"Why were fresh inquests ordered? Twenty years after the Hillsborough disaster, following repeated attempts to
force a re-examination of what went wrong and whether the truth had been
covered up, the Government finally instituted the Hillsborough Independent
Panel. Its report, published in September 2012, absolved Liverpool
fans of any responsibility, found the police were mainly to blame and
demonstrated that witness statements had been deliberately altered. It also
determined up to 41 of those who died may have been saved had the emergency
services response been improved. None of this had emerged during the
original inquests, which controversially returned verdicts of accidental
death."
The remaining questions and answers can be found at:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/10733827/Hillsborough-inquest-Questions-and-answers.html
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.
The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com.
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;
