PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "From the beginning, Richardson has insisted the baby was stillborn. But even as a coroner has been unable to determine a cause of death, prosecutors insist the cause was homicide, and that Richardson, now 20, buried the evidence so she could continue on with a picture-perfect teenage lifestyle. The case exploded, becoming a tabloid-fare narrative about an all-American cheerleader accused of secretly killing her own child because she and her family were “pretty obsessed” with external appearances, as Warren County Prosecutor David P. Fornshell said in 2017. He claimed Richardson burned the baby’s corpse too — sinister details that later turned out to be incorrect, Richardson’s attorney said, but that nevertheless only fueled nonstop coverage. Photographers camped outside the family’s home in small-town Carlisle, waiting to share the latest snippets of the family’s lives. Antiabortion activists picketed Richardson’s hearings, demanding justice for Baby Jane Doe. But Richardson didn’t kill the baby, her attorney, Charles M. Rittgers, insisted to prospective jurors Tuesday during jury selection. Instead, he said, “This case was about a massive rush to judgment.”
PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "What the prosecution didn’t disclose to jurors Tuesday, he (Defence Attorney Charles M. Rittgers) said, was that the doctor who thought the remains were burned later recanted that testimony and said she made a mistake. ((Prosecutor David. P.) Fornshell has previously disputed Rittgers’s characterization of the experts’ opinions.) By then, Richardson was already indicted — based in part on the erroneous charred bones details, Rittgers said. Those details also led detectives to try wrangling a confession out of Richardson throughout hours of questioning. Holding her hands at the table in an interrogation room, “as if they were her friends,” Rittgers said, the police told her it would be better if she said she was trying to cremate the body. Eventually, Rittgers said, after denying she burned the baby 17 times, and after describing the baby being born dead 29 times, she seemed to relent, saying she did try to cremate her. Rittgers said they “broke her down.” “What happens when that doctor who made this horrible mistake changes her mind and tells everyone I was wrong, the bones weren’t burnt?” Rittgers said. “What happened? The police didn’t hit a reset button. The prosecutors didn’t hit a reset button. … They disregard all truth that does not fit into their story. And that’s why we’re here today.”
STORY: "A teen said she buried her stillborn baby in the backyard after prom. Now she’s on trial for murder," by reporter Meagan Flynn, published by The Washington Post on September 4, 2019.
PHOTO CAPTION:  "Brooke
 Skylar Richardson sits with one of her attorneys during jury selection 
in her trial at the Warren County Courthouse on Tuesday in Lebanon, 
Ohio. Richardson, 20, is accused of killing and burying her newborn 
daughter in her family's backyard in southwest Ohio. "
GIST: "For
 months, nobody knew 18-year-old Brooke Skylar Richardson was pregnant. 
The bump barely showed when the college-bound high school senior wore a 
cheerleading uniform on the sidelines, or a bikini on spring break, or 
even when she wore a snug-fitting sparkly red gown to prom less than two
 days before giving birth on May 7, 2017. Even then, no one but Richardson and her gynecologist knew, prosecutors said in court Tuesday in Warren County, Ohio. It
 was the middle of the night when the baby came, prosecutors said. 
Richardson’s parents were asleep downstairs; her brother was asleep 
across the hall. The teenager went to the bathroom — and emerged with a 
lifeless baby. Alone, she buried the infant in 
the backyard and went back inside, still telling no one, prosecutors 
said. She graduated high school a few weeks later, and spent the next 
two months preparing for college at the University of Cincinnati. Then, 
one afternoon in July 2017, the police called. Richardson’s gynecologist
 had reported the baby’s death to the Warren County coroner, leaving the
 cause of death blank. Now, police wanted to know: How did the infant die? That’s
 the same question a jury will be left to decide as Richardson’s trial 
on charges of aggravated murder in the death of her baby begins this 
week. From the beginning, Richardson has insisted the baby was 
stillborn. But even as a coroner has been unable to determine a cause of
 death, prosecutors insist the cause was homicide, and that Richardson, 
now 20, buried the evidence so she could continue on with a 
picture-perfect teenage lifestyle. The case 
exploded, becoming a tabloid-fare narrative about an all-American 
cheerleader accused of secretly killing her own child because she and 
her family were “pretty obsessed” with external appearances, as Warren 
County Prosecutor David P. Fornshell said in 2017. He claimed Richardson
 burned the baby’s corpse too — sinister details that later turned out 
to be incorrect, Richardson’s attorney said, but that nevertheless only 
fueled nonstop coverage. Photographers camped outside the family’s home 
in small-town Carlisle, waiting to share the latest snippets of the 
family’s lives. Antiabortion activists picketed Richardson’s hearings, demanding justice for Baby Jane Doe. But
 Richardson didn’t kill the baby, her attorney, Charles M. Rittgers, 
insisted to prospective jurors Tuesday during jury selection. Instead, 
he said, “This case was about a massive rush to judgment.” Warren
 County Assistant Prosecutor Julie Kraft said Tuesday that it all began 
in August 2016, when Richardson broke off a relationship with a guy she 
had been dating for about a month. She would 
spend much of her senior year of high school pregnant, but it was hard 
for friends and family to tell. For years, Richardson had suffered from 
anorexia and bulimia, friends and family told Cosmopolitan last year.
