PUBLISHER'S NOTE: A case which promises to be of great interest to the readers of this Blog: "From the beginning, Richardson has insisted the baby was 
stillborn. But even as a coroner has been unable to determine a cause of
 death, prosecutors insist the cause was homicide, and that Richardson, 
now 20, buried the evidence so she could continue on with a 
picture-perfect teenage lifestyle. The case 
exploded, becoming a tabloid-fare narrative about an all-American 
cheerleader accused of secretly killing her own child because she and 
her family were “pretty obsessed” with external appearances, as Warren 
County Prosecutor David P. Fornshell said in 2017. He claimed Richardson
 burned the baby’s corpse too — sinister details that later turned out 
to be incorrect, Richardson’s attorney said, but that nevertheless only 
fueled nonstop coverage. Photographers camped outside the family’s home 
in small-town Carlisle, waiting to share the latest snippets of the 
family’s lives. Antiabortion activists picketed Richardson’s hearings, demanding justice for Baby Jane Doe. But
 Richardson didn’t kill the baby, her attorney, Charles M. Rittgers, 
insisted to prospective jurors Tuesday during jury selection. Instead, 
he said, “This case was about a massive rush to judgment."
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog:
---------------------------------------------------------------
 PUBLISHER'S NOTE: This Blog is interested in false confessions because 
of the disturbing number of exonerations in the USA, Canada and multiple
 other jurisdictions throughout the world, where, in the absence of 
incriminating forensic evidence the conviction is based on 
self-incrimination  (as well as false identification and jailhouse 
informants) – and because of the growing body of  scientific research 
showing how vulnerable suspects (especially juveniles)  are to widely 
used interrogation methods  such as  the notorious ‘Reid Technique.""
 
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
---------------------------------------------------------------
PASSAGE OF THE DAY:  "Prosecutor David 
Fornshell said he believes Richardson had a fair trial and that 
"advocacy on both sides was very well done." The prosecution 
alleged Richardson never intended to keep her daughter, so she killed 
her and buried her on the outskirts of her family’s Carlisle home. The 
defense said the baby was stillborn; defense attorney focused on 
Richardson’s health history and argued her panicked, furtive reactions 
to learning of her pregnancy were not necessarily signs of malice — just
 terror."
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
STORY: "Brooke Skylar Richardson not guilty in 2017 death of newborn daughter," by reporters Abby Anstead and Evan Millward) published by WCPO Cincinnati on September 12, 2019.
GIST: "Brooke Skylar Richardson cried as the jury handed down a not guilty 
verdict in the 2017 death of her newborn daughter. The jury found
 Richardson not guilty of aggravated murder, not guilty of involuntary 
manslaughter, not guilty of child endangerment and guilty of abuse of a 
corpse. The jury, comprised of seven women and five men, reached a 
verdict in less than five hours on Thursday. The jury 
had been deliberating since 11:11 a.m. after two hours of closing 
arguments, two days of defense testimony and four days or prosecution 
testimony. Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said there’s a 
“presumption against incarceration” for Felony 4 and Felony 5 charges. 
Richardson was charged with Abuse of a Corpse as an F-5. Deters said 
Richardson likely won’t see jail time and will probably go into some 
sort of community control program. Warren County Prosecutor David 
Fornshell said he believes Richardson had a fair trial and that 
"advocacy on both sides was very well done." The prosecution 
alleged Richardson never intended to keep her daughter, so she killed 
her and buried her on the outskirts of her family’s Carlisle home. The 
defense said the baby was stillborn; defense attorney focused on 
Richardson’s health history and argued her panicked, furtive reactions 
to learning of her pregnancy were not necessarily signs of malice — just
 terror. Dr. William Andrew at Hilltop Obstetrics and Gynecology 
determined Richardson was about 32 weeks pregnant on April 26, 2017. 
Richardson didn’t tell anyone about the pregnancy, not even her parents 
or the father of the child. She gave birth alone in her family’s 
home in the middle of the night on May 7, 2017, just two days after she 
attended her senior prom. She then buried the baby near the treeline in 
the backyard. Richardson went back to Hilltop Obstetrics and 
Gynecology on July 12, 2017 to obtain birth control and told Dr. Casey 
Boyce she “had it alone” in her house and “buried it” in the backyard. Doctors
 contacted authorities, and investigators went to Richardson’s home on 
July 14, 2017. Richardson’s father, Scott Richardson, drove her to the 
Carlisle police station, where she detailed what happened for the first 
time in a two-hour interview. A tearful Richardson told 
authorities in the interview that she “didn’t really want to have” her 
baby but she “never meant to hurt her.” The baby wasn’t alive, she
 said. The newborn didn’t have a heartbeat, and she didn’t make any 
noises. Her eyes were closed, and Richardson said she can't remember if 
she saw an umbilical cord.
The same day, investigators found the baby’s remains in a shallow grave in the backyard of the Richardson family home."
The same day, investigators found the baby’s remains in a shallow grave in the backyard of the Richardson family home."
https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/warren-county/lebanon/jury-reaches-verdict-in-brooke-skylar-richardson-murder-trial
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
