QUOTE OF THE DAY: ""We’ve been talking to people for the last 23 years ‘till we’re blue
in the face.” said Rodrick Reed, Rodney Reed's brother. With just over
70 days to go, time is running out. Though days may be slipping away,
the Reed family says their hope is not. “That feeling gives us hope, you
know. It gives us the strength to
continue to fight, when you know you got others that believe,” Rodrick
Reed said of those gathered at the restaurant. “These people don’t know
my brother from Adam, but they do know right from wrong.”
STORY: "Supporters of Rodney Reed write letters calling for clemency," by reporter Shannon Ryan, published by FOX 7 on September 8, 2019.
GIST: "Supporters of Rodney Reed gathered at a restaurant in North Austin Sunday morning. The group wrote letters to politicians and local media demanding Reed be granted clemency. Reed is accused of raping and killing Stacey Stites, 19, in
Bastrop County in 1996. Reed says the two were romantically involved. The same year, Reed was convicted of Stites’
murder, he was charged with three counts of sex assault and one count of
aggravated sex assault. DNA evidence was present in each case. "That stuff is not true. I feel if that had been true they would have
tried me on that stuff. This is not true.” Reed said in a 2015
interview. Reed, and his family have always maintained his innocence. They
believe crucial DNA evidence has not been tested in the Stites case. “There are many questions about [Reed's] guilt and the fairness of
his trial.” wrote Kyle resident Barbara Finlay in her letter. The Reed family also believes ex-cop Jimmy
Fennell, Stites’ former fiancé, is the culprit. Fennell spent years in
prison for an unrelated sexual assault “We’ve been talking to people for the last 23 years ‘till we’re blue in the face.” said Rodrick Reed, Rodney Reed's brother. With just over 70 days to go, time is running out. Though days may be slipping away, the Reed family says their hope is not. “That feeling gives us hope, you know. It gives us the strength to
continue to fight, when you know you got others that believe,” Rodrick
Reed said of those gathered at the restaurant. “These people don’t know
my brother from Adam, but they do know right from wrong.”
The entire story can be read at:
http://www.fox7austin.com/news/local-news/supporters-of-rodney-reed-write-letters-calling-for-clemency
SIGN CHANGE.ORG PETITION TO TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TO STOP RODNEY REED'S EXECUTION, AT LINK BELOW:
"The
State of Texas may execute an innocent man. Rodney Reed was wrongfully
convicted of the rape and murder of Stacey Stites in 1998. Semen
collected from Stites’ body belonged to Reed, a fact that was explained
by a consensual sexual relationship , evidence of which was not
presented at trial, despite numerous witnesses who could testify to the
affair. Nor was the evidence that Stites’ fiancé, Jimmy Fenell Jr., had a
history of sexual violence and failed a polygraph test about the
murder. Fennell was released from prison in 2018, after serving a ten
year sentence for raping a woman while in his custody as a Georgetown,
TX police officer. Other evidence that could clear Reed includes: DNA
found on beer cans at the site that linked two police officers to the
crime (withheld from the defense at trial); that police failed to search
Fennell and Stites’ apartment; and threats Fennell had made that he
would kill Stites if she cheated on him. Reed, a black man, was
convicted of killing a white woman by an all-white jury. Over the years,
Reed's defense has uncovered a mountain of evidence pointing to his
innocence - and corroborating the defense theory that Jimmy Fennell was
involved in the murder. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) and
the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals both previously denied Reed the
chance to present this evidence in open court. Now Rodney Reed has a new appeal pending before the CCA, which
includes explosive new findings regarding Stacy Stites' time of
death and several new witness statements corroborating the defense's
alternate theory of the crime.: In the course of filming a recent A&E special about Reed's case
(Dead Again: Dead Man Talking), an investigator came to the conclusion
that Stacey was murdered several hours earlier than the time frame
advanced by the original medical examiner and the prosecution at trial.
Further examination of the forensic evidence by other experts proves
that Stacey was murdered closer to 10 PM, placing her in the apartment
she shared with her fiancé and former police officer Jimmy Fennell at a
time when Fennell claimed to be home. More recently, further new witness testimony was added to the appeal,
based on evidence uncovered during a CCN documentary story about Reed's
case. That evidence, as well as the new forensics evidence, was heard
in hearings in early October of 2017. Following the hearings, Judge Doug Shaver, presiding, sent a
recommendation against a new trial for Reed to the CCA. The CCA has yet
to rule on this appeal. The CCA dismissed a separate motion for further DNA testing on
important items from the crime scene. Rodney's defense team appealed to
the U.S. Supreme Court, who ruled in June of 2018 against more DNA
testing.We, the undersigned, believe it is a travesty of justice to deny
Rodney Reed the chance to present the above evidence to a jury.
We demand that Reed not be issued a warrant for execution, and that he
be granted a new trial where the evidence of his innocence and Fennell’s
possible guilt can be presented, and that the execution of Rodney Reed
not go forward under any circumstances."
https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-execution-of-rodney-reed
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;