POST: "Eastman witnesses asked to "please explain," by Courts Reporter Michael Inman, published by the Canberra Times on May 6, 2014.
GIST: "It is understood Victorian forensic scientist Robert Barnes, whose work helped convict Eastman at trial, and the Australian Federal Police were among those to receive a notice. Mr Barnes is thought to have run out of funds for his legal team and it is unclear how he will respond. His analysis of gunshot residue provided a critical link between Eastman and the murder scene, and helped eventually secure the conviction. Mr Barnes’ work on the case was put under the microscope during the recent public hearings, leading to allegations he overstated the strength of the evidence and allowed "unacceptable confusion" in the labelling of exhibits."
GIST: "It is understood Victorian forensic scientist Robert Barnes, whose work helped convict Eastman at trial, and the Australian Federal Police were among those to receive a notice. Mr Barnes is thought to have run out of funds for his legal team and it is unclear how he will respond. His analysis of gunshot residue provided a critical link between Eastman and the murder scene, and helped eventually secure the conviction. Mr Barnes’ work on the case was put under the microscope during the recent public hearings, leading to allegations he overstated the strength of the evidence and allowed "unacceptable confusion" in the labelling of exhibits."
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/eastman-witnesses-asked-to-please-explain-20140506-zr5mk.html
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.
The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com.
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;