Saturday, September 11, 2021

Damien Echols: Arkansas: (West Memphis Three): Bulletin: He has filed a lawsuit over 'destroyed' evidence he believes could have proved his innocence, THV11 reports, noting that, Echols and his lawyers want access to the information and evidence in order to conduct new DNA testing in the case in hopes of finding closure in the case."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The new lawsuit claims the West Memphis Police Department has not complied with multiple Freedom of Information Act requests, asking for information and evidence."


STORY: "Damien Echols files lawsuit against West Memphis police over 'destroyed' evidence," published by THV11 on September 10, 2021.


SUB-HEADING: "Damien Echols, one of the West Memphis Three, has said he believes the department could have destroyed the evidence that could prove his innocence."


GIST: "Attorneys for Damien Echols, one of the West Memphis Three, are filing a lawsuit against the West Memphis Police Department.


The new lawsuit claims the West Memphis Police Department has not complied with multiple Freedom of Information Act requests, asking for information and evidence.


Echols has said he believes the department could have destroyed the evidence that could prove his innocence.


According to the lawsuit, it has been over 60 days since Echols' lawyers sent the FOIA request to the police department and have received no response.


Echols, along with Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley, were charged and convicted of the murders of three boys in 1994 despite not having any DNA evidence connecting the three to the crimes.


Echols and his lawyers want access to the information and evidence in order to conduct new DNA testing in the case in hopes of finding closure in the case.


After spending nearly 20 years in prison, the three men walked free on an Alford plea in 2011, which allowed them to maintain their innocence.


"I know to the core of my soul that the only reason the state did not murder me and sweep this case under the rug, is that people all over the world were paying attention to it," Echols said when we spoke to him on the 10th anniversary of his release.


We've reached out to the West Memphis Police Department multiple times, but have not received a response.


Echols' lawyer says if the evidence is never found, they could seek damages from the state."


Thee entire story can be read at:

https://www.thv11.com/article/news/crime/true-crime/damien-echols-lawsuit-west-memphis-three-destroyed-evidence/91-b49d92e8-3c59-47ba-ba4f-2cce9edb950b

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;