Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Julie Baumer: Michigan; (Wrongful shaken baby syndrome conviction); David Gavitt; Michigan (Wrongful false arson science): Two things they both have in common; They were both convicted by misguided 'science' - and they were both wrongfully charged, tried, convicted and imprisoned in a state which does not pay a cent to the wrongly convicted victims of its criminal justice system: Michigan Radio's political analyst sheds light on this injustice - and state senator Steve Bieda who wants to do something about it..."Yesterday, Bieda told me “when a wrongfully convicted person gets released from prison, it is a major news event.” But after that, when the cameras fade and they are used to being home, they are forced to face the world penniless, their skills out of date, and they not even eligible for the sort of re-entry programs we offer convicted felons. Thirty-one states and the federal government offer the wrongly imprisoned at least some compensation, but Michigan doesn’t."...Jack Lessenberry; Michigan Radio; Political analyst;


STORY: Michigan should join states that compensate wrongly convicted," by Jack Lessenberry, published by Michigan radio on September 27, 2016. (Jack Lessenberry is Michigan Radio's political analyst);

GIST: "Macomb County resident Julie Baumer volunteered to care for her sister’s unwanted baby thirteen years ago. She was a 27-year-old mortgage broker who was engaged to be married and had a full life, but she didn’t want the little boy to be put up for adoption. But a few weeks later, she took the baby to the hospital, where doctors discovered a lot of blood on his brain. She was suspected of violently shaking the baby. She was convicted of first degree child abuse. She lost her job, her freedom, her fiancé and her life. Four years later, a new investigation revealed Baumer was totally innocent. The baby had suffered a rare stroke. Her conviction was overturned, and she was released from prison six years ago. But her life had been destroyed, and she received exactly nothing in compensation from the state  These days, she cleans office buildings at night. David Gavitt, however, had it even worse. His wife and two young children died in a house fire in 1985. He had no criminal history but prosecutors convicted him of burning the house down. Gavitt rotted in prison for 27 years until investigators for the Michigan Innocence Clinic took up the case and showed Ionia County prosecutors that the evidence had been misread. Four years ago, his conviction was overturned, and he was released. He lost a huge part of his life thanks to errors made by the state, and his compensation was also zero. For years, State Senator Steve Bieda has sought to correct this injustice, and he finally may be close to success. A Democrat from Warren, Bieda has had rare success building bi-partisan coalitions in Lansing. Three months ago, the state senate passed his wrongful conviction compensation bill unanimously. The bill had been weakened a bit, but those totally exonerated would still get $50,000 a year for every year they were wrongly imprisoned. This would be limited to victims who could prove they were totally innocent, not just guilty of a lesser crime. Yesterday, Bieda told me “when a wrongfully convicted person gets released from prison, it is a major news event.” But after that, when the cameras fade and they are used to being home, they are forced to face the world penniless, their skills out of date, and they not even eligible for the sort of re-entry programs we offer convicted felons. Thirty-one states and the federal government offer the wrongly imprisoned at least some compensation, but Michigan doesn’t."

The entire story can be  found at

http://michiganradio.org/post/michigan-should-join-states-compensate-wrongfully-convicted#stream/0

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:  http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  
Harold Levy. Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.