STORY: "Forensic scientist deflects blame over David Eastman evidence," by reporter Christopher Knaus, published by the Canberra Times on March 25, 2014.
GIST: "A forensic scientist has deflected blame over failures to
keep track of crucial gunshot residue used to link David Eastman to the
scene of the ACT police chief's 1989 murder. The questioning of Victorian-based expert Robert Barnes, who
worked on the case from the night Assistant Federal Police Commissioner
Colin Winchester was shot dead, continued in the Eastman inquiry on
Tuesday. The inquiry has already heard evidence critical of Mr Barnes'
work, and questions were aired about his independence following his
assurances to a senior Operation Peat detective that he was a "police
witness". Counsel assisting the inquiry Liesl Chapman, SC, asked Mr
Barnes about his handling of green gunshot residue particles found in
Eastman's boot and at the scene. Mr Barnes gave evidence about the particles, which would prove significant to the case, during Eastman's 1995 trial. But some of the records tracking the handling and movements of the evidence are missing. Some of the particles were never recorded as being logged
with the Victorian State Forensic Science Laboratory, where Mr Barnes
worked, after the expert took them from the Australian Federal Police in
Canberra. Other particles are recorded as having come to the Victorian lab, but as never having been taken out by Mr Barnes for testing. The expert was questioned about what he had done with those particles. He responded by saying others at the laboratory must have made a mistake and not recorded their movements properly. Earlier on Tuesday, Mr Barnes said he believed that he was
not subject to policies that forensic work should be peer-reviewed by
other scientists. He said he was too senior for peer-review to apply to his work. "Simply because it was not possible, as I said your honour, to find people at that level," Mr Barnes said.".........His evidence continues on Tuesday afternoon."
The entire story can be found at:
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/forensic-scientist-deflects-blame-over-david-eastman-evidence-20140325-35fm0.html
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
I
have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses
several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of
the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this
powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and
myself get more out of the site.
The
Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible
years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr.
Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of
Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"
section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It
can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com.
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;