 They could tell in the spring of 2017 that she had put on weight — but 
the last thing they wanted to do was ask her why. Richardson had a new 
boyfriend she met at school. She was on the honor roll and had been 
accepted to college. Maybe she was just feeling more comfortable in her 
body, they thought. “I
 was happy because I was like, ‘Oh, she’s met this nice boy. She doesn’t
 care about how she looks anymore, doesn’t care if she’s getting 
thick,’" Richardson’s aunt told Cosmopolitan. “I mean, the eating 
disorders were always horrible. So we were all like, ‘Oh, yay! She’s 
putting weight on.’” As Richardson’s 
relationship with her new boyfriend progressed, her mom, Kim, thought it
 might be time for Richardson to talk to a gynecologist about birth 
control, Cosmo reported. Richardson went to her
 first appointment with an OB/GYN on April 26, 2017, Kraft said. But the
 doctor told Richardson she couldn’t have birth control: She was already
 32 weeks pregnant. “Upon learning she was 
pregnant, Brooke burst into tears and told her doctor that she could not
 have this child and that she could not tell anyone about being 
pregnant,” Kraft said, according to Fox 19′s video footage of the trial. “And Brooke told no one. She did not tell her parents, her friends or the baby’s father. The
 doctor told her she could expect to give birth within 10 weeks, 
according to Rittgers. But the doctor was wrong about one thing, 
Rittgers said: As it turned out, Richardson was actually 37 to 39 weeks 
pregnant. The fetus was smaller than it should have been, he said. Instead of giving birth 10 weeks later, she gave birth within 11 days. The
 baby was a lifeless pale, Rittgers said. The umbilical cord was not 
attached to the placenta. The newborn wasn’t breathing, he said. Her 
mother, Kim, told the Cincinnati Enquirer that her daughter said she cradled the baby for hours, waiting for it to open its eyes or cry or move, but it never did. Finally,
 Kim said, Richardson grabbed a garden spade from the garage, and 
retreated to the far end of the family’s expansive backyard. She dug a 
hole between two pine trees. “It is so hard to believe that I had a grandchild that I never got to hold,” Kim told the Enquirer. The
 next time Richardson returned to the gynecologist for birth control 
later that summer, she told the doctor what happened — and before long, 
police had questions. At first, Rittgers said, 
police were not challenging Richardson’s explanation that the baby was 
stillborn. But then came a doctor hired by the prosecution. She examined
 the skeleton — and said the bones appeared “charred.” That’s when Fornshell revealed to a room of reporters in August 2017
 that authorities believed Richardson burned the baby. Asked for the 
motive, he pointed to the family’s alleged concern about appearances, 
which the family has adamantly denied. “She’s a
 cute recent high school graduate, she was a cheerleader, described as a
 ‘good girl’ by her attorney,” Fornshell said. “And I think that kind of
 perception is one that Skylar wanted to perpetuate and her mother 
wanted to perpetuate.” Fornshell said he couldn’t say how the baby was burned or how the baby was killed. Rittgers
 said Tuesday that’s because the baby wasn’t killed. What the 
prosecution didn’t disclose to jurors Tuesday, he said, was that the 
doctor who thought the remains were burned later recanted that testimony
 and said she made a mistake. (Fornshell has previously disputed Rittgers’s characterization of the experts’ opinions.) By
 then, Richardson was already indicted — based in part on the erroneous 
charred bones details, Rittgers said. Those details also led detectives 
to try wrangling a confession out of Richardson throughout hours of 
questioning. Holding her hands at the table in an interrogation room, 
“as if they were her friends,” Rittgers said, the police told her it 
would be better if she said she was trying to cremate the body. 
Eventually, Rittgers said, after denying she burned the baby 17 times, 
and after describing the baby being born dead 29 times, she seemed to 
relent, saying she did try to cremate her. Rittgers said they “broke her
 down.” “What
 happens when that doctor who made this horrible mistake changes her 
mind and tells everyone I was wrong, the bones weren’t burnt?” Rittgers 
said. “What happened? The police didn’t hit a reset button. The 
prosecutors didn’t hit a reset button. … They disregard all truth that 
does not fit into their story. And that’s why we’re here today.” Kraft
 conceded that the prosecution lacks “medical and scientific” evidence 
about the baby’s cause of death, but said prosecutors also collected a 
trove of electronic messages that investigators took from multiple 
devices in the home that will help prove the case. She said those 
details would come later. In addition to 
aggravated murder, Richardson is also charged with involuntary 
manslaughter, endangering a child, tampering with evidence and gross 
abuse of a corpse. The trial is expected to last two weeks. If convicted, Richardson could face life in prison."
The entire story can be read at: 
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
