PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "From the beginning, Richardson has insisted the baby was stillborn. But even as a coroner has been unable to determine a cause of death, prosecutors insist the cause was homicide, and that Richardson, now 20, buried the evidence so she could continue on with a picture-perfect teenage lifestyle. The case exploded, becoming a tabloid-fare narrative about an all-American cheerleader accused of secretly killing her own child because she and her family were “pretty obsessed” with external appearances, as Warren County Prosecutor David P. Fornshell said in 2017. He claimed Richardson burned the baby’s corpse too — sinister details that later turned out to be incorrect, Richardson’s attorney said, but that nevertheless only fueled nonstop coverage. Photographers camped outside the family’s home in small-town Carlisle, waiting to share the latest snippets of the family’s lives. Antiabortion activists picketed Richardson’s hearings, demanding justice for Baby Jane Doe. But Richardson didn’t kill the baby, her attorney, Charles M. Rittgers, insisted to prospective jurors Tuesday during jury selection. Instead, he said, “This case was about a massive rush to judgment.”
PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "What the prosecution didn’t disclose to jurors Tuesday, he (Defence Attorney Charles M. Rittgers) said, was that the doctor who thought the remains were burned later recanted that testimony and said she made a mistake. ((Prosecutor David. P.) Fornshell has previously disputed Rittgers’s characterization of the experts’ opinions.) By then, Richardson was already indicted — based in part on the erroneous charred bones details, Rittgers said. Those details also led detectives to try wrangling a confession out of Richardson throughout hours of questioning. Holding her hands at the table in an interrogation room, “as if they were her friends,” Rittgers said, the police told her it would be better if she said she was trying to cremate the body. Eventually, Rittgers said, after denying she burned the baby 17 times, and after describing the baby being born dead 29 times, she seemed to relent, saying she did try to cremate her. Rittgers said they “broke her down.” “What happens when that doctor who made this horrible mistake changes her mind and tells everyone I was wrong, the bones weren’t burnt?” Rittgers said. “What happened? The police didn’t hit a reset button. The prosecutors didn’t hit a reset button. … They disregard all truth that does not fit into their story. And that’s why we’re here today.”
STORY: "A teen said she buried her stillborn baby in the backyard after prom. Now she’s on trial for murder," by reporter Meagan Flynn, published by The Washington Post on September 4, 2019.
PHOTO CAPTION: "
GIST: "For
months, nobody knew 18-year-old Brooke Skylar Richardson was pregnant.
The bump barely showed when the college-bound high school senior wore a
cheerleading uniform on the sidelines, or a bikini on spring break, or
even when she wore a snug-fitting sparkly red gown to prom less than two
days before giving birth on May 7, 2017. Even then, no one but Richardson and her gynecologist knew, prosecutors said in court Tuesday in Warren County, Ohio. It
was the middle of the night when the baby came, prosecutors said.
Richardson’s parents were asleep downstairs; her brother was asleep
across the hall. The teenager went to the bathroom — and emerged with a
lifeless baby. Alone, she buried the infant in
the backyard and went back inside, still telling no one, prosecutors
said. She graduated high school a few weeks later, and spent the next
two months preparing for college at the University of Cincinnati. Then,
one afternoon in July 2017, the police called. Richardson’s gynecologist
had reported the baby’s death to the Warren County coroner, leaving the
cause of death blank. Now, police wanted to know: How did the infant die? That’s
the same question a jury will be left to decide as Richardson’s trial
on charges of aggravated murder in the death of her baby begins this
week. From the beginning, Richardson has insisted the baby was
stillborn. But even as a coroner has been unable to determine a cause of
death, prosecutors insist the cause was homicide, and that Richardson,
now 20, buried the evidence so she could continue on with a
picture-perfect teenage lifestyle. The case
exploded, becoming a tabloid-fare narrative about an all-American
cheerleader accused of secretly killing her own child because she and
her family were “pretty obsessed” with external appearances, as Warren
County Prosecutor David P. Fornshell said in 2017. He claimed Richardson
burned the baby’s corpse too — sinister details that later turned out
to be incorrect, Richardson’s attorney said, but that nevertheless only
fueled nonstop coverage. Photographers camped outside the family’s home
in small-town Carlisle, waiting to share the latest snippets of the
family’s lives. Antiabortion activists picketed Richardson’s hearings, demanding justice for Baby Jane Doe. But
Richardson didn’t kill the baby, her attorney, Charles M. Rittgers,
insisted to prospective jurors Tuesday during jury selection. Instead,
he said, “This case was about a massive rush to judgment.” Warren
County Assistant Prosecutor Julie Kraft said Tuesday that it all began
in August 2016, when Richardson broke off a relationship with a guy she
had been dating for about a month. She would
spend much of her senior year of high school pregnant, but it was hard
for friends and family to tell. For years, Richardson had suffered from
anorexia and bulimia, friends and family told Cosmopolitan last year.
