickland’s innocence claim. On Thursday, former Missouri Supreme Court chief justice Edward “Chip” Robertson — who has been called a “a giant in Missouri jurisprudence” — joined the prosecutors’ team trying to free Strickland. Utilizing a new law that went into effect Aug. 28, Jackson County prosecutors filed a 25-page motion that argues Strickland’s innocence is “clear and convincing” in the April 25, 1978, killings at 6934 S. Benton Ave. in Kansas City. The attorney general’s office filed motions in the case, including the one that requested the recusals. Its lawyers cited a letter Baker put out that said Youngs “concurs on behalf” of the court that Strickland’s conviction should be set aside. Senate Minority Leader John Rizzo, who wrote the relevant provision in the new state law, said the legislation was not intended to allow the attorney general’s office to file such motions. In a ruling earlier this month, however, an appeals court said the attorney general’s motions must be considered. At the hearing, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Clarke argued that the appearance of bias was enough for recusal. He said news coverage of the case has declared Strickland innocent, which has not been proved in court. Kate Brubacher, a Jackson County assistant prosecutor, said headlines are not “grounds for recusal” and called the attorney general’s motion “another attempt to delay justice” for Strickland. Hoffman told the judge that the new law, which allows local prosecutors to seek to free prisoners deemed innocent, says the case should be decided in the court in which the person was convicted. He asserted that Youngs’ comments were not improper, asked for the case to proceed quickly and noted that as the state continues to fight with the state, Strickland remains behind bars. “That is the height of injustice,” he said. In another motion, the attorney general’s office, under Eric Schmitt, asked that the case be moved from criminal to civil court. Harrell will also announce his ruling on that motion Friday morning. Baker suggested that an evidentiary hearing, during which prosecutors will argue Strickland is innocent, be set for Oct. 4 through the 6th. Such a hearing, however, has not been scheduled. “Time is elapsing every single day,” Baker said. In spite of the delays, Hoffman said Strickland, who was 18 when he was arrested, remains “very resilient.” “He’s handling it a lot better than I would,” Hoffman said."

https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article254187308.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;