STORY: "No misconduct charges for 'aggressive and abusive' Peel police interview tactics," by reporter Wendy Gillis, published by the Toronto Star on October 28, 2015.
SUB-HEADING: "OIPRD found insufficient evidence to charge officers following a complaint by Eric Morgan, who spent three years in jail awaiting a murder trial."
PHOTO CAPTION; "Eric Morgan filed a complaint to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director after spending three years behind bars in a case that was ultimately thrown out."
GIST: The province’s police watchdog has found insufficient evidence of misconduct by the Peel Regional Police detectives who employed what an Ontario Superior court judge called “aggressive and abusive” tactics and “leading” questioning to obtain evidence in a murder case. The Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) will not charge any of the Peel detectives involved in the case of Eric Morgan, the Brampton man acquitted of second-degree murder in the death of Mervyn Spence after two murder trials and more than three years in jail while his case was before the court. Superior Court Justice Fletcher Dawson, who presided over Morgan’s retrial in November 2013, highlighted what he viewed as problematic police actions used during interviews with key witnesses, including “improper threats and overly aggressive and abusive tactics.” In one case, Dawson said one witness was “psychologically broken down” after an eight-hour “relentless onslaught” by Peel police. Under repeated threat of being charged with crime if he did not change his account, the witness recanted testimony that supported Morgan’s innocence, a story change Dawson called “the direct result of threatening and oppressive police conduct.” In another interview, a detective used “leading and suggestive” tactics that demonstrated he “had an agenda,” Dawson said. But an investigation by the OIPRD — which included interviews with the officers, their superiors and some witnesses, as well as reviews of videos depicting the witness interviews in question — found the “tactics used to pressure the various witnesses were consistent with their training,” according to the investigative report. “Each (officer) had extensive training and experience in interviewing,” reads the report. The OIPRD report emphasizes the challenges Peel police faced while they investigated Spence’s shooting death, including a total lack of forensic evidence and difficulties convincing witnesses to talk.........The forceful questioning employed by Peel officers is sometimes referred to as the Reid technique of police interrogation, a controversial interview tactic typically used on suspects to assess guilt or produce confessions, not on witnesses providing information. The OIPRD investigation found only one of the officers connected to the case had any training in the Reid technique, and that officer’s involvement was limited to one interview that Dawson said was conducted in a fair manner. Morgan filed a $25-million lawsuit against the Peel Police Services Board, the former police chief and five police officers, including Peel Det. Thomas Doherty, who led the investigation. No statement of defence in the case has yet been filed, according to Morgan’s lawyers. Spence was gunned down on Nov. 4, 2006, outside Malibu Marie’s nightclub in Brampton, after attending a party thrown by Morgan to celebrate his own 39th birthday. More than three years later, Morgan was arrested and charged with the second-degree murder of Spence, who was a casual acquaintance. The charge was based on two witness interviews; no physical evidence linked him to the crime and no motive was ever provided by the Crown. Morgan’s first trial, before Justice Nancy Mossip, resulted in a hung jury after one of the witnesses recanted her identification of Morgan as the murderer. That witness had named Morgan as the shooter during one of the interviews Dawson later found to be problematic. But the OIPRD investigators gave significant weight to the fact that Mossip didn’t raise any concerns about the police tactics in the case. “One judge ruled that the methods were proper and a second judge disagreed,” the OIPRD report states. The officers said they were employing the Reid technique during the interviews......... Morgan filed a $25-million lawsuit against the Peel Police Services Board, the former police chief and five police officers, including Peel Det. Thomas Doherty, who led the investigation. No statement of defence in the case has yet been filed, according to Morgan’s lawyers. Spence was gunned down on Nov. 4, 2006, outside Malibu Marie’s nightclub in Brampton, after attending a party thrown by Morgan to celebrate his own 39th birthday. More than three years later, Morgan was arrested and charged with the second-degree murder of Spence, who was a casual acquaintance. The charge was based on two witness interviews; no physical evidence linked him to the crime and no motive was ever provided by the Crown. Morgan’s first trial, before Justice Nancy Mossip, resulted in a hung jury after one of the witnesses recanted her identification of Morgan as the murderer. That witness had named Morgan as the shooter during one of the interviews Dawson later found to be problematic. But the OIPRD investigators gave significant weight to the fact that Mossip didn’t raise any concerns about the police tactics in the case. “One judge ruled that the methods were proper and a second judge disagreed,” the OIPRD report states. David Shulman, one of Morgan’s lawyers, said the two differing views do not cancel each other out, because Mossip did not view all of the video of Peel’s interviews. Dawson, the second judge, did view the videos of Peel’s witness interviews in question, and twice noted that the interviews needed to be watched to fully appreciate the police tactics used and the pressure witnesses were under. “The transcript alone is inadequate,” Dawson said. Morgan, now living in Brampton, is deeply disappointed by the OIPRD decision. “I don’t know what other evidence they needed. It’s so clear,” he said."......... “I fought for my freedom, and after I got out I wanted to keep fighting. So regardless of the (OIPRD) director’s decision, I am continuing with my civil suit,” Morgan said. “I’m not going to let this tear me apart.”
The entire story can be found at:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.
The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com; Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;