They could tell in the spring of 2017 that she had put on weight — but
the last thing they wanted to do was ask her why. Richardson had a new
boyfriend she met at school. She was on the honor roll and had been
accepted to college. Maybe she was just feeling more comfortable in her
body, they thought. “I
was happy because I was like, ‘Oh, she’s met this nice boy. She doesn’t
care about how she looks anymore, doesn’t care if she’s getting
thick,’" Richardson’s aunt told Cosmopolitan. “I mean, the eating
disorders were always horrible. So we were all like, ‘Oh, yay! She’s
putting weight on.’” As Richardson’s
relationship with her new boyfriend progressed, her mom, Kim, thought it
might be time for Richardson to talk to a gynecologist about birth
control, Cosmo reported. Richardson went to her
first appointment with an OB/GYN on April 26, 2017, Kraft said. But the
doctor told Richardson she couldn’t have birth control: She was already
32 weeks pregnant. “Upon learning she was
pregnant, Brooke burst into tears and told her doctor that she could not
have this child and that she could not tell anyone about being
pregnant,” Kraft said, according to Fox 19′s video footage of the trial. “And Brooke told no one. She did not tell her parents, her friends or the baby’s father. The
doctor told her she could expect to give birth within 10 weeks,
according to Rittgers. But the doctor was wrong about one thing,
Rittgers said: As it turned out, Richardson was actually 37 to 39 weeks
pregnant. The fetus was smaller than it should have been, he said. Instead of giving birth 10 weeks later, she gave birth within 11 days. The
baby was a lifeless pale, Rittgers said. The umbilical cord was not
attached to the placenta. The newborn wasn’t breathing, he said. Her
mother, Kim, told the Cincinnati Enquirer that her daughter said she cradled the baby for hours, waiting for it to open its eyes or cry or move, but it never did. Finally,
Kim said, Richardson grabbed a garden spade from the garage, and
retreated to the far end of the family’s expansive backyard. She dug a
hole between two pine trees. “It is so hard to believe that I had a grandchild that I never got to hold,” Kim told the Enquirer. The
next time Richardson returned to the gynecologist for birth control
later that summer, she told the doctor what happened — and before long,
police had questions. At first, Rittgers said,
police were not challenging Richardson’s explanation that the baby was
stillborn. But then came a doctor hired by the prosecution. She examined
the skeleton — and said the bones appeared “charred.” That’s when Fornshell revealed to a room of reporters in August 2017
that authorities believed Richardson burned the baby. Asked for the
motive, he pointed to the family’s alleged concern about appearances,
which the family has adamantly denied. “She’s a
cute recent high school graduate, she was a cheerleader, described as a
‘good girl’ by her attorney,” Fornshell said. “And I think that kind of
perception is one that Skylar wanted to perpetuate and her mother
wanted to perpetuate.” Fornshell said he couldn’t say how the baby was burned or how the baby was killed. Rittgers
said Tuesday that’s because the baby wasn’t killed. What the
prosecution didn’t disclose to jurors Tuesday, he said, was that the
doctor who thought the remains were burned later recanted that testimony
and said she made a mistake. (Fornshell has previously disputed Rittgers’s characterization of the experts’ opinions.) By
then, Richardson was already indicted — based in part on the erroneous
charred bones details, Rittgers said. Those details also led detectives
to try wrangling a confession out of Richardson throughout hours of
questioning. Holding her hands at the table in an interrogation room,
“as if they were her friends,” Rittgers said, the police told her it
would be better if she said she was trying to cremate the body.
Eventually, Rittgers said, after denying she burned the baby 17 times,
and after describing the baby being born dead 29 times, she seemed to
relent, saying she did try to cremate her. Rittgers said they “broke her
down.” “What
happens when that doctor who made this horrible mistake changes her
mind and tells everyone I was wrong, the bones weren’t burnt?” Rittgers
said. “What happened? The police didn’t hit a reset button. The
prosecutors didn’t hit a reset button. … They disregard all truth that
does not fit into their story. And that’s why we’re here today.” Kraft
conceded that the prosecution lacks “medical and scientific” evidence
about the baby’s cause of death, but said prosecutors also collected a
trove of electronic messages that investigators took from multiple
devices in the home that will help prove the case. She said those
details would come later. In addition to
aggravated murder, Richardson is also charged with involuntary
manslaughter, endangering a child, tampering with evidence and gross
abuse of a corpse. The trial is expected to last two weeks. If convicted, Richardson could face life in prison."
The entire story can be read at:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